Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting

2023-05-27 Thread tschaefer
Am 27.05.2023 12:28 schrieb Marco Davids via ipv6-wg :Op 27-05-23 om 10:45 schreef Thomas Schäfer: > Someone made the proposal to provide a real "ipv6 only"  > Let's try it! A lot will break for sure. It's not just websites. The DNS may break as well. It won't. I expect the resolver is still

Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting

2023-05-27 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 12:28:24PM +0200, Marco Davids via ipv6-wg wrote: > > - VPN, own organisation/company > > At our company we spent quite some effort is getting this right. And it > is fun to open the VPN on an IPv6-only network and still get IPv4-access > via the VPN. I guess what

Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting

2023-05-27 Thread Marco Davids via ipv6-wg
Op 27-05-23 om 10:45 schreef Thomas Schäfer: during the closing plenary were considerations to remove the IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) network/ssid the next time. I would vote for that. IPv6-mostly covers the traditional IPv6-only. Yes, I agree. Someone made the proposal to provide a real

[ipv6-wg] IPv6-mostly IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) dual stack at RIPE-meeting

2023-05-27 Thread Thomas Schäfer
Hi, during the closing plenary were considerations to remove the IPv6-only(with dns64/nat64) network/ssid the next time. I would vote for that. IPv6-mostly covers the traditional IPv6-only. Someone made the proposal to provide a real "ipv6 only" net/ssid instead (without nat64) My first