[Ironruby-core] Pair programming next week

2009-10-29 Thread Shri Borde
The last few pair programming sessions had worked out very well. Since its been a while since we did one, I want to find out if anyone is interested in doing in again next week. Reply (just to me) if you have an IronRuby-task (some suggestions at http://wiki.github.com/ironruby/ironruby/contribu

Re: [Ironruby-core] Open source project to port

2009-10-29 Thread Ivan Porto Carrero
Thanks for the input :) Yes I was planning of looking at the code of some of the gems and rails plugins. They may have good ideas to include in this project. I don't expect that it will take a very long time to build this thing and of course any help is much appreciated. Exactly from POV of the D

Re: [Ironruby-core] Platform

2009-10-29 Thread Nathan Stults
Very nice, thank you From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Shri Borde Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:29 AM To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Platform You can use this construct: >>> defined? RU

Re: [Ironruby-core] Open source project to port

2009-10-29 Thread Nathan Stults
That’s a fun one because it involves a good opportunity to create a Ruby DSL, which will be a good demo for a book. I wrote a state machine DSL using Boo way back when using Ayende Rahein’s book on the topic (http://www.codeplex.com/SimpleStateMachine) and although Boo provides some meta-progr

Re: [Ironruby-core] Open source project to port

2009-10-29 Thread Ivan Porto Carrero
Seo started with the ironmagick gem :) Ryan pointed me towards this little library/application, it seems to be the right size and is fairly interesting: http://code.google.com/p/stateless unless somebody has a better idea it will pop up in my ironrubyinaction repository somewhere next week. --- M

Re: [Ironruby-core] Platform

2009-10-29 Thread Ivan Porto Carrero
I use IRONRUBY_VERSION require 'caricature/clr' if defined?(IRONRUBY_VERSION) But we do need to find a way to "fix" the rbconfig file because it would be good to interrogate that sometimes. --- Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations Ivan Porto Carrero Blog: http://flanders.co.nz Tw

Re: [Ironruby-core] Platform

2009-10-29 Thread Shri Borde
You can use this construct: >>> defined? RUBY_ENGINE and RUBY_ENGINE == "ironruby" => true From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Nathan Stults Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:26 AM To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org Subject: [Ironrub

[Ironruby-core] Platform

2009-10-29 Thread Nathan Stults
I noticed that the PLATFORM and RUBY_PLATFORM constants returns the same string when running from MRI as from IronRuby. Is there a standard Ruby constant or Kernel method or something that will indicate that the interpreter is IronRuby as opposed to MRI? While it is certainly true that the OS is th