A System that has  Crumbled
 It was the  practice of the Prophet to accept bay‘ah (pledge of obedience) 
from his  Companions at the time they entered into Islam. In addition, he 
sought their  pledge on other special occasions, (or, occasionally, without any 
occasion).  Such bay‘ah was approved by Allah who mentioned one of the pledges 
in a Qur’anic  passage. Such bay‘ah was also necessary because Islamic call was 
new, and the  meaning of the Kalimah Shahadah was not apparent to the 
pre-Islamic Arabs. On  the occasion of the bay‘ah, the Prophet explained to 
them what entry into Islam  meant in theoretical and practical terms, and that, 
pronouncement of the Kalimah  was pronouncement of one’s willingness to 
henceforth obey Allah and His  Messenger.
History tells us that there had been bay‘ah before the advent of  Islam, and 
hadith literature informs us that there will be a bay‘ah at the  advent of the 
Mahdi as another (perhaps the final) at Bayt al-Maqdis, probably  during the 
time of the closing events.
Subsequent to the Prophet, bay‘ah of  obedience to Allah and His Messenger was 
not considered necessary because of the  spread of knowledge and the general 
understanding that without willingness to  obey Allah and His Messenger, there 
could be no Islam. People freshly entering  into Islam, therefore, at the time 
of the Companions and their followers, were  not asked to execute a pledge to 
this effect since they knew the demands of the  testimony of Islam: it was 
shelving of one’s older way of life in favor of the  new one they were 
embracing. Islam was submission to Allah, no more and no less.  Everyone lived 
by Islamic ordinances, the society was modeled on the Islamic  pattern, the 
economy ran on Islamic principles, the state was guided by Islamic  
injunctions, and there was no question of obedience to any other, than Allah 
and  His Messenger.
Although out of use for a while in the strict religious sense,  bay‘ah acquired 
a political character after the Prophet. Since there could be  more than one 
claimant to Muslim leadership, meaning, political authority, it  became 
necessary to seek the pledge of obedience from the citizens for only one  
nominate or claimant; and hence, he who refused to take a pledge, was thought 
to  be refusing to be in the mainstream, parting his ways with the Jama‘ah. The 
 first bay‘ah of this nature was instituted by ‘Umar ibn al-Khattab, who 
pledged  his own hand to the first Khaleefah, Abu Bakr. It is in this political 
sense  that the Prophet is reported to have said that he who died without 
having  entered into a pledge, died a Jaahiliyy death. It was political bay‘ah 
that he  meant, that is, bay‘ah at the hands of a Khaleefah or Ameer, to obey 
him in  political matters (and not personal), so long as he did not command a 
wrong. A  bay‘ah covering obedience to Allah and His Messenger
 was uncalled for because  any other alternative was simply out of the question.
With weaknesses  creeping in, however, after a few centuries there began to 
appear Muslims who  failed to lead a purely Islamic life, or who did not, for a 
variety of reasons,  possess enough knowledge to be able to lead their lives in 
a manner desired by  Islam. Nonetheless, at a point in their lives they 
retreated from their life of  disobedience, hoping to, thereonward, lead the 
life of total devotion to Allah.  Yet, many had no idea what they were to do by 
way of reformation, repentance,  penance and atonement for what they had 
neglected so far. There were others who  were aware of their own moral 
shortcomings, conscious of the need to purify  themselves, but did not know how 
to go about doing it, or control their base  instincts before getting into a 
worse situation. 
Naturally, they sought a  person who was knowledgeable and devoted to Allah who 
could help. There were of  course many who could, and the system of bay‘ah with 
a religious character  reappeared. But, since Shuyukh had no ecclesiastical 
power, bay‘ah at their  hands remained, primarily, the expression of a mere 
wish. It did not, and could  not acquire the characteristics of a religious 
obligation.
The dubious nature  had its implications. Experience taught the Shuyukh that 
mere admonition on  their part, and pious intentions on the part of their 
followers, were not the  cure for the anomalies. Those who came to them for 
help did not always live by  what they were taught. And yet, their own names 
could be dragged into the  misdeeds of their followers. It could be said, “So 
and so is of such poor  character, although he attends the assembly of such and 
such a Sheikh!”
The  Shuyukh therefore developed a whole plan of action and techniques of 
reformation  complete with a kind of curriculum for those who would pledge 
their hands to  them promising to obey Allah and His Messenger. They also added 
obedience to  themselves as a necessary ingredient of the bay‘ah and the right 
to inquire and  told what happened at the personal and private level, so as to 
discover the  impediments to reformation. In other words, the inclusion of this 
last clause  helped them inquire, get the information, scrutinize, analyze, 
discover  weaknesses, and suggest the cures. They even began to guide them in 
their family  affairs – by extending their influence to that sector - to help 
their followers  out of social and sometimes even economic difficulties, in 
order to free them  for training and observation of religious obligations. 
Through the curriculum  they drew, they guided them from time to time, stage to 
stage, leading them –  through education and application -
 to higher moral and spiritual states. Not  surprisingly, before accepting a 
novice, some of the Shuyukh would not merely  inquire about what kind of books 
the novices had read earlier, but also, whether  they knew horse riding, 
warfare techniques and so on. So that, when the occasion  for Jihad arose, 
these novices (murids), inspired by the Shuyukh participated in  thousands. 
Thus, with the passage of time, the Shuyukh became spiritual  guides for the 
individuals and their families, sort of adopting the family, and  guiding them 
all, not necessarily in devotional matters alone, but in all  affairs of life 
with the spiritual ends in view. So that, affairs such as what  profession to 
choose, whom to appoint as teachers of the children, and with whom  to make 
marriage alliances, were all decided on the advice of the Shuyukh. In  other 
words, the family had a moral and spiritual head in addition to the  temporal 
head.
This was successful so long as there were sincere Shuyukh and  sincere 
followers of Islam. But, with insincerity towards Allah and His  Revelation 
settling into the hearts, the system began to crumble and ultimately  became 
corrupt. The idea became prevalent that if you were attached to a Sheikh,  he 
would look after your affairs of the Hereafter, guiding you through to  
Paradise through his influence and intercession. Another, and no less serious  
corruption was that you get connected to an important Sheikh of the past,  
through allegiance to the present-day nominated representative (Khaleefah) in  
order to gain greater material benefits in this world, and climb to higher  
spiritual status in the Hereafter. It became necessary to profess this because  
the murids of today could clearly see that their present-day Sheikh (peer) was  
fatally below the moral and spiritual norms required of a man of this position, 
 pretty poor in application of Islamic rules of life to himself
 and family, was  in fact a gatherer of wealth, fattening himself upon the hard 
earned money of  his followers, and thus, plainly incapable of winning 
salvation for himself, far  from being in a position to help his followers. 
But, if he was below the mark,  then, the implied suggestion was, the Shaykh 
al-Shuyukh (the chief of the  Shuyukh, or the grand-master), dead by a few 
centuries, to whom the murids were  connected through the present day Sheikh, 
is the all-powerful who is capable of  getting your material needs granted by 
Allah. Thus, arose the need to include  the tombs, where the Shaykh al-Shuyukh 
resided, yet the need to have a  contemporary Sheikh, as a means, despite his 
questionable qualifications and  suspicious activities.
But of course, the connecting line could not be  stopped at the Shaykh 
al-Shuyukh of the 5th, 6th or 7th centuries. The murids  demanded higher 
climbs, and hence, the chain had to be taken to the Prophet  himself – peace be 
upon him. 
How relevant is the system today and how  reliable the peers? (Many of them are 
honest enough to refer to themselves not  as Sheikhs, but as peers: 
acknowledging a lower position for themselves). We  might answer in short that 
where the Sheikh is truly a Sheikh (nobody seems to  have seen one recently), 
the system is still valid. To make room for an honest  one, we might say that 
if a Shaykh of today accepts the pledge at his hand, of  obedience to Allah and 
His Messenger, and then guides his murids on, by teaching  them the Qur’an and 
Sunnah, or the Arabic language, or, putting them on to a  course of study of 
the core texts, or monitor their 24-hour activities, then, a  Muslim might 
enter into his bay‘ah. But, if he adds anything else to his plan of  action, 
such as, suggest adhkaar, or claim spiritual guidance, or suggest  elevating 
his followers to higher spiritual stations through his own spiritual  power, or 
connect him to a Sheikh of the past, or to the Prophet
 himself, or  chase away the devil on him, or conduct halaqas of dhikr, or 
claim to prevent  misfortunes falling onto his murids, or help them get 
children, or solve their  economic problems through rosary and wazaa’if, or is 
primarily a dispenser of  ta‘weez (amulets) of various functions, or worse, 
promises connections with a  dead Sheikh, or worst of all, declares 
participation in tomb affairs,  celebrations, and functions as necessary for 
spiritual progress, then, he may be  advised by the would be murids to earn his 
living through other honest  means.

 
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.

Reply via email to