Re: [isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Tobias Nipkow
Am 17/08/2012 21:51, schrieb Christian Urban: > > > On Friday, August 17, 2012 at 21:18:35 (+0200), Makarius wrote: > > Tjark, you have no business here. > > I assume something got here lost in translation. > Otherwise, we should all make reasonable effort > to welcome everybody on both, the is

[isabelle-dev] Rules of conduct

2012-08-17 Thread Alexander Krauss
Dear all, Tjark, you have no business here. This is, finally, too much for me! I trust that the community as a whole will come to the conclusion that the quoted reaction is completely inapproriate. In particular since any rules that may have been violated are not clearly stated anywhere

Re: [isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Tjark Weber
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 21:57 +0200, Makarius wrote: > Tjark has violated a bit too many rules of conduct in too short time, > basically abusing his historic administrator privileges on the > Isabelle repository. In the past week, I made minor modifications to a two-week-old maintenance script of F

Re: [isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Christian Urban wrote: On Friday, August 17, 2012 at 21:18:35 (+0200), Makarius wrote: > Tjark, you have no business here. I assume something got here lost in translation. Otherwise, we should all make reasonable effort to welcome everybody on both, the isabelle-users and

Re: [isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Christian Urban
On Friday, August 17, 2012 at 21:18:35 (+0200), Makarius wrote: > Tjark, you have no business here. I assume something got here lost in translation. Otherwise, we should all make reasonable effort to welcome everybody on both, the isabelle-users and isabelle-dev lists. After all, we like to hav

Re: [isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Makarius
Tjark, you have no business here. If you want to propose changes to the Isabelle repository, you can send them the via email as hg changeset. Makarius ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-mue

Re: [isabelle-dev] PLATFORMS

2012-08-17 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Clemens Ballarin wrote: Any chance of still working on Leopard if I neither use jEdit nor any of the external provers? Basically no. I also need to ugrade my own MacBook Pro after so many years of Leopard. Makarius

Re: [isabelle-dev] PLATFORMS

2012-08-17 Thread Clemens Ballarin
Any chance of still working on Leopard if I neither use jEdit nor any of the external provers? Clemens Quoting Makarius : Isabelle/10584ca5785f has an updated version of Admin/PLATFORMS. Executive summary: * Mac OS Mountain Lion is now supported (macbroy30) * Mac OS Leopard has been

[isabelle-dev] isabelle components

2012-08-17 Thread Makarius
Various changes leading up to Isabelle/ae7429d66b1e attempt to disentangle the component situation on the Isabelle repository, as opposed to regular releases. See the end of README_REPOSITORY and the system manual on "Add-on components" and the "isabelle components" tool. Short version: *

[isabelle-dev] PLATFORMS

2012-08-17 Thread Makarius
Isabelle/10584ca5785f has an updated version of Admin/PLATFORMS. Executive summary: * Mac OS Mountain Lion is now supported (macbroy30) * Mac OS Leopard has been discontinued * old 32 bit Mac hardware is no longer usable (lack of Java 7) * explicit ISABELLE_PLATFORM32 helps to make th

Re: [isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Tjark Weber
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 15:15 +0200, Makarius wrote: > If you need shortcuts, use existing shell alias or scripting facilities. > You can even make your private Isabelle tools by augmenting ISABELLE_TOOLS > and *not* pushing anything like that on the official repository. Sure, but wouldn't the same

Re: [isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Tobias Nipkow wrote: Am 17/08/2012 15:15, schrieb Makarius: I count this as trolling on this mailing list. We all have our pet peeves. Tjark can express that somewhere privately, not here on this mailing list. Makarius _

Re: [isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Tobias Nipkow
Am 17/08/2012 15:15, schrieb Makarius: > I count this as trolling on this mailing list. We all have our pet peeves. Tobias ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

Re: [isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Makarius
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012, Tjark Weber wrote: I had expected that ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS would allow me to specify default options for the "isabelle build" tool, for instance "-v" for verbose output. None of the regular tools ever had such a feature, for usedir it was merely a historical accident.

[isabelle-dev] the “algebra" proof method

2012-08-17 Thread Lawrence Paulson
As far as I am aware, we provide no documentation on the “algebra" proof method. My impression is that this method will prove anything that it can convert to the form p1 = 0 ==> … ==> pn = 0 ==> p = 0 where p1, …, pn, p are polynomials, possibly in multiple variables, over a suitable s

[isabelle-dev] Feature Request for ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS: Support "isabelle build" Options

2012-08-17 Thread Tjark Weber
Hi, I had expected that ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS would allow me to specify default options for the "isabelle build" tool, for instance "-v" for verbose output. In reality, ISABELLE_BUILD_OPTIONS are merely passed on to isabelle.Build, which has its own idea of valid options. I would suggest that "

Re: [isabelle-dev] http://isabelle.in.tum.de/testboard/

2012-08-17 Thread Tobias Nipkow
It looks like this has nothing to do with testboard but with the local infrastructure. Sorry. Tobias Am 17/08/2012 09:01, schrieb Tobias Nipkow: > Thanks for fixing it. Unfortunately I cannot push to it anymore, it asks me > for > a password. > > Tobias > > Am 16/08/2012 22:40, schrieb Alexand

Re: [isabelle-dev] http://isabelle.in.tum.de/testboard/

2012-08-17 Thread Tobias Nipkow
Thanks for fixing it. Unfortunately I cannot push to it anymore, it asks me for a password. Tobias Am 16/08/2012 22:40, schrieb Alexander Krauss: > Quoting Makarius : > >> The end of Python vomiting has this: >> >> : patch cannot be decoded >> args = ('patch cannot be decoded',) >> m