Bismillah [IslamCity] Please visit this article on www.MuslimsToday.com website !!

2007-10-15 Thread S A Hannan
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please visit this article on www.MuslimsToday.com website !!



Watching Global Islamic Relations for better understanding الموقع 
العربي

  Wednesday, 28 February 2007 09:14: AM


--

  A Secret History
  http://www.MuslimsToday.com/EN/Contents.aspx?AID=5385

  Carla Power



  For Muslims and non-Muslims alike, the stock image of an Islamic 
scholar is a gray-bearded man. Women tend to be seen as the subjects of Islamic 
law rather than its shapers. And while some opportunities for religious 
education do exist for women — the prestigious Al-Azhar University in Cairo has 
a women’s college, for example, and there are girls’ madrasas and female study 
groups in mosques and private homes — cultural barriers prevent most women in 
the Islamic world from pursuing such studies. Recent findings by a scholar at 
the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies in Britain, however, may help lower those 
barriers and challenge prevalent notions of women’s roles within Islamic 
society. Mohammad Akram Nadwi, a 43-year-old Sunni alim, or religious scholar, 
has rediscovered a long-lost tradition of Muslim women teaching the Koran, 
transmitting hadith (deeds and sayings of the Prophet Muhammad) and even making 
Islamic law as jurists.


  Akram embarked eight years ago on a single-volume biographical 
dictionary of female hadith scholars, a project that took him trawling through 
biographical dictionaries, classical texts, madrasa chronicles and letters for 
relevant citations. “I thought I’d find maybe 20 or 30 women,” he says. To 
date, he has found 8,000 of them, dating back 1,400 years, and his dictionary 
now fills 40 volumes. It’s so long that his usual publishers, in Damascus and 
Beirut, have balked at the project, though an English translation of his 
preface — itself almost 400 pages long — will come out in England this summer. 
(Akram has talked with Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Arabia’s former ambassador 
to the United States, about the possibility of publishing the entire work 
through his Riyadh-based foundation.)


  The dictionary’s diverse entries include a 10th-century 
Baghdad-born jurist who traveled through Syria and Egypt, teaching other women; 
a female scholar — or muhaddithat — in 12th-century Egypt whose male students 
marveled at her mastery of a “camel load” of texts; and a 15th-century woman 
who taught hadith at the Prophet’s grave in Medina, one of the most important 
spots in Islam. One seventh-century Medina woman who reached the academic rank 
of jurist issued key fatwas on hajj rituals and commerce; another female jurist 
living in medieval Aleppo not only issued fatwas but also advised her far more 
famous husband on how to issue his.


  Not all of these women scholars were previously unknown. Many 
Muslims acknowledge that Islam has its learned women, particularly in the field 
of hadith, starting with the Prophet’s wife Aisha. And several Western 
academics have written on women’s religious education. About a century ago, the 
Hungarian Orientalist Ignaz Goldziher estimated that about 15 percent of 
medieval hadith scholars were women. But Akram’s dictionary is groundbreaking 
in its scope.


  Indeed, read today, when many Muslim women still don’t dare pray 
in mosques, let alone lecture leaders in them, Akram’s entry for someone like 
Umm al-Darda, a prominent jurist in seventh-century Damascus, is startling. As 
a young woman, al-Darda used to sit with male scholars in the mosque, talking 
shop. “I’ve tried to worship Allah in every way,” she wrote, “but I’ve never 
found a better one than sitting around, debating other scholars.” She went on 
to teach hadith and fiqh, or law, at the mosque, and even lectured in the men’s 
section; her students included the caliph of Damascus. She shocked her 
contemporaries by praying shoulder to shoulder with men — a nearly unknown 
practice, even now — and issuing a fatwa, still cited by modern scholars, that 
allowed women to pray in the same position as men.


  It’s after the 16th century that citations of women scholars 
dwindle. Some historians venture that this is because Islamic education grew 
more formal, excluding women as it became increasingly oriented toward 
establishing careers in the courts and mosques. (Strangely enough, Akram found 
that this kind of exclusion also helped women become better scholars. Because 
they didn’t hold official posts, they had little reason to invent or embellish 
prophetic traditions.)


  Akram’s work has led to accusations that he is championing free 
mixing between men and women, but he says that is not so. He maintains that 
women students should sit at a discreet distance from their male classmates or 
co-worshipers, or be separated 

[IslamCity] Please visit this article on www.MuslimsToday.com website !!

2006-04-16 Thread S A Hannan






- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: 

  
  


  
  
   Watching 
  Global Islamic Relations for better understanding
الموقع العربي  
  
  


  
  

  


  
 Wednesday, 12 April 2006 19:02: PM 


  

  Islamophobia: 
  Meaning, Manifestations, Causeshttp://www.MuslimsToday.com/EN/Contents.aspx?AID=4269
  Mustafa Abu Sway 
  
  
  A discussion and condemnation of Islamophobia. 
  
  
  “Muslims could change their world and overcome the tyranny 
  of Islamophobia and anti-Muslim discrimination, just as slavery 
  was abolished”1 
  
  Islamophobia consists of violence against Muslims in the form 
  of physical assaults, verbal abuse, and the vandalizing of 
  property, especially of Islamic institutions including mosques, 
  Islamic schools and Muslim cemeteries. Islamophobia also includes 
  discrimination in employment — where Muslims are faced with 
  unequal opportunities —discrimination in the provision of health 
  services, exclusion from managerial positions and jobs of high 
  responsibility; and exclusion from political and governmental 
  posts. Ultimately, Islamophobia also comprises prejudice in the 
  media, literature, and everyday conversation.2 
  Let us consider the following examples: 
  
* A mosque in the French city of Carpentras in the 
Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region came under Molotov cocktail 
attack on Friday, November 11, [2005] during the weekly Friday 
prayer.3 
* Twelve drawings depicting Prophet Muhammad in different 
settings appeared in Denmark’s largest circulation daily 
Jyllands-Posten on September 30, [2005]. In one of the drawings, 
Prophet Muhammad appeared with a turban shaped like a bomb 
strapped to his head. 
* Police arrested two people, apparently a Jewish pimp and a 
prostitute, on the Friday night of August 26 [2005] on suspicion 
that they were responsible for a pig’s head dressed in a 
keffiyeh and inscribed with the nickname “the Prophet Muhammad” 
being thrown into the yard of Tel Aviv’s Hassan Beik Mosque.4 
* The U.S. military detailed on Friday, June 3, 2005, five 
cases in which jailers at the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, 
Cuba, had desecrated copies of the Holy Qur’an, including one 
incident that had occurred as recently as March. Brigadier 
General Jay Hood, commander of the Guantanamo prison who headed 
the inquiry, said the inquiry had confirmed five cases of 
desecration. 
* “Did you hear about the Muslim virgin desperate to lose it? 
It wasn’t really the sex she was interested in; she just didn’t 
want to [f**k] a suicide bomber when she died.” The British 
journalist Julie Burchill’s “favorite joke of the moment,” in 
“What Allah Wants, Allah Gets” as reprinted in the Israeli 
daily, Haaretz (September 24, 2005) 
  
  Who Are the Islamophobes? 
  
  The countries where these offensive and troubling Islamophobic 
  examples took place are France, Denmark, Israel, and the U.S. 
  Other examples in the article include Germany, Sri Lanka and the 
  UK. The list fails to reflect the fact that Islamophobic incidents 
  exist in every country where there is a Muslim minority. 
  Islamophobia-Watch.com has documented Islamophobic entries under 
  the name of these additional countries: Australia, Austria, 
  Belgium, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. 
  In addition, the perpetrators could be categorized as either 
  individual civilians or officials, including military. There is a 
  problem about determining the Islamophobe in the last example 
  given above; is it only the author, Julie Burchill? How far could 
  Haaretz itself be held responsible for the Islamophobic content? 
  (The original responsibility, in this case, does not pertain to 
  Haaretz but to Burchill herself and The Times. In both dailies, 
  however, the piece was printed verbatim, without asterisks to 
  replace the “f” word. The comments on the article were no less 
  Islamophobic. The