Re: [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

2019-10-05 Thread Roger Jørgensen
... I guess this "war" is why some people want to make ipv6 as much like ipv4 as possible? Only . vs : and hex vs pure number as the only difference? ------- Roger Jørgensen rog...@gmail.com On Sat, Oct 5, 2019, 21:44 Michel Py wrote: > Hi Job, > > > Job Snijders wrot

Re: [ipv6-wg] Chair selection: call for candidates

2016-10-19 Thread Roger Jørgensen
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Jetten Raymond wrote: > Hi all, > > Since there is not too much of a queue, i would like to announce that I am > available as a candidate. supported -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rog...@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.n

Re: [ipv6-wg] RIPE Policy vs IETF RFC

2016-06-13 Thread Roger Jørgensen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Nathalie Trenaman wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > As you might know, the current IPv6 policy states very clear that assignments > to customers must be a minimum of a /64. > > 5.4.1. Assignment address space size > > End Users are assigned an End Site assignment fro

Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6-only network during RIPE 71

2015-11-03 Thread Roger Jørgensen
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:21:42AM +0900, Shane Kerr wrote: >> tl;dr Don't so cautious. Removing the "experimental" tag from IPv6 won't >> ruin the RIPE meeting. > > What Shane said. Short and long form :-) Just a +1 to what Sh