On 29/08/17 15:16, Manuel Eberl wrote:
> Is it intentional that the "Computational_Algebra" theory does not
> import "Polynomial_Factorial"?
I guess so. A comment in ROOT says (*conflicting type class
instantiations and dependent applications*), see
> Is it intentional that the "Computational_Algebra" theory does not
> import "Polynomial_Factorial"?
Yes. Polynomial_Factorial requires Field_as_Ring, which does a
substantial modification to the type class hierarchy, pulling it apart
from long-established traditions in HOL-Main. I have been
Is it intentional that the "Computational_Algebra" theory does not
import "Polynomial_Factorial"?
Manuel
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
