Re: [ipv6-wg] [official] What Shall This WG Do

On 10/8/19 12:20 PM, Wolfgang Zenker wrote: Hi Jen and group, * Jen Linkova [191005 04:20]: to hurt. The working group should provide group b) with guidance how to make at least their outward facing services available on dual stack. I've started a Google sheet with links to hosting provider

Re: [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

On 10/5/19 12:06 PM, Dave Taht wrote: Lee Howard writes: IPv6 deployment in your network means cutting your NAT expense in half. More, as more sites deploy. There's no fungable or measureable "NAT expense". NAT generally saves money. Look at the container market for one

Re: [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

On 10/5/19 11:53 AM, Dave Taht wrote: Lee Howard writes: On 10/4/19 4:55 PM, Dave Taht wrote: not being able to get a static IPv6 address out of comcast, my hurricane tunnel getting blocked by netflix, the still-huge prefix sub-distribution problem. The idea of dynamic 2 week prefixes in

Re: [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Replying to the Subject question. . . The WG has done good work. RIPE-554 in particular I think is good work. This WG isn't a marketing organization. That's appropriate. One way to look at the problem is that IPv4 exhaustion is a problem of externalities: my network is growing, and it costs me

Re: [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

On 10/4/19 4:55 PM, Dave Taht wrote: not being able to get a static IPv6 address out of comcast, my hurricane tunnel getting blocked by netflix, the still-huge prefix sub-distribution problem. The idea of dynamic 2 week prefixes in part of the world prone to earthquakes doesn't work for me...

Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 Implementation for an ISP

If you have enough IPv4 address space, the easiest way to do IPv6 is to go dual-stack (both IPv4 and IPv6 to every customer), and then work on the transition technologies. Here's my "Learn IPv6 before lunch" reading list: https://www.retevia.net/recommended-reading-on-ipv6/ Here's a high-lev

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 operations discussions

The IETF v6ops working group is chartered to improve the operation of IPv6. We have several active documents right now that would benefit from broader operator feedback. For instance, there is current active discussion on: Requirements for IPv6 Routers