[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-6986) Queues/Topics with no pending messages are lost when using JDBCPersistenceAdapter

2020-04-03 Thread Ryan (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17074808#comment-17074808 ] Ryan commented on AMQ-6986: --- Blocking our ability to implement HA with SQL Server > Queues/Topics with no

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-6986) Queues/Topics with no pending messages are lost when using JDBCPersistenceAdapter

2020-04-03 Thread Ryan (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17074807#comment-17074807 ] Ryan commented on AMQ-6986: --- I have the same issue with AMQ-7462.  My issue is that the behaviour is different

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-6986) Queues/Topics with no pending messages are lost when using JDBCPersistenceAdapter

2018-06-14 Thread Davide Del Grande (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16512716#comment-16512716 ] Davide Del Grande commented on AMQ-6986: Gary, the fact that "because the jdbc store does not have

[jira] [Commented] (AMQ-6986) Queues/Topics with no pending messages are lost when using JDBCPersistenceAdapter

2018-06-14 Thread Gary Tully (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-6986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16512176#comment-16512176 ] Gary Tully commented on AMQ-6986: - it is by design because the jdbc store does not have an index.   the