There are two important parts to testing IronRuby-Rack:
First, we need to make sure IronRuby can run rack 1.2. This will be a subset of
the tests as rack has tests for mongrel and thin, which we won't be able to
run, but the webrick test is fair game. The rack tests are checked into
external/la
I may also be interested in contributing to move IronRuby.Rack toward
rack-1.2.0 compatibility.
I would imagine (but this could be totally wrong) that we would want to move
more tests over from:
https://github.com/chneukirchen/rack/tree/master/test
Would this be a good approach?
Where would be a
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Eduardo Blumenfeld
wrote:
> IronRuby 1.1.2 is working really good in production for wpf
> applications.
> Do you know the status of the IronRuby-Rack project?
Not much going on. Should at least make sure it's rack-1.2.0 compatible.
> Is there any way to contribut
Eduardo Blumenfeld wrote in post #982472:
Hi all,
IronRuby 1.1.2 is working really good in production for wpf
applications.
Do you know the status of the IronRuby-Rack project?
Is there any way to contribute?
Eduardo
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_
Hi all,
IronRuby 1.1.2 is really working good...
I was trying to see what is the status of this project,
it seems to be no longer in the original path in github.
Is there any news-updates on that?
Is there any way to contribute to the project?
Regards
Eduardo
Eduardo Blumenfeld wrote in post
Hi all,
First, thank you for all the effort put in this project.
Is there any news on this particular project (ironruby-rack gem), going
forward with the release 1.1.1?
Eduardo
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
