On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 08:07, Will Green w...@hotgazpacho.org wrote:
I would appreciate if someone running the latest from git would try
ir -S gem install iron-term-ansicolor
on both the .Net 2 and the .Net 4 runtimes, and let me know which gem gets
installed.
Thanks, Daniele!
I've got three version of iron-term-ansicolor out there on RubyGems.org:
- iron-term-ansicolor-0.0.3 (gemspec.platform=ruby)
- iron-term-ansicolor-0.0.3-universal-.net
(gemspec.platform=universal-.net)
-
My guess is that RubyGems tries to look for an exact platform match first. If
there is no exact match, it somehow prefers “ruby” over other platforms.
Btw, you could just change clr_version in
Merlin\Main\Languages\Ruby\Libs\rbconfig.rb to “4.0” to simulate running on
.NET 4. After doing this
Will, could you recreate the universal-.net gem again and push it? I think it
might have been created incorrectly. The persisted Gem::Specification has
@new_platform and @original_platform set to “universal-unknown” which might
happen if you create it with MRI as I had mentioned below…
From:
I’m also wondering what will happen if you put the gem on two different gem
servers (if that is possible, like github and rubyforge). Does gem attempt all
sources to find the most specific? Or does it go with the most specific gem
from the first source?
JD
From:
Unless Ivan objects, I'm going to add this to a sample library I'm including in
rc3. We can discuss moving it to core after post 1.0 plans are final.
JD
-Original Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Miguel Madero
:)
--
Miguel A. Madero Reyes
www.miguelmadero.com (blog)
m...@miguelmadero.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
