[Ironpython-users] New Mailing List is now available

2011-06-16 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, After the downtime yesterday, the new mailing list is now available. It appears that everyone has received unsubscribe notices; these were sent in error. Everyone who was subscribed to the old list should be subscribed to the new list. The page for the new list is http://mail.python.org/ma

Re: [Ironpython-users] New Mailing List is now available

2011-06-16 Thread Slide
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > After the downtime yesterday, the new mailing list is now available. > It appears that everyone has received unsubscribe notices; these were > sent in error. Everyone who was subscribed to the old list should be > subscribed to the ne

[Ironpython-users] (Resend after group email address changed): Way to extend IronPython to application specific request without changing its source code?

2011-06-16 Thread zxpatric
Hi, I am looking to extend IronPython in the way that a script like following can run: Class1 c1 = Class1() print c1.Property with Class1 defined in .NET module: public class Class1 { private int a; public int A { get { return a;} set { a=value;} } }; Property is not

[Ironpython-users] IronPython wiki

2011-06-16 Thread Brian Wilson
Do you think there is enough interest to unlock the member feature on the IronPython.info wiki, or should I just talk here? BTW I've dealt with wiki spam by putting Captcha and ConfirmEdit on my wiki and it seems to work. -- Brian Wilson Corvallis Oregon _

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython wiki

2011-06-16 Thread Jimmy Schementi
On Jun 16, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Brian Wilson wrote: > Do you think there is enough interest to unlock the member feature on > the IronPython.info wiki, or should I just talk here? > > BTW I've dealt with wiki spam by putting Captcha and ConfirmEdit on my > wiki and it seems to work. http://ironpyth

Re: [Ironpython-users] (Resend after group email address changed): Way to extend IronPython to application specific request without changing its source code?

2011-06-16 Thread Dino Viehland
You can implement IDynamicMetaObjectProvider on the object, then implement a DynamicMetaObject which overrides GetMember and handles when "Property" is accessed. You'll need to produce an AST which represents how to access the member. A simple way to do this would be if you had a "static bool

[Ironpython-users] IronPython 2.7.1 Beta coming this weekend

2011-06-16 Thread Jeff Hardy
I'm planning to release a Beta of IronPython 2.7.1 for this weekend (June 18-19). I haven't decided on a timeline for the final release, but expect it to be about 3 weeks later. Bug fixes will still be accepted after the beta is released, but the sooner, the better. The main reason for this releas

Re: [Ironpython-users] (Resend after group email address changed): Way to extend IronPython to application specific request without changing its source code?

2011-06-16 Thread Kevin Hazzard, C# MVP
Inheriting from DynamicObject is the way to go for 90% of applications. I implement most of my dynamic types that way, as Dino suggested. If you already have a base class though, implementing IDynamicMetaObjectProvider isn't all that difficult. But you should have good working knowledge of Expressi

Re: [Ironpython-users] [IronPython] Visual studio 2010

2011-06-16 Thread Jimmy Schementi
Finally, when it comes to CI, is there a recognised way of runningIron Python modules from an MSBuild script?Paul,I have a VS2010 plugin that lets you run IronPython tests in MSTest; I'll put it on GitHub shortly.Excellent, thank you! I'll look forward to the link.OK, I put the tool on GitHub: http

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython 2.7.1 Beta coming this weekend

2011-06-16 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Jeff, Von: Jeff Hardy > > I'm planning to release a Beta of IronPython 2.7.1 for this weekend (June > 18-19). I haven't decided on a timeline for the final release, but expect > it to be about 3 weeks later. Bug fixes will still be accepted after the > beta is released, but the sooner, the be