It is. The test is fully local.
-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Schementi
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 10:04 PM
To: Jim Deville; IronRuby External Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: RE: Code Review: firewallwarning
This if fine as long as only this machine hits the serve
This if fine as long as only this machine hits the server ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Deville
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 9:59 PM
> To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers
> Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Code Review: firewallwarning
>
> RESENDING with diff:
> tfpt revi
tfpt review "/shelveset:irinfo;REDMOND\jdeville"
Comment :
Tag and other changes to get ironruby.info running again. Also fixes crmail
to work with new Merlin External path.
irinfo.diff
Description: irinfo.diff
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
I
RESENDING with diff:
tfpt review "/shelveset:firewallwarning;REDMOND\jdeville"
Comment :
This simple change fixes a firewall warning that gets kicked up in the test
lab. The change is simply to change the listening address from 0.0.0.0 (bind on
all addresses) to 127.0.0.1 (loopback).
fi
tfpt review "/shelveset:irinfo;REDMOND\jdeville"
Comment :
Tag and other changes to get ironruby.info running again.
irinfo.diff
Description: irinfo.diff
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/li
tfpt review "/shelveset:firewallwarning;REDMOND\jdeville"
Comment :
This simple change fixes a firewall warning that gets kicked up when running
Net::HTTP specs. The change is simply to change the listening address from
0.0.0.0 (bind on all addresses) to 127.0.0.1 (loopback).
firewallw
PrivateBinding doesn't mostly work in IronRuby yet (we will fix that). Note
that the call to a private method/reading a private field will be much slower
than if it was public. Also, it won't work in partial trust (anywhere where
your app is not granted full access to all .NET features, like in
Yes, that's right. As Jim said, you can use -X:PrivateBinding to work around
this, but I don't remember if this has any other consequences.
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 4:57 PM
To: iro
If you don't mind running debug, you can also use -X:PrivateBindings
-Original Message-
From: Curt Hagenlocher
Sent: May 04, 2009 4:41 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Clr Interop and private member variables
Make it protected instead of private?
From: i
It's not my code :-)
It appears as though "extending" a class in ruby is more or less the same as
creating a derived class... is this right?
Might have to convince the other guy that "restricted by default" is not the
best philosophy...
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
>
Make it protected instead of private?
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Orion Edwards
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 4:32 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: [Ironruby-core] Clr Interop and private member variables
I have the
I have the following C# class
namespace MyNamespace
{
public class MyObject
{
private string m_Name;
}
}
and I'm extending it from IronRuby
class MyNameSpace::MyObject
def printme
puts m_Name
end
end
When I try to run this, I get undefined method `m_Name' for
MyNameSpace::MyObj
Hello Shri,
Because the spec passed by accident, I was checked result by this
code snippet
require 'time'
t1 = (Time.utc(1976, 8, 26, 14, 30) + 4 * 3600)
t2 = Time.rfc2822("26 Aug 76 14:30 EDT")
puts "#{t1} == #{t2}? #{t1==t2}"
MRI:
Thu Aug 26 18:30:00 UTC 1976 == Fri Aug 27 01:30:00 +0700
Hi Tomas,
1) Oh, I see. I didn't know that, and the fact that it was working
with previous versions of IR just misleaded me.
2) Indeed, I know it was wrong to create a new site on each invocation
and that's exactly why I'm reviewing the oldest bits of code that
actually interact with IronRuby to c
A couple of issues:
1) As Shri said, the return type of a site must be Object.
2) You shouldn't be creating a new site (and also not a shared one) in each
invocation of the method. Instead, use one of the CallSiteStorages defined in
CallSiteStorages.cs as the first parameter. You can search in th
Hello Shri,
Thank you very much for code review. It is make sense about
constructors and ToString methods. I will work on it.
p.s. please delete bug #1021 for me.
Thank you,
-Jirapong
On May 4, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Shri Borde wrote:
The approach looks good. I have some comments though...
Yo
Sorry... I just looked at the source code and events are indeed not implemented
yet. I promised Tomas I'd try really really hard to finish the typegen code
this month, so you shouldn't have to wait too long.
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org]
No dice i'm afraid:
with 'add_my_event':
Snippets.scripting:0:in `add_MyEvent': undefined method `add_MyEvent' for
IronRuby.Classes.Object$5:ClassWithEvent (NoMethodError)
from ClassLibrary:0:in `RegisterEvent'
from experiment1.rb:90
with 'add_MyEvent':
Snippets.scripting:0:in `a
I believe that this should work, but the name would need to be Rubified as
"add_my_event".
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Mark Ryall
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 6:02 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: [Ironruby-core] cl
Hi everyone,
I'm messing around with trying to create ironruby mock (actually recorder)
implementations of various sorts of CLR type features and am struggling with
events.
Is it currently possible to create an implementation of a CLR interface that
contains an event?
For example
using System;
I tried running the ActiveSupport tests. The results tally is :
1659 tests, 154 errors and failures
The log is at http://gist.github.com/106363 if you want to see the kinds of
failures IronRuby runs into. Instructions for running the tests is at the
bottom of http://www.ironruby
Why did you need to disable two examples in rfc2822_spec.rb? We should not be
disabling tests that worked before without a very good reason.
You added a test for Time.utc. That should actually be in the second describe
block in the same file for Time#utc. The (grammatically correct) name of the
The approach looks good. I have some comments though...
You should do a search for "DateTime" in the code base to find all the places
that might need updating. For example, Yaml.DateTimeOps needs to be changed (is
there no spec for it?), and Converter.IsIntegral might need to be.
RubyDateTime s
23 matches
Mail list logo
