With the Kenwood TS-930 and 80M inverted-L the signal was anywhere between S0
and S3. With the Icom R-75 and Ratzlaff active whip, there was still QSB, but
the signal was always audible and peaking at S5. Wow, dramatic jump at 0602
just as I'm typing typing this. Kick in the supercharger? Goo
Nick,
At 0616 it is coming in very nicely. Some fades, but pretty stable off
SW EWE. A bit better than the NW/NE EWE. The SW EWE in longer though.
Patrick
Patrick Martin
KGED QSL Manager
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kot
Nick,
Coming in quite well here.
73,
Patrick
Patrick Martin
KGED QSL Manager
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the origin
I'm on 1998.5 right now (CW mode) What I hear too far down in the mud sounds
like RTTY. Can't discern anything yet...73 Mike Sanburn KG6LJU
> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:49:58 +
> To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> From: n...@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] 160m beacon
&g
...@ieee.org
> Subject: [IRCA] 160m beacon
>
>
>
> I will run the 160 meter amateur radio beacon this evening, 21 October our
> time (22 Oct UTC). I plan two segments, one starting before and running past
> local sunset from 0105UT to 0135UT, and one from 0550 to 0615UT.
&g
At 05:09 10/22/2009, you wrote:
.
>At 01:13 you were 56 db weaker than the CFAX carrier here. Frequency drifted
>upwards about 100 Hz over a 15 minute period.
I'm surprised the difference is so small Brian(hi) CFAX does have a
pretty nice antenna array and radial field I understand, so p
Walter Salmaniw wrote:
At 11:06 AM 10/21/2009, you wrote:
I will run the 160 meter amateur radio beacon this evening, 21 October our time
(22 Oct UTC). I plan two segments, one starting before and running past local
sunset from 0105UT to 0135UT, and one from 0550 to 0615UT.
This will be o
Hi Nick,
I monitored 1998.5 for your first period of transmission and didn't notice
ANY trace of your beacon on Perseus until very late, at about 0135. Then I
heard the CW signal, and the blip from the carrier began to appear on the
display. The signal was really threshold, though.
I was using th
I'm listening on 1998.5 right now, but darn, it's 0243 UTC. 'Guess that I'm
between shifts, hi. Mike Sanburn KG6LJU
> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:08:09 -0700
> To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
> From: salma...@shaw.ca
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] 160m beacon
>
At 01:35 10/22/2009, you wrote:
>No joy in Troy Michigan (hey, it was worth a try!) although I didn't get to
>try until 0134 UTC.
>
>Hopefully next time. Thanks anyway.
>
>73 de Joe, KJ8O
>
Thanks Joeleave a recorder running for the 0550UT test maybe?
Nick
*
Ni
Nick,
I just got home a bit ago, but I will try after 0550 again. Thanks. 40
watts should make it. After all I do have a 5 watt pirate on 1630 from
Vancouver from 25 years ago, plus a couple 10 watt TIS stations from
Bellingham on 1610.
73,
Patrick
Patrick Martin
KGED QSL Manager
At 01:24 10/22/2009, you wrote:
>Hi Nick,
>Your beacon is doing well here tonight. With conditions as they are it
> should get much further I would imagine.
>
got a report off list from Arkansas, but no luck getting into Ontario or Norway
per the mwdx list.
Thanks for checking gentlemen.
09 14:06:52 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [IRCA] 160m beacon
I will run the 160 meter amateur radio beacon this evening, 21 October our time
(22 Oct UTC). I plan two segments, one starting before and running past local
sunset from 0105UT to 0135UT, and one from 0550 to 0615UT.
This will be on 1998.
Finally got 100% copy on several ID's at 0130 UTC. Not consistent however. S2.
Bob Coomler W7SWL
Cloverdale, CA
--- On Wed, 10/21/09, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
> From: Nick Hall-Patch
> Subject: [IRCA] 160m beacon
> To: "mailing list for the International Radio Club of
Hi Nick,
Your beacon is doing well here tonight. With conditions as they
are it should get much further I would imagine.
73,
Nigel
Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
At 01:08 10/22/2009, you wrote:
Loud and clear starting at 01:07, Nick. And yes, it's VVV de VE7DXR (why I'm not an amateur, I
weak on the fairly high (160') dipole but S7 on the very newly completed 4
square (4 x 132' radiators plus 60 1/4 wave radials under each) aimed in
your direction.
73 Don
VE6JY
Lamont Alberta
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
> At 01:08 10/22/2009, you wrote:
>
> >Loud and
At 01:08 10/22/2009, you wrote:
>Loud and clear starting at 01:07, Nick. And yes, it's VVV de VE7DXR (why I'm
>not an amateur, I guess). Excellent reception, although the first few seconds
>were a bit wobbly on the frequencyWalt
Thanks Walt. This will shut down my listening for the next
At 01:08 10/22/2009, you wrote:
>Loud and clear starting at 01:07, Nick. And yes, it's VVV de VE7DXR (why I'm
>not an amateur, I guess). Excellent reception, although the first few seconds
>were a bit wobbly on the frequencyWalt
Thanks for checking Waltnow to see if it's getting any
At 11:06 AM 10/21/2009, you wrote:
>I will run the 160 meter amateur radio beacon this evening, 21 October our
>time (22 Oct UTC). I plan two segments, one starting before and running past
>local sunset from 0105UT to 0135UT, and one from 0550 to 0615UT.
>This will be on 1998.5 kHz and comprise
At 18:46 10/21/2009, you wrote:
>Nick,
>
>What is the power?
>
Although it's a 100 watt transceiver, the antenna is not optimum (a 14m
inductively loaded sloper), so I believe I'm getting about 40 watts out to it.
Nick
*
Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada
_
Nick,
What is the power?
Patrick Martin
KGED QSL Manager
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
contributors and d
I will run the 160 meter amateur radio beacon this evening, 21 October our time
(22 Oct UTC). I plan two segments, one starting before and running past local
sunset from 0105UT to 0135UT, and one from 0550 to 0615UT.
This will be on 1998.5 kHz and comprise a repeated CW identifier of my amateur
22 matches
Mail list logo
