Re: [isabelle-dev] Isabelle (proof assistant) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2013-02-22 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi,

Am Freitag, den 22.02.2013, 08:49 +0100 schrieb Gergely Buday:
 Wiki is old-fashioned these days, how about using Stack Exchange for
 Isabelle user communication? 
 What do you think about this?

I guess this is getting off-topic for isabelle-dev and should rather be
discussed on the users list. Anyways: I find SE a good format for the
typical questions that are raised on the users list, but I am not sure
if the community is large enough to provide reasonable fast and good
answers there to make it useful. But it could be worth a try.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Dipl.-Math. Dipl.-Inform. Joachim Breitner
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter
http://pp.ipd.kit.edu/~breitner


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Isabelle (proof assistant) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2013-02-22 Thread Makarius

On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Joachim Breitner wrote:


Am Freitag, den 22.02.2013, 08:49 +0100 schrieb Gergely Buday:

Wiki is old-fashioned these days, how about using Stack Exchange for
Isabelle user communication?


I've asked myself this very question occasionally.  Just empirically by 
doing regular web search, I end up very often on Stack Exchange, e.g. for 
Java or JVM problems.  The reason why Java with all its problems still 
survives (and thrives) is that so many answers are available.




I guess this is getting off-topic for isabelle-dev and should rather be
discussed on the users list. Anyways: I find SE a good format for the
typical questions that are raised on the users list, but I am not sure
if the community is large enough to provide reasonable fast and good
answers there to make it useful. But it could be worth a try.


You are welcome to initiate a thread on isabelle-users.

I think the main question for most of us is how SE actually works, and 
what needs to be done to establish some foothold there.



Makarius
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Isabelle (proof assistant) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2013-02-21 Thread Gergely Buday
Makarius wrote:

 I am more concerned about this wiki here:
 https://isabelle.in.tum.de/community since it is provided by one of the
 established Isabelle sites.

 I would still like to see a genuine Isabelle community contributing here,
 and doing serious maintenance.  Right now it is just a scribbling board for
 people who were discontent with some of the official READMEs or manuals, and
 even that is often pointless already due to continuous updates of the
 official versions.

Wiki is old-fashioned these days, how about using Stack Exchange for
Isabelle user communication? It would open up Isabelle knowledge
contrasted to the user mailing list. Of course Isabelle is too narrow
a topic for an own site, but proposing a computational logic area
could be an idea, having all the provers and their fans there. Of
course using the existing cstheory and cs sites are options. The logic
one was closed down saying that it would draw users from the
philosophy site.

Here is how to suggest a site:

http://area51.stackexchange.com/faq

What do you think about this?

- Gergely
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Isabelle (proof assistant) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2013-02-20 Thread Makarius

On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Tobias Nipkow wrote:


It would be better to update it. The German version is also a bit odd...

Tobias

Am 19/02/2013 00:42, schrieb Lawrence Paulson:

Leaves something to be desired. Starting with the first sentence. Do we care?

Larry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabelle_(proof_assistant)


Wikipedia is vox pupuli, so it can be arbitrary non-sense -- experienced 
users of Wikipedia should know that. Nonetheless, I have occasionally 
updated the version number of the official Isabelle release there.


BTW, Wikipedia *content* should be discussed on the Wikipedia discussion 
page in question, in order to avoid bypassing the official structures of 
that project.



I am more concerned about this wiki here: 
https://isabelle.in.tum.de/community since it is provided by one of the 
established Isabelle sites.


I would still like to see a genuine Isabelle community contributing here, 
and doing serious maintenance.  Right now it is just a scribbling board 
for people who were discontent with some of the official READMEs or 
manuals, and even that is often pointless already due to continuous 
updates of the official versions.



Makarius
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Isabelle (proof assistant) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2013-02-19 Thread Lawrence Paulson
we'll need a volunteer.

The HOL Wikipedia page also describes Isabelle as the successor of HOL4. I 
don't think they see it this way.
:-)

Larry

On 19 Feb 2013, at 06:52, Tobias Nipkow nip...@in.tum.de wrote:

 It would be better to update it. The German version is also a bit odd...
 
 Tobias
 
 Am 19/02/2013 00:42, schrieb Lawrence Paulson:
 Leaves something to be desired. Starting with the first sentence. Do we care?
 
 Larry
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabelle_(proof_assistant) 
 
 ___
 isabelle-dev mailing list
 isabelle-...@in.tum.de
 https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
 
 ___
 isabelle-dev mailing list
 isabelle-...@in.tum.de
 https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev

___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev


Re: [isabelle-dev] Isabelle (proof assistant) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2013-02-18 Thread Tobias Nipkow
It would be better to update it. The German version is also a bit odd...

Tobias

Am 19/02/2013 00:42, schrieb Lawrence Paulson:
 Leaves something to be desired. Starting with the first sentence. Do we care?
 
 Larry
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabelle_(proof_assistant) 
 
 ___
 isabelle-dev mailing list
 isabelle-...@in.tum.de
 https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev
 
___
isabelle-dev mailing list
isabelle-...@in.tum.de
https://mailmanbroy.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/mailman/listinfo/isabelle-dev