] Version 6 of IPv6 prefix delegations BCOP is out
On 13/08/2017 17:50, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> two last-minute comments from me...
Hey,
Thnx for your comments!
>
> I seem to have a problem understanding the following paragraph:
>
>> Non-persistent prefix
Hi Jan,
two last-minute comments from me...
I seem to have a problem understanding the following paragraph:
> Non-persistent prefix assignment also appears initially easier as it
> facilitates aggregation of
> internal routing tables according to end customer connection termination
> points.
Hey,
On 09/08/2017 16:28, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote:
> Hello again and thank you for the effort,
No problem...
I addressed some of your comments and here is the version 7 f the draft:
https://www.sinog.si/docs/draft-IPv6pd-BCOP-v7.pdf
I hope that now everyone is happy with the text and we can
On 09/08/2017 16:28, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote:
> Hello again and thank you for the effort,
>
> just a few more comments
Hi,
Does that bring us to v.7 of the draft and another cycle? If so, let's
do it ;)
>
>
> Executive Summary, b2: The benefit is not clear. "Differentiate..., even
> if it
Hello again and thank you for the effort,
just a few more comments
Executive Summary, b2: The benefit is not clear. "Differentiate..., even
if it increases complexity". I would expect something along the lines
of: "Differentiate..., even if it increases complexity, because of this
and that
