[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16699012#comment-16699012
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-2026:
-
+1. [~kszucs] do you want to give this a shot? You'd need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16698634#comment-16698634
]
Uwe L. Korn commented on ARROW-2026:
We should coerce all timestamps to nanoseconds when this option
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16698283#comment-16698283
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-2026:
-
I agree that probably the correct fix here is to coerce all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16698229#comment-16698229
]
Krisztian Szucs commented on ARROW-2026:
What's the expectation here? So currently only NANO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16695014#comment-16695014
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-2026:
-
[~kszucs] can you have a look at this?
> [Python] µs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16616320#comment-16616320
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-2026:
-
Patches welcome
> [Python] µs timestamps saved as int64 even
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394790#comment-16394790
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-2026:
-
Moving to 0.10.0
> [Python] µs timestamps saved as int64 even
