Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Slide
FYI, this is an example of what my tool does for the issues from CodePlex https://github.com/slide/ip-test2/issues I haven't implemented the vote or date filtering yet, and this is not all of the issues from CodePlex, just some of them. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Slide wrote: > I think

Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Slide wrote: > This is in the post 2.7.5 timeframe, correct? We don't want to do this > before that is released? > Yeah. Plus hopefully a bunch of them will get fixed and then it's not a concern. :) - Jeff > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jeff Hardy wro

Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Keith Rome
IMO it is fine to lose them. I think codeplex automatically notifies you if an issue you opened has been closed (even if it is years later), so perhaps just going through and closing all of the < 2 vote or old issues with a notice that says "open a new issue on github if this is still relevant"

Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Slide
This is in the post 2.7.5 timeframe, correct? We don't want to do this before that is released? On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Slide wrote: > >> I could write a tool to do that too...screen scraping is actually kind of >> fun. >> > > I wou

Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Slide wrote: > I could write a tool to do that too...screen scraping is actually kind of > fun. > I would say you're a sick, twisted individual, but I get unreasonable joy out of forcing cmd.exe and MSBuild to do what I want, so I'll remain silent. :) > My init

Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Slide
I could write a tool to do that too...screen scraping is actually kind of fun. My initial plan was just to implement vote and date filters in my current tool that ports issues over, but closing things is fine with me too. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Keith Rome wrote: > IMO it is fine to

Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Slide wrote: > I think if you do > 1 vote, you'll miss a lot of issues that are valid, but > it would provide for a cleaner slate to begin with on GitHub. There are a > LOT of issues on CodePlex that are leftover from the MS days (internal bug > tracker migration)

Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Slide
I think if you do > 1 vote, you'll miss a lot of issues that are valid, but it would provide for a cleaner slate to begin with on GitHub. There are a LOT of issues on CodePlex that are leftover from the MS days (internal bug tracker migration) that would be really nice to get rid of since we don't

Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Slide wrote: >> Either way, the primary issue list will move to GitHub. The question is >> how: >> >> 1) Clean issue list in GH, abandon all CodePlex issues >> 2) Copy all open issues from CP >> 3) Copy all open issues from past 12 months >> 4) Copy all open issues

Re: [Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Slide
> > Either way, the primary issue list will move to GitHub. The question is > how: > > 1) Clean issue list in GH, abandon all CodePlex issues > 2) Copy all open issues from CP > 3) Copy all open issues from past 12 months > 4) Copy all open issues with > 1 votes > > Do you mean issues OPENED within

[Ironpython-users] CodePlex Issues (Was: IronPython 3 Update)

2014-03-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Pawel Jasinski wrote: > Hi, > > sometimes ago there was a plan to migrate from codeplex to github > issue tracking. > Since we are talking about a workflow, would it make sense to do migration > now? Not *right now*, but after 2.7.5 is out, just to cut down on th

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython 3 Update

2014-03-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Vernon D. Cole wrote: > Thank you, Jeff!! > > This is wonderful! I have already cloned the new repo on my Windows > development machine (such as it is, and old Windows 7 laptop) and will put > it on my Ubuntu development machine (the one I work on daily) in a few

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython 3 Update

2014-03-21 Thread Pawel Jasinski
Hi, sometimes ago there was a plan to migrate from codeplex to github issue tracking. Since we are talking about a workflow, would it make sense to do migration now? --pawel ___ Ironpython-users mailing list Ironpython-users@python.org https://mail.pyth

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython 3 Update

2014-03-21 Thread Vernon D. Cole
Thank you, Jeff!! This is wonderful! I have already cloned the new repo on my Windows development machine (such as it is, and old Windows 7 laptop) and will put it on my Ubuntu development machine (the one I work on daily) in a few minutes. Two questions remain that were not answered in the Read

[Ironpython-users] IronPython, Daily Digest 3/20/2014

2014-03-21 Thread CodePlex
Hi ironpython, Here's your Daily Digest of new issues for project "IronPython". In today's digest:ISSUES 1. [New issue] PEP 397 -- Python launcher for Windows -- ISSUES 1. [New issue] PEP 397 -- Python launcher for Windows http://ironpython.codeplex