Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-18 Thread Manuel Eberl
On 2017-07-05 22:09, Manuel Eberl wrote: > I still want to take care of two really tiny things: […] and the proper > printing > of "nat" values as numerals instead of successor notation. This is now done as of adf3155c57e2. I should note that I was somewhat imprecise, by ‘printing of "nat"

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-16 Thread Lawrence Paulson
I’ve been using it a bit and it’s pretty useful! Thanks Larry > On 9 Jul 2017, at 17:16, Fabian Immler wrote: > > A while ago, Florian Haftmann sent a command that does something like this to > the mailing list [1]. I attach a version that works with current > Isabelle2016-1

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-09 Thread Fabian Immler
A while ago, Florian Haftmann sent a command that does something like this to the mailing list [1]. I attach a version that works with current Isabelle2016-1 (not sure if I got all the modifications right, but it seems to work at least on the example in the .thy file). Fabian [1]

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-09 Thread Lars Hupel
I currently supervise a student who's investigating proof refactoring. One possible outcome of this would be a tool that also does what you suggested. It's a little too early to tell, though. Cheers Lars On 8 July 2017 23:28:42 CEST, Lawrence Paulson wrote: >No, that’s

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-08 Thread Lawrence Paulson
No, that’s precisely what I’d like to avoid. I prefer texts that you can actually read. It would be great to have something automatically generated, even if it needed manual tweaking (e.g. to rename variables). And I’ve gone to some effort purging instances of “guess” from existing proofs.

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-08 Thread Lawrence Paulson
I am always using the new auto-complete facility for proof (cases “...”) and for induction. But could this be done for “proof" with any method, simply copying out the states of the subgoals? Then people would make a lot less use of “subgoals”, etc. Larry > On 5 Jul 2017, at 21:04,

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-06 Thread Blanchette, J.C.
Hi Makarius, > Is there anything else to take into account for this late-summer release > process? Simon Cruanes (cc:) and I are still working on Nunchaku, which we intend to become Nitpick's successor. I have some patches locally that move the current "Nunchaku.thy" to Main (it's not much

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-05 Thread Manuel Eberl
Nothing fancy, just a couple of code_post rules to rewrite successor notation into numeral notation after evaluation and before printing. I don't know if there's a better way to do that, but I think we discussed this on the mailing list a while ago and came to the conclusion that code_post is

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-05 Thread Lawrence Paulson
What’s the idea here? Larry > On 5 Jul 2017, at 21:09, Manuel Eberl wrote: > > the proper printing of "nat" values as numerals instead of successor notation. ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-05 Thread Manuel Eberl
I still want to take care of two really tiny things: the "subseq" situation and the proper printing of "nat" values as numerals instead of successor notation. Just mentioning that for the sake of completeness. Manuel On 2017-07-05 21:04, Makarius wrote: > Dear all, > > we are now almost 7

[isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-05 Thread Makarius
Dear all, we are now almost 7 months after Isabelle2016-1 (December 2016). Following the standard schedule, the Isabelle2017 release should appear at the start of October 2017. During the last 3 weeks in July, I will be in Cambridge. That is also a possibility to show me old and new problems in

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-09-30 Thread Makarius
Dear all, this is the last call for small amendments and finalization on the main Isabelle repository. Unless there are any last-minute surprises, the fork for Isabelle2013-1 will happen Thu 03-Oct-2013. This means the history of the official release will continue on

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-09-24 Thread Makarius
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Makarius wrote: The first release candidates of Isabelle2013-1 will probably happen in the first or second week of October. How is the general situation? And especially the situation for HOL-BNF? Is it feasible to target the first week of October for Isabelle2013-1-RC1?

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-09-24 Thread Jasmin Christian Blanchette
The first release candidates of Isabelle2013-1 will probably happen in the first or second week of October. How is the general situation? And especially the situation for HOL-BNF? HOL-BNF is a long-term construction yard. There happens to be a lot of development these days, but it's

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-09-24 Thread Makarius
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Jasmin Christian Blanchette wrote: As far as HOL-BNF is concerned, you can branch any time. What doesn't make it in this release will make it into the next one. OK, I will tell you when we are getting close to the fork point. Just formally for a proper release, you need

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-09-24 Thread Jasmin Blanchette
Am 24.09.2013 um 22:10 schrieb Makarius makar...@sketis.net: OK, I will tell you when we are getting close to the fork point. Thanks. We'll try to maintain the ready to be forked invariant, but it's always good to have advance notice, if nothing else so that we avoid bigger changes right

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-09-24 Thread Makarius
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, Jasmin Blanchette wrote: 54c8dee1295a should address that. BTW, Pretty.item allows to make nice square bullets for itemization (visible in Isabelle/jEdit only). Do you have a specific use in mind w.r.t. BNF or is this just a general hint (e.g. for Sledgehammer and

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-09-02 Thread Makarius
The French summer vacation period has ended, so I've switched myself now into consolidation mode to put things into shape for release. The first release candidates of Isabelle2013-1 will probably happen in the first or second week of October. Makarius

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-09-02 Thread Tobias Nipkow
The earlier the better because, as I told you at ITP, I have a course starting in the middle of October and they need to use a new Isabelle, in the worst case a release candidate. Tobias Am 02/09/2013 15:37, schrieb Makarius: The French summer vacation period has ended, so I've switched myself

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-08-24 Thread Alexander Krauss
On 08/17/2013 04:05 PM, Makarius wrote: in the past few weeks the coming release has been mentioned in passing several times. So far the precise schedule is not clear, but just from the distance to Isabelle2013 and the amount of material that is about to be finished for Isabelle2013-1, it has

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-08-21 Thread Florian Haftmann
So the time to point out further issues or pending projects is now -- apart from the well-known HOL-BNF and PIDE improvements that are already underway. In general there is no reason to rush anything on any particular release train, since they are rather frequent anyway. A release is a

[isabelle-dev] The coming release

2013-08-17 Thread Makarius
Dear all, in the past few weeks the coming release has been mentioned in passing several times. So far the precise schedule is not clear, but just from the distance to Isabelle2013 and the amount of material that is about to be finished for Isabelle2013-1, it has to be rather soon after the