On 29/06/18 19:31, Lars Hupel wrote:
>> Does it mean that the great new hardware is now locked up and
>> exclusively available for Jenkins?
>
> That assessment is accurate.
That is bad.
It means that the development process will continue to decline, as we
have seen in the past few years -- it
Does it mean that the great new hardware is now locked up and
exclusively available for Jenkins?
That assessment is accurate.
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
On 28/06/18 11:41, Lars Hupel wrote:
> Dear Isabelle developers,
>
> you may have already noticed that some Jenkins jobs got reconfigured.
>
> The following changes are relevant for developers:
>
> - The new job "isabelle-all" runs Isabelle+AFP together, incrementally.
> This should improve
> - The "testboard" job will also be replaced to run Isabelle+AFP
> together. Historic builds will be deleted, as they are not relevant for
> the official history.
I have implemented this now. I'm currently monitoring the situation, but
so far, it seems like this sped up the process overall.
Dear Isabelle developers,
you may have already noticed that some Jenkins jobs got reconfigured.
The following changes are relevant for developers:
- The new job "isabelle-all" runs Isabelle+AFP together, incrementally.
This should improve overall performance and avoid double builds. There
is,
