Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-18 Thread Manuel Eberl
On 2017-07-05 22:09, Manuel Eberl wrote: > I still want to take care of two really tiny things: […] and the proper > printing > of "nat" values as numerals instead of successor notation. This is now done as of adf3155c57e2. I should note that I was somewhat imprecise, by ‘printing of "nat"

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-16 Thread Lawrence Paulson
I’ve been using it a bit and it’s pretty useful! Thanks Larry > On 9 Jul 2017, at 17:16, Fabian Immler wrote: > > A while ago, Florian Haftmann sent a command that does something like this to > the mailing list [1]. I attach a version that works with current > Isabelle2016-1

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-09 Thread Fabian Immler
A while ago, Florian Haftmann sent a command that does something like this to the mailing list [1]. I attach a version that works with current Isabelle2016-1 (not sure if I got all the modifications right, but it seems to work at least on the example in the .thy file). Fabian [1]

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-09 Thread Lars Hupel
I currently supervise a student who's investigating proof refactoring. One possible outcome of this would be a tool that also does what you suggested. It's a little too early to tell, though. Cheers Lars On 8 July 2017 23:28:42 CEST, Lawrence Paulson wrote: >No, that’s

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-08 Thread Lawrence Paulson
No, that’s precisely what I’d like to avoid. I prefer texts that you can actually read. It would be great to have something automatically generated, even if it needed manual tweaking (e.g. to rename variables). And I’ve gone to some effort purging instances of “guess” from existing proofs.

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-08 Thread Peter Lammich
We already have proof goal_cases. Is that what you mean?Peter Original Message Subject: Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017From: Lawrence Paulson To: Markus Wenzel CC: isabelle-dev I am always using the

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-08 Thread Lawrence Paulson
I am always using the new auto-complete facility for proof (cases “...”) and for induction. But could this be done for “proof" with any method, simply copying out the states of the subgoals? Then people would make a lot less use of “subgoals”, etc. Larry > On 5 Jul 2017, at 21:04,

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-06 Thread Blanchette, J.C.
Hi Makarius, > Is there anything else to take into account for this late-summer release > process? Simon Cruanes (cc:) and I are still working on Nunchaku, which we intend to become Nitpick's successor. I have some patches locally that move the current "Nunchaku.thy" to Main (it's not much

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-05 Thread Manuel Eberl
Nothing fancy, just a couple of code_post rules to rewrite successor notation into numeral notation after evaluation and before printing. I don't know if there's a better way to do that, but I think we discussed this on the mailing list a while ago and came to the conclusion that code_post is

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-05 Thread Lawrence Paulson
What’s the idea here? Larry > On 5 Jul 2017, at 21:09, Manuel Eberl wrote: > > the proper printing of "nat" values as numerals instead of successor notation. ___ isabelle-dev mailing list isabelle-...@in.tum.de

Re: [isabelle-dev] The coming release of Isabelle2017

2017-07-05 Thread Manuel Eberl
I still want to take care of two really tiny things: the "subseq" situation and the proper printing of "nat" values as numerals instead of successor notation. Just mentioning that for the sake of completeness. Manuel On 2017-07-05 21:04, Makarius wrote: > Dear all, > > we are now almost 7