http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_23895.shtml
   
  Why is the US press silent on BrzezinskiÂ’s warnings of war against Iran?
  
By Barry Grey in Washington DC
Feb 3, 2007, 04:52


   

  The major national newspapers and most broadcast outlets failed even to 
report ThursdayÂ’s stunning testimony by former national security adviser 
Zbigniew Brzezinski before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
   
  Brzezinski, national security adviser to President Jimmy Carter, is among the 
most prominent figures within the US foreign policy establishment. He delivered 
a scathing critique of the war in Iraq and warned that the policy of the Bush 
administration was leading inevitably to a military confrontation with Iran 
which would have disastrous consequences for US imperialism.
   
  Most significant and disturbing was BrzezinskiÂ’s suggestion that the Bush 
administration might manufacture a pretext to justify a military attack on 
Iran. Presenting what he called a “plausible scenario for a military collision 
with Iraq,” Brzezinski laid out the following series of events: “Iraqi failure 
to meet the benchmarks, followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for 
the failure, then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the US 
blamed on Iran, culminating in, quote/unquote, ‘defensive’ US military action 
against Iran...” [Emphasis added].
   
  Thus Brzezinski opined that a US military attack on Iran would be an 
aggressive action, presented as though it were a defensive response to alleged 
Iranian provocations, and came close to suggesting, without explicitly stating 
as much, that the White House was capable of manufacturing or allowing a 
terrorist attack within the US to provide a casus belli for war.
   
  It is self-evident that such testimony at an open congressional hearing from 
someone with decades of experience in the US foreign policy establishment and 
the closest ties to the military and intelligence apparatus is not only 
newsworthy, but of the most immense and grave import. Any objective and 
conscientious newspaper or news channel would consider it an obligation to 
inform the public of such a development.
   
  Yet neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post carried so much as a 
news brief on BrzezinskiÂ’s testimony in their Friday editions. Nor did USA 
Today or the Wall Street Journal. All of these publications, of course, have 
well-staffed Washington bureaus and regularly cover congressional 
hearings—especially those dealing with such burning political questions as the 
war in Iraq.
   
  There is no innocent explanation for their decision to suppress this story. 
  The Washington Post on Thursday published a large page-two column and photo 
on Henry KissingerÂ’s appearance the previous day before the same Senate 
committee. The former secretary of state under Richard Nixon gave testimony 
that was generally supportive of the Bush administrationÂ’s war policy.
   
  Moreover, the PostÂ’s web edition carried an Associated Press report on 
BrzezinskiÂ’s appearance. That article introduced subtle but significant changes 
to BrzezinskiÂ’s speculative scenario of the road to war with Iran which had the 
effect of underplaying the sharpness and urgency of BrzezinskiÂ’s critique of 
the Bush administration. It omitted the suggestion that a terrorist attack 
within the US could become the justification for war, and it removed the 
quotation marks from Brzezinski’s talk of a “defensive” war against Iran.
   
  The World Socialist Web Site on Friday telephoned the New York Times, the 
Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and USA Today to ask for an 
explanation for their failure to report BrzezinskiÂ’s testimony. None of the 
newspapers returned our calls.
   
  As for the television news outlets, the “News Hour with Jim Lehrer” on PBS 
showed a clip of Brzezinski laying out his war scenario before the Senate 
committee, without making any comment. “NBC Nightly News” ignored the story 
entirely.
   
  The suppression of this damning critique of the Iraq war, the conspiratorial 
methods of the Bush administration, and its drive to an even wider war in the 
Middle East is one more demonstration of the corrupt and reactionary character 
of the American mass media. It indicates that the establishment media is 
preparing once again, as in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq, to serve as a 
sounding board for the administrationÂ’s war propaganda and lies.
   
  http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/feb2007/brze-f03.shtml
  
 


"Strive as in a race to achieve the
 goal of excellence in all that you do."
   
  For real insights visit:
   
  http://www.geocities.com/mewatch99/
   
  Regards,
Nashid

Reply via email to