[Isis-wg] 答复: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07

2017-12-22 Thread Xuxiaohu
Hi Jeff, As for per-link MSD information, I have the following comments: 1) I wonder whether you have considered the implementation differences on the label stack imposition process among different vendors. More specially, some chooses to impose the label stack on ingress line-cards while

Re: [Isis-wg] 答复: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07

2017-12-22 Thread Paul Mattes
Thank you. I know "MSD" is now taken to mean the label imposition limit, so we're stuck with it. I would be happy to comment on any incomplete/unhelpful terminology definitions I run across. pdm -Original Message- From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com] Sent:

Re: [Isis-wg] 答复: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd-07

2017-12-22 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Hi Paul, Thanks for your comments! I do see your point, at his point in time “MSD” is a common term in the industry and changing would create more confusion than good. IETF documents provide formal definition of the terms defined in it, so for all practical reasons, a person who’s unsure

Re: [Isis-wg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-14.txt

2017-12-22 Thread Stewart Bryant
Hi, There appears to be no explicit typing for the SID. Clearly it can be a MPLS label, an IPv6 address, but in the future it might be something else. How does a parser know the SID type? Thanks Stewart On 15/12/2017 18:30, Jeff Tantsura wrote: Les, Thanks for doing that, great!