From Protest To Engagement 
   
            A few good words go a long way

  By NAZIM BAKSH 
  
 
  On a cold, windy Saturday afternoon in late February, I joined hundreds of 
mostly young British Muslims as they crowded into Westminster Hall in central 
London to listen to an impressive line-up of Muslim scholars. The program was 
sponsored by the Radical Middle Way (RMW), an independent grass-roots 
initiative that receives limited funding from the British government. 
  
In the year since it was launched, RMW has organized a variety of public forums 
across the UK. Often dubbed “The Scholars Road Show,” these forums have 
featured speakers such as Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah, Al Habib Ali Al-Jifri and 
Shaykh Hamza Yusuf. With eye-grabbing titles such as “Between Ignorance and 
Extremism” and “Is Islam in Need of a Reformation?”, the organizers have had no 
difficulty filling venues. RMW’s message has reached an estimated 60,000 
British Muslims.  
  The London program was titled “From Protest to Engagement,” and as the 
evening progressed, a consensus started to emerge among the speakers. 
Engagement, or more specifically, “‘faith-based civic engagement,” is the most 
sensible response to the challenges Muslims are currently experiencing in the 
West. It also conforms to the character of the Blessed Messenger, Muhammad, 
upon him be peace and blessings. 
  
As I listened to Shaykh Abdallah Bin Bayyah’s talk, I came to the realization 
that in his own inimitable style, he had put his thumb on the fault-line of 
Muslim reality in the West. Caught in the schizophrenic tug-of-war between 
nationalist identity and loyalty to the Ummah, Muslims have unfortunately 
embraced a logic of the left and adopted protest as a counter-hegemonic 
political strategy. 

Over the years, protest has invariably resulted in the entrenchment of a now 
dominant paradigm among Muslims of an “us (Muslims) versus them (kafirs).” 
Protest arises from a false assumption that “the dominant system” will 
eventually collapse in the ashes of its own inherent logic. From this 
perspective, protest is the alternative movement’s best strategy to speed up 
its demise.  
  Protest breeds resentment and when infused with religious zeal, it often 
leads to sectarianism, and in many cases, violence in the name of faith. In the 
cauldron of protest politics, religious extremism has found fertile ground to 
germinate.  
  Making a shift from a discourse mired in the politics of protest to an action 
plan grounded in social engagement, I realized, was going to require more than 
a sound niyah (intention). The seismic shift from protest to engagement will 
require all stakeholders among Muslim communities in the West to set aside 
their titles and ideological platforms and embody an ethic based on the values 
we hold in common as human beings.  
  
That was the message of Shaykh Abdallah bin Bayyah. He elucidated the efficacy 
of engagement over protest by citing a narration attributed to the Messenger of 
God, upon him be peace and blessings. The Prophet compared two kinds of 
passengers on a ship—the people on the upper deck and the people lodged in its 
hull. As the ship sets out, those in the hull decide to drill a hole in the 
boat to gain access to badly needed water. Witnessing this, those on the deck 
must decide whether they should shout slogans and organize a demonstration with 
banners that scream for attention, or engage the drillers in a meaningful 
dialogue in order to save the ship from sinking and causing the death of all on 
board.   
  “When you have a fire to put out,” Shaykh Abdallah said, “you are not 
concerned about who is standing with you to put it out.” 
  
“Muslims in the UK,” he continued, “need a group of firefighters to pick up a 
bucket and come to the rescue of societies that are burning.” 
  
The first indication that some segments of the British Muslim community are 
struggling with this message, if not rejecting it outright, came at the very 
end of the program when Shaykh Hamza Yusuf, executive director of Zaytuna 
Institute in Hayward, Calif., delivered the closing remarks of the evening. 
  
He forthrightly dismissed any accusation leveled at RMW that because it 
receives government funding, it means that the opinions of the scholars who 
speak on its platform must be government propaganda. 
  
  ‘‘Who do you think this government is?’’ Shaykh Hamza asked. ‘‘They are 
called civil servants. Who do you think pays them? It is from the pockets of 
the people. 
  There are nearly 2 million Muslims paying taxes in this country, don’t they 
deserve a little refund?” Loud applause. 
  
“This is not Rawalpindi, Cairo or Karachi, where if you criticize the 
government, you suddenly disappear. In this country you are not only subjects 
of the Queen, but you are citizens as well.” Loud and approving applause again. 
  Clearly, the protestors were not present in Westminster Hall.
  
  NAZIM BAKSH is a Canadian Journalism Fellow at Massey College, University of 
Toronto. He is a television and radio producer with the Canadian Broadcasting 
Corporation. 

    
  Copyright 2007 Islamica Magazine. 
All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium is 
prohibited.
  Site maintained by:ASiteOvernite.com 
                    
      
         



  
          _uacct = "UA-320819-3";  urchinTracker();    


       
      


   


          _uacct = "UA-320819-3";  urchinTracker();    

saiyed shahbazi
  www.shahbazcenter.org

Reply via email to