Re: [Isis-wg] Latitude/Longitude Granularity in https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-shen-isis-geo-coordinates-03.txt

Hi Peter, Thanks for your detailed response. One thing we decided since my original query was to move the YANG geo-location type out of the ietf-routing-types.yang model since we thought that we didn’t have enough review and experience to model it correctly. We are going to put it in a separate

Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07

align it with the identifier for the advertising TLV. In the context of a reverse metric (the advertised TLV), it is not a metric offset even though it is added to the existing metric in the SPF computation. Thanks, Acee Les From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Acee L

[Isis-wg] ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm

Hi Shraddha, Peter, et al, The comment on the draft I had was that the conflict case where two ISIS routers advertise the same multi-homed prefix with a different algorithm needs to be covered. I wouldn’t try and optimize for this and would just do whatever is simplest but avoids loops (e.g.,

[Isis-wg] ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm (Resending with alias correction)

Hi Shraddha, Peter, et al, The comment on the draft I had was that the conflict case where two ISIS routers advertise the same multi-homed prefix with a different algorithm needs to be covered. I wouldn’t try and optimize for this and would just do whatever is simplest but avoids loops (e.g.,

Re: [Isis-wg] ISIS SR Flexible Algorithm (Resending with alias correction)

;resolution draft >Rather than putting different pieces in different drafts. > >Rgds >Shraddha > > > >-Original Message- >From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppse...@cisco.com] >Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 3:35 AM >To: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com>; >d

Re: [Isis-wg] IS-IS and OSPF Call for agenda slots @ IETF-100

Hi Chris, et al, The authors of "OSPF Graceful Restart Enhancements”, draft-basavaraj-ospf-graceful-restart-enhancements-00 would like a 10 minute slot at IETF 100. Thanks, Acee On 10/19/17, 9:55 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote: > >Hi OSPF and IS-IS, > >The preliminary

Re: [Isis-wg] Link-State Routing WG charter

How about: LSR will coordinate with CCAMP and BIER on their extensions to the LSR IGPs as applicable to LSV protocol operation and scale. Thanks, Acee From: Isis-wg on behalf of Alia Atlas Date: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 12:42 PM To: Stewart

Re: [Isis-wg] [Bier] WGLC: draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions-04

With respect to the text in section 5.2, I agree with Peter. Thanks Acee On 2/12/18, 9:59 AM, "BIER on behalf of Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" wrote: Hi Tony, OSPF does not have the original text, so it does not need the new one.

Re: [Isis-wg] [Bier] WGLC : draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions-07.txt

I agree. As a point of reference, we've only have defined two IGP algorithms so far and the segment routing draft dates back about 4 years. https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters/igp-parameters.xhtml#igp-algorithm-types Even with more artistic freedom afforded to multicast, I still

Re: [Isis-wg] [Bier] BAR field length in draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions and draft-ietf-bier-ospf-extensions

Hi Alia, I support Peter's position on the draft. While I believe at 8 bit space is more than enough to support variations of the BIER algorithm for the foreseeable future, I think reaching consensus is more critical than the precise encoding. Thanks, Acee On 2/20/18, 12:28 PM, "Isis-wg on