Re: [isabelle-dev] Aquamacs emacs

2010-05-17 Thread Makarius
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Makarius wrote: Right now I am bisecting our repository as David suggested, which is an interesting experience because last year's Isabelle/HOL builds really fast (factor 2 compared to today). I am close to get to the point, about 4 more bisections. The result is on the

Re: [isabelle-dev] Aquamacs emacs

2010-05-17 Thread Makarius
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Lawrence Paulson wrote: I'm puzzled that you run into problems so quickly. I think I have been using PG Version 4.0pre091204 for many months. And just recently, I found that the combination of it with Aquamacs-2.0 works smoothly in every way: fonts, cut and paste, etc. Onc

Re: [isabelle-dev] Aquamacs emacs

2010-05-17 Thread Lawrence Paulson
I'm puzzled that you run into problems so quickly. I think I have been using PG Version 4.0pre091204 for many months. And just recently, I found that the combination of it with Aquamacs-2.0 works smoothly in every way: fonts, cut and paste, etc. Once something locked up and I had to start it aga

Re: [isabelle-dev] Aquamacs emacs

2010-05-17 Thread David Aspinall
I have tried Aquamacs-2.0 with the CVS version of Proof General (from 12-Apr-2010) for 20min, and ran into two problems within the first 5min. One was due to Aquamacs failing to configure fonts for the buffer. The other was PG trac item #314 (Duplication of some special messages). These mysteri

Re: [isabelle-dev] Aquamacs emacs

2010-05-17 Thread Makarius
On Sat, 15 May 2010, Lawrence Paulson wrote: I've used PG Version 4.0pre091204 quite a bit, no problems. What goes wrong with it? I have tried Aquamacs-2.0 with the CVS version of Proof General (from 12-Apr-2010) for 20min, and ran into two problems within the first 5min. One was due to Aqu

Re: [isabelle-dev] Aquamacs emacs

2010-05-15 Thread Lawrence Paulson
I've used PG Version 4.0pre091204 quite a bit, no problems. What goes wrong with it? Larry On 15 May 2010, at 15:32, Makarius wrote: > Which version of PG 4 is this? I only know of ProofGeneral-4.0pre091204.tgz, > and the repository version seems to be mostly identical to that, which means >

Re: [isabelle-dev] Aquamacs emacs

2010-05-15 Thread Makarius
On Sat, 15 May 2010, Lawrence Paulson wrote: Aquamacs 2.0 was released last week (http://aquamacs.org/), and it seems to be very much better than previous versions. I have been using it without difficulties in conjunction with proof general 4.0. I didn't notice any of the old problems. Symbols

[isabelle-dev] Aquamacs emacs

2010-05-15 Thread Lawrence Paulson
Aquamacs 2.0 was released last week (http://aquamacs.org/), and it seems to be very much better than previous versions. I have been using it without difficulties in conjunction with proof general 4.0. I didn't notice any of the old problems. Symbols display correctly; cut and paste work correctl