Re: [Isis-wg] [OSPF] Link-State Routing WG charter

+2 we already have a kitchen-sink protocol to do so… Cheers, Jeff From: OSPF on behalf of "Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG/Singapore)" Date: Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 18:02 To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" , "Les Ginsberg

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

+1 to that From: Isis-wg on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Friday, January 26, 2018 at 3:18 AM To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" , Stewart Bryant , Alia Atlas Cc: OSPF List

Re: [Isis-wg] [OSPF] Link-State Routing WG charter

Of course the routing area has created another link state routing protocol in the recent past, OLSRv2 (RFC 7181) in the MANET WG (not listed for coordination). And if any work ever re-surfaces (beyond the existing three experimental RFCs) on adaption of OSPF for wireless networks (MANETs) then

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

Stewart - From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:32 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; Acee Lindem (acee) ; Alia Atlas Cc: OSPF List ; isis-wg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Isis-wg]

Re: [Isis-wg] [OSPF] Link-State Routing WG charter

Hi all, I agree with Stewart: it would be clearer to make explicit that all the protocol work we have been referring to as "Traffic Engineering"/"extended metrics"/"topological parameters"/etc. is still in scope of the LSR WG. By the way, I think is would be great to also mention the PCE WG when