> What I see from this thread is that at some time we really have to talk
> about official build orders with respective hg ids, either using
> subrepos or whatever.
That is accurate. So far we have largely avoided the need to do that,
but with an ever growing AFP we need to figure out some
Am 04.07.2016 um 23:49 schrieb Lars Hupel:
>> The problem I was referring to is that in order to get a deeper idea
>> what's going on you want to have a look at the topology of the history.
>> However I guess this is closely related to my surprise that not both
>> patches to distro and AFP pushed
> On 5 Jul 2016, at 16:15, Lars Hupel wrote:
>
>> Another way of getting simultaneous tests would be to use subrepos. I.e.
>>
>> test-repo/
>> isabelle/ (subrepo)
>> afp/ (subrepo)
>>
>> The trigger would then be the push to test-repo, not to any of the subrepos,
>> and
> Another way of getting simultaneous tests would be to use subrepos. I.e.
>
> test-repo/
>isabelle/ (subrepo)
>afp/ (subrepo)
>
> The trigger would then be the push to test-repo, not to any of the subrepos,
> and you would get a predictable combination as well.
Right, that's one
Another way of getting simultaneous tests would be to use subrepos. I.e.
test-repo/
isabelle/ (subrepo)
afp/ (subrepo)
The trigger would then be the push to test-repo, not to any of the subrepos,
and you would get a predictable combination as well.
Cheers,
Gerwin
> On 5 Jul 2016,
> The problem I was referring to is that in order to get a deeper idea
> what's going on you want to have a look at the topology of the history.
> However I guess this is closely related to my surprise that not both
> patches to distro and AFP pushed in proximity have been considered as
> one
>> This is currently not implemented. Isabelle testboard will always use
>> AFP devel and vice versa. It is not possible to test Isabelle testboard
>> and AFP testboard together.
>
> But I regard this as a central use case: if a change to the distro
> demands changes in the AFP, you want to test
>> 3. Go to https://ci.isabelle.systems/jenkins/job/testboard-afp/ and
>> await new build run to be scheduled.
>
> There can currently only be one testboard build running at a time. That
> means you should wait to push until the previous run is finished.
>
> I understand that this is not ideal.
>> 1. Changesets to dist and AFP exist as hg patches.
>
> This is currently not implemented. Isabelle testboard will always use
> AFP devel and vice versa. It is not possible to test Isabelle testboard
> and AFP testboard together.
But I regard this as a central use case: if a change to the
To add to my last mail:
> 3. Go to https://ci.isabelle.systems/jenkins/job/testboard-afp/ and
> await new build run to be scheduled.
There can currently only be one testboard build running at a time. That
means you should wait to push until the previous run is finished.
I understand that this
Hi Florian,
thanks for your feedback! Commenting in some more detail will take me
some time, but for now a quick reply:
> 1. Changesets to dist and AFP exist as hg patches.
This is currently not implemented. Isabelle testboard will always use
AFP devel and vice versa. It is not possible to test
Hi all,
I have started to use the testboard and want to excite feedback on my
workflow, as well as hint to certain inconveniences in the current setup.
1. Changesets to dist and AFP exist as hg patches.
2. In both repositories:
hg push_to_testboard
where »push_to_testboard«
12 matches
Mail list logo