Re: [isabelle-dev] (Re-)introducing set as a type constructor rather than as mere abbreviation

2011-09-03 Thread Florian Haftmann
Hi again, thanks Alex for the summary. So, it seems that we can conclude that instead of the nice unified development that we hoped for in 2008, we got quite a bit of confusion (points 1.1 and 1.2), in addition to the drawbacks that were already known (1.3, 1.5-1.6). If we had to choose

Re: [isabelle-dev] (Re-)introducing set as a type constructor rather than as mere abbreviation

2011-09-03 Thread Christian Urban
Quoting Florian Haftmann florian.haftm...@informatik.tu-muenchen.de: I will now examine HOL-Nominal more closer, and after that come up with a next report about the distribution. There should be no problems in principle. Early versions of Nominal (1) worked perfectly with an explicit