Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07

Hi, the new version uploaded. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/ please review. thanks. - Naiming On Jan 24, 2018, at 2:56 PM, Naiming Shen (naiming) > wrote: Hi Chris, Thanks for the comments, please see replies

[Isis-wg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-09.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IS-IS for IP Internets WG of the IETF. Title : IS-IS Routing with Reverse Metric Authors : Naiming Shen Shane Amante

[Isis-wg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-isis-ipv6-dst-src-routing-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IS-IS for IP Internets WG of the IETF. Title : IPv6 Source/Destination Routing using IS-IS Authors : Fred Baker David

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

Alia – Looks fine to me – thanx. I like the fact that the charter now more clearly allows work which we have yet to anticipate. If the staunch IPv6 advocates don’t give you grief for overloading “IP” to mean “IP/IPv6” you won’t get any from me. ☺ Les From: Alia Atlas

Re: [Isis-wg] [OSPF] Link-State Routing WG charter

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 6:11 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > Wouldn’t L2 reference would be a bit outdated? > There has been work from IEEE and from TRILL in the past as well as other aspects (e.g. RFC 6165, RFC 6326, RFC 6329, RFC 7176) and - particularly with TRILL

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

Hi Les, Thanks for the suggestions! I've modified the paragraph about IS-IS to read: "IS-IS is an IGP specified and standardized by ISO through ISO 10589:2002 and additional RFC standards with extensions to support IP that has been deployed in the Internet for decades. For the IS-IS protocol,

Re: [Isis-wg] early proposed charter for the Link-State Routing WG

Hi Alia, +1 on keeping FRR work in RTGWG ;-) Cheers, Jeff From: rtgwg on behalf of Alia Atlas Date: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 at 09:22 To: , OSPF List Cc: RTGWG Subject: early proposed

Re: [Isis-wg] [OSPF] Link-State Routing WG charter

Wouldn’t L2 reference would be a bit outdated? Cheers, Jeff From: OSPF on behalf of "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 15:09 To: Stewart Bryant , "Acee Lindem (acee)" ,

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

It occurred to me after sending this that perhaps a better statement as regards IS-IS would be: “LSR’s work is focused on IP/IPv6 and Layer 2 routing…” though admittedly there isn’t much going on as regards Layer2 and IS-IS at the moment. Les From: Isis-wg

Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07

Hi Chris, Thanks for the comments, please see replies inline, > On Jan 24, 2018, at 3:32 AM, Christian Hopps wrote: > > > Here are my comments on -08. The most important one would be the M-ISIS > discrepancy. > > - 3.1 " If an IS-IS router is configured to originate a TE

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

Since a charter only provides a general definition of the work that falls within the purview of the WG it requires some adjunct to keep track of the current priorities. That could be the list of milestones (which OSPF has regularly maintained – but IS-IS has not) – or it could simply be the

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

Yes that fixes that. How about: s/The following topics are expected to be an initial focus:/ In addition to ongoing maintenance, the following topics are expected to be an initial focus:/ I am just concerned that we need not to loose focus on work in progress. - Stewart On 24/01/2018

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

How about: LSR will coordinate with CCAMP and BIER on their extensions to the LSR IGPs as applicable to LSV protocol operation and scale. Thanks, Acee From: Isis-wg on behalf of Alia Atlas Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 12:42 PM To: Stewart

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

Hi Stewart, Thanks for the quick feedback. Feel free to provide suggestions for text changes if you have them. You've certainly written enough charters :-) Regards, Alia On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > Alia, > I think that this merger is

[Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

Here is the proposed charter for the LSR working group that will be created from the SPF and ISIS working groups. This is scheduled for internal review for the IESG telechat on February 8. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lsr/ The Link-State Routing (LSR) Working Group is chartered

Re: [Isis-wg] WG adoption of draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing-06

Last I remember was that you had still some holes in the preference rules you wrote (as in, this thing may loop in this cornercase) but they were managable by now (i.e. the draft needs minor prunning on too much flexibility you gave things and then will work) but I'd need to swap my memory from

Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07

Here are my comments on -08. The most important one would be the M-ISIS discrepancy. - 3.1 " If an IS-IS router is configured to originate a TE Default Metric sub-TLV for a link, but receives a Reverse Metric TLV from its neighbor that does not contain a TE Default Metric sub-TLV,