Hi Lars,
> However, turns out that the actual problem was that somebody pushed
> something completely unrelated (maybe a different repository?) into
> testboard. This also generated a gargantuan changelog in Jenkins. I
> don't blame that person, it could happen to anyone. But we need to fix
>
> Was it me? I think I saw a warning to that effect, but with "-f"
> (which is necessary since we're creating new heads) it's too late
> once the warning is shown. I can easily change the trusty old script
> I use to push to testboard to make sure I do it from my Isabelle
> repository. If it
Hi Lars,
I am unsure if an Isabelle tool is the right level of abstraction for an
operation, only members of the isabelle (UNIX) group at TUM can/should execute.
Also, wouldn’t a push to a fresh repository take quite long. (OK, negligible
compared to the actual build, but still.) And one still
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Dmitriy Traytel wrote:
I am unsure if an Isabelle tool is the right level of abstraction for an
operation, only members of the isabelle (UNIX) group at TUM can/should
execute.
BTW, the Isabelle tool name space is not hardwired. Any "component" can
add new tool
> On 16 Feb 2016, at 11:30, Makarius wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016, Dmitriy Traytel wrote:
>
>> I am unsure if an Isabelle tool is the right level of abstraction for an
>> operation, only members of the isabelle (UNIX) group at TUM can/should
>> execute.
>
> BTW, the