Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Alexander Krauss wrote: The practical issues it adresses: It gives you convenient and fast feedback about whether Isabelle_makeall on your changeset(s) succeeds. In particular, it is useful if you do not have a fast machine for yourself. It also makes the results persist

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Alexander Krauss
On 02/24/2012 04:23 PM, Makarius wrote: Where do I have to look for explanations about testboard? It would help to understand the practical issues that it addresses, so that the emerging renovations of the build and test process of Isabelle/Scala move in the same general direction. I posted som

Re: [isabelle-dev] Quickcheck Examples

2012-02-24 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: Maybe we could also get performance measurements for the new session? See now 1258eab48270. I have also updated the IsaMakefile itself in 2190af0ef263. All this redundancy in the session management is well-known and waiting to be eliminated for many

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Florian Haftmann wrote: A nice client-side solution is also: [paths] testboard = ssh://haftmann@macbroy//mnt/tmp/isatest/repositories/isabelle [alias] push_to_testboard = push -f testboard in .hg/hgrc Very nice indeed; these Mercurial guys know what is needed. This

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Florian Haftmann wrote: I would also prefer a server-side solution in the testboard repositories This usually means hooks, but hooks are not very useful with the direct user access model that we have, via the local file-system and possibly indirected via ssh. It require

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Florian Haftmann
> Indeed. I would also prefer a server-side solution in the testboard > repositories (is there any way to permit a push generating new heads in > .hg/hgrc?) A nice client-side solution is also: > [paths] > testboard = ssh://haftmann@macbroy//mnt/tmp/isatest/repositories/isabelle > [alias] > pus

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Florian Haftmann
Hi all, >> It is also possible to have .hg/hgrc specific to individual repository >> clones. So if testboard users are instructed to augment only that >> hgrc with the evil option once and for all, the problem of getting >> used to evil command lines in a different context is avoided. > > This t

Re: [isabelle-dev] Quickcheck Examples

2012-02-24 Thread Florian Haftmann
Hi Lukas, Am 24.02.2012 09:09, schrieb Lukas Bulwahn: > On 02/18/2012 10:18 AM, Florian Haftmann wrote: >>> How much relative time do the quickcheck examples in HOL-ex take? >>> According to my feeling time could be high to separate these into a >>> separate session, to facilitate maintenance. >>>

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Makarius wrote: It is also possible to have .hg/hgrc specific to individual repository clones. So if testboard users are instructed to augment only that hgrc with the evil option once and for all, the problem of getting used to evil command lines in a different context is

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: On 02/24/2012 09:01 AM, Florian Haftmann wrote: Accidentally I have pushed something into the main repository which was still supposed to be tested. PLEASE IGNORE HEAD REVISION 0bd7c16a4200 and continue with the other head. Sorry for this, Flori

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Jasmin Christian Blanchette
Am 24.02.2012 um 09:16 schrieb Lukas Bulwahn: > I was close to this mistake myself a couple of times already. > > It is the "evil" -f option with is now standard when pushing to the testboard > -- accidently pushing to the public repository (with -f) is then done without > checking as well. >

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Lars Noschinski
On 24.02.2012 09:16, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: On 02/24/2012 09:01 AM, Florian Haftmann wrote: Accidentally I have pushed something into the main repository which was still supposed to be tested. PLEASE IGNORE HEAD REVISION 0bd7c16a4200 and continue with the other head. Sorry for this, Florian I

Re: [isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Lukas Bulwahn
On 02/24/2012 09:01 AM, Florian Haftmann wrote: Accidentally I have pushed something into the main repository which was still supposed to be tested. PLEASE IGNORE HEAD REVISION 0bd7c16a4200 and continue with the other head. Sorry for this, Florian I was close to this mistake myself a c

Re: [isabelle-dev] Quickcheck Examples

2012-02-24 Thread Lukas Bulwahn
On 02/18/2012 10:18 AM, Florian Haftmann wrote: How much relative time do the quickcheck examples in HOL-ex take? According to my feeling time could be high to separate these into a separate session, to facilitate maintenance. I separated the Quickcheck-Examples from HOL-ex into an own session (

[isabelle-dev] Small repository accident

2012-02-24 Thread Florian Haftmann
Accidentally I have pushed something into the main repository which was still supposed to be tested. PLEASE IGNORE HEAD REVISION 0bd7c16a4200 and continue with the other head. Sorry for this, Florian -- PGP available: http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftman