Currently heating my CPU with test-building the patch ...
If everything goes fine, I will push it.
--
Peter
On Do, 2015-11-19 at 10:46 +0100, Florian Haftmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> >> These suggestions are worth a discussion. Should we go ahead? Would
> anybody like to apply this patch and
Hi all,
>> These suggestions are worth a discussion. Should we go ahead? Would
anybody like to apply this patch and test that everything still works?
>
> I could do it, if nobody has objections.
I see no obstacles in going ahead. What requires some thought is the
material in ex/ directories is
As I recall, the Library directory get special treatment. But I forget what
this special treatment consists of. It might make sense to move this particular
entry to Library.
Larry
> On 19 Nov 2015, at 09:46, Florian Haftmann
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On 18.11.2015, at 16:26, Lawrence Paulson wrote:
>
> These suggestions are worth a discussion. Should we go ahead? Would anybody
> like to apply this patch and test that everything still works?
I could do it, if nobody has objections.
Jasmin
Hi,
Can someone please apply the attached patch to Isabelle for me?
It does three things:
- generalises Imperative_Quicksort to work on linearly-ordered,
heap-representable types, and not just nat
- renames Sublist to List_Sublist to avoid clashing with HOL/Library/Sublist
- mildly weakens the
… and this time with the patch …
> On 15 Nov 2015, at 22:15, Peter Gammie wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please apply the attached patch to Isabelle for me?
>
> It does three things:
> - generalises Imperative_Quicksort to work on linearly-ordered,
> heap-representable