Hi, Jeff,
> Von: Jeff Hardy [mailto:jdha...@gmail.com]
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Markus Schaber software.com> wrote:
> > We're using IronPython as a hosted script engine in our application.
>
> > Now, we want to restrict the assemblies a user can reference from its
> > python script,
>
Hi, Keith,
Von: Keith Rome [mailto:r...@wintellect.com]
> Take a look at the PlatformAdaptationLayer class. You can create your own and
> plug it in to the runtime. This might provide the hooks you are looking for.
> In particular, you should be able to override the LoadAssembly() and
> LoadAs
Hi ironpython,
Here's your Daily Digest of new issues for project "IronPython".
In today's digest:ISSUES
1. [New comment] bool value conversion malfunctions with Iron python libraries
--
ISSUES
1. [New comment] bool value conversion malfunctions wit
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Hi, Keith,
>
> Von: Keith Rome [mailto:r...@wintellect.com]
>> Take a look at the PlatformAdaptationLayer class. You can create your own
>> and plug it in to the runtime. This might provide the hooks you are looking
>> for.
>
>> In partic
Hi,
Is it possible to hire some of the IronPython Core developers for bugfixes, or
is there commercial support available?
Especially http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/31764 is a major issue for
some of our users, they fight with Out of Memory exceptions during automated
test runs which f
This doesn't directly address your question, but as I recall,
DefineDynamicAssembly is only used under very particular circumstances. It
can be avoided most of the time in non-debug usage of IronPython. The only
way to release some of the memory usage forced by DefineDynamicAssembly is
to tear down
Hi, Curt,
Thank you for your answer. Maybe it is possible to utlilise the Collectible
Assemblies introduced with .NET 4.0
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd554932%28v=vs.100%29.aspx) - they
should be fully GC-able...
We can also live with an explicit "Dispose()"-Method to clean up art
I don't want to make it sound like I know more than I do; the discussion on
work item 20399 makes it clear that I don't accurately remember all of the
specifics around this issue. But I do recall that we looked at using
collectible assemblies and decided against it. We were still committed to
suppo
