Walt,
Just curious: If KRKO's IBOC hash trashes 1395, why doesn't it affect the same
level TP on 1386?
Pete Taylor
Tacoma, WA
12225w 4719n
HQ180 ICF2010
Kiwa aircore Palomar loops
DX398, SRF-59 M37V
Eton E100 + Tecsun PL-300
WALTER SALMANIW wrote:
1386: 7
And if it is KRKO IBOC, 1395 should be clear by using USB since IBOC uses 15
kHz.
Chuck
From: p...@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 09:49:31 -0700
To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP loggings from Masset for 10 July, 2010: DU all the way!
Walt,
Just curious: If
I've found that the primary IBOC sideband is worst at about +/- 14 Khz.
ie..KMOX 1120 IBOC ruins Croatia 1134 here in IL unless I phase it down.
Similarily, WSCR 670 means that I can forget about Spain 684. As for 15 Khz
away, there's still plenty of IBOC, but not as bad and often USB or PBT
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2010 Jul 11 1806 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
# Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 10 July follow.
Solar flux 80 and mid-latitude A-index 2.
The mid-latitude
!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:;
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:Times New Roman;
mso-fareast-font-family:Times New
Unlike Neil, I use the side bands to get away from the IBOC hash. It's very
easy to spot on the Perseus waterfall screen as 2 wide bands on each side of
the carrier. One usually can eliminate or reduce greatly the hash by tuning
either USB or LSB depending on which side it's on, but I agree,
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2010 Jul 12 0006 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
# Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 11 July follow.
Solar flux 83 and mid-latitude A-index 4.
The mid-latitude
