Interpreter change looks good.
From: Tomas Matousek
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 4:08 PM
To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers; DLR Code Reviews
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Code Review: CompositeConversions3
tfpt review "/shelveset:CompositeConversions3;REDMOND\tomat"
DLR change (
DLR changes look good too.
From: Curt Hagenlocher
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 1:41 PM
To: Tomas Matousek; IronRuby External Code Reviewers; DLR Code Reviews
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: RE: Code Review: InitAndScopes6
Awesome! Ruby changes are good (other than a typo "bidning" in
DLR change looks great!
From: Shri Borde
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:39 PM
To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers; Rowan Code Reviewers; DLR Code Reviews
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Code Review: IronRuby Thread fixes
Affects: Microsoft.Scripting.Core.dll and IronRuby
tfpt
Ivan Porto Carrero:
> I can't work out how I can read external xaml files from Silverlight
> with IronRuby.
> I've tried to use System::IO::File and StreamReader but both give me a
> MethodAccessException.
>
> How would I accomplish reading a xaml file in the xap with IronRuby
> and Silverlight.
>
Softmind Technology:
> Can you kindly give a rough estimate deadline for this.
I think you answered your own question:
> It is understood that it will be out in the second half of 2008.
>
> But Second half means between June to December 2008.
- John
Michael Letterle:
> Alright, I started doing this tonight (finally) GZip was pretty
> straight forward, but Inflate may be a problem, The
> System::IO::Compression.DeflateStream is RFC 1951 compliant /not/
> 1950.. Meaning it only covers Deflate, not ZLib in general. See here:
> https://connect.
Robert Brotherus:
> Consider following program (test.rb):
>
> puts 'aaabbbaaa'.match('aaa').length
> puts 'aaabbbaaa'.match('x').length
>
> With CRuby, the result or running is:
>
> [08:49:31 ~] ruby test.rb
> 1
> test.rb:2: undefined method `length' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
>
> With IronR
Tomas Restrepo:
> >
> > We try to be smart about storing it on the object for types that we
> generate, but if it's a .NET object sometimes we have to go through a
> dictionary lookup to find the instance data for a given object.
>
> Is the object itself the key for that dictionary? (If yes, I'm
Tomas Restrepo:
> > > - What's the relationship between what goes around a RubyClass for
> > a > given type (in the case of .net objects) and the whole
> > InstanceData > business?
> >
> > Not sure about this question ... can you clarify?
>
> I was referring to RubyExecutionContext.GetInstance
FYI, we're hiring! See below.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dino Viehland
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 11:57 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: [IronPython] Our team is growing!
Hi everyone! I just wanted to let you know that our team is growing and w
Michael Letterle:
> Yes, my only point is that the way it works today a .NET class becomes
> a Ruby class and a .NET method becomes a Ruby method. Nothing is
> stopping one from writing a .NET assembly so that it "feels" like Ruby
> when it's compiled.
>
> That said, I can see the advantage of be
Michael Letterle:
> What do you see would be the advantage of something like this as
> opposed to the current method of loading .NET assemblies? I mean you
> could use something like OpenSSL.NET
> (http://openssl-net.sourceforge.net/) today to implement ssl in
> IronRuby for example
The main reas
12 matches
Mail list logo
