"The Ahmedabad district administration, instead of issuing compensation cheques 
to the victims, issued as many as 21 cheques worth Rs. 20 lakh to one 
Prabhashankar Pandit, an accused involved in the loot and killing of Muslims in 
this locality. Pandit is out on bail"
Only in Gujarat: cheques for riot victims go to riot accused; probe ordered

Submitted by mumtaz on 2 June 2009 - 8:24pm.
http://www.twocircles.net/2009jun02/only_gujarat_cheques_riot_victims_go_riot_accused_probe_ordered.html

By TwoCircles.net Staff Correspondent
Ahmedabad: A scam in the distribution of compensation to the riot victims of 
2002 in the worst hit Naroda Patia has come to light. A senior official of the 
Ahmedabad district administration P R Patel has been asked to look into the 
scam.
The Ahmedabad district administration, instead of issuing compensation cheques 
to the victims, issued as many as 21 cheques worth Rs. 20 lakh to one 
Prabhashankar Pandit, an accused involved in the loot and killing of Muslims in 
this locality. Pandit is out on bail.
Prabhashankar claimed over Rs. 15 lakh as compensation from the state 
government. The latest cheques issued in his name are from the union 
government’s compensation package announced for the Gujarat riot victims of 
2002 on the pattern of Sikh victims of 1984.
The Muslim dominated Naroda Patia, on the outskirts of Ahmedabad city, had 
several clusters with Muslim population. One of the clusters was known as 
Pandit-ni-Chali where 28 Muslim families lived.
When the riots broke out, Muslims left the place to save their lives, leaving 
behind their home and hearth. Their houses were looted and damaged by the 
miscreants. When they were still taking shelter in Shah Alam Dargah and were 
not able to return due to security reasons, the administration began survey of 
the damaged property.
In connivance with the local talati (land revenue official) and the government 
surveyor, Prabhashankar’s father Shivshankar Pandit forged the documents 
showing that he was the owner of all the 28 houses in Pandit-ni-Chali.
This helped Shivshankar to get compensation from the state government amounting 
to Rs. 15 lakh approximately. According to locals, the Pandit-ni-Chali houses 
were constructed on a piece of land belonging to Dhanush Dhari Mata Trust with 
Hukumsih Bhagwansinh as its trustee. However, Shivshankar was mentioned as a 
caretaker in the records.
“But after the death of Hukumsinh, Shivshankar declared himself as owner of the 
land’’, says Nazir Pathan, a riot victim and a school teacher. According to 
him, the ownership of the land should either go to the government or to the 
Muslim occupying the houses and not to the Shivshankar. However, the state 
government officials did not give any attention to these things and paid 
compensation to Shivshankar after the riots though Shivshankar was not the 
victims.
When the security situation improved, Muslims returned and occupied their 
houses after repairing them. But no one could question Shivshankar about the 
compensation he illegally claimed for their houses because of an undercurrent 
of communal tension. Meanwhile Shivshankar died.
However, the Muslim victims raised their voice when the Ahmedabad district 
administration handed over as many as 21 cheques of compensation to 
Shivshanker’s son Prabhashankar after the Gujarat High Court issued an order to 
expedite the compensation payment to the riot victims recently.
The victims are now demanding that the administration must take the cheques 
back from Prabhashankar.
On June 1, victims led by Jan Sangharsh Manch (JSM) representative Shamshad 
Pathan complained to the district officials. City Mamlatdar Mamta Sojitra, 
in-charge of compensation distribution in Ahmedabad city, told Pathan and 
victims that the compensation was given to Prabhashankar because the talati and 
surveyor report mentioned Prabhashankar’s father as owner of the houses.
However, district collector Hareet Shukla has asked additional collector P R 
Patel to inquire into the matter.
Pathan said that his organization would move the court in case justice was not 
done by the district officials.



With Regards

Abi
 

"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."
- Voltaire"


      

Reply via email to