Hi ironpython,
Here's your Daily Digest of new issues for project "IronPython".
In today's digest:ISSUES
1. [New comment] StackOverflow when enumerating dynamic members of IMOs
2. [New issue] package get confused as module during import
--
ISSUES
1.
(Blast! When I hit I failed to edit the CC list, so my message
went directly to Pawel ... so when HE hit reply, his message went directly
to me. Confusion reigns.)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pawel Jasinski
Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] I
Sorry, it happens to me all the time, I reply to person and forget
about mailing list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Pawel Jasinski
Date: Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] Item 34263 in 2.7.5?
To: "Vernon D. Cole"
I agree with Vernon.
My typical use c
Hi,
This workaround is working well, but will there be a fix to IronPython
so it isn't needed?
I need to give feedback to the SymPy people.
Thanks! Andy
On 4/9/2014 10:02 AM, Pawel Jasinski wrote:
> Here is the workaround which let me install the package:
>
> *** sympy/__init__.py.orig 20
I have opened a cp: https://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/35116
I have a fix, but before push request I need to check if it doesn't
break something else.
It needs a to be reviewed and hopefully it is not to late for 2.7.5.
--pawel
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Andrew Ayre wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Vernon D. Cole wrote:
> -1 on version number 3.0.
>
> Just last week I was in a complete panic when I discovered that the version
> of Python embedded in moneydance was "Jython 2.0". After some frantic
> searching, I discovered that Jython 2.0 implements Python 2.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Pawel Jasinski
wrote:
> I have opened a cp: https://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/35116
> I have a fix, but before push request I need to check if it doesn't
> break something else.
> It needs a to be reviewed and hopefully it is not to late for 2.7.5.
You'll
Jeff Hardy stated:..
> In addition, 3.0 will include most (but perhaps not all!) of 3.4's
> features, mainly because I'd like to see a release later this year
> (around October) and things like nonlocal or importlib could slip
> because they're hard and not terribly exciting. Calling a release lik
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Vernon D. Cole wrote:
> Jeff Hardy stated:..
>>
>> In addition, 3.0 will include most (but perhaps not all!) of 3.4's
>> features, mainly because I'd like to see a release later this year
>> (around October) and things like nonlocal or importlib could slip
>> beca
