[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17064894#comment-17064894
]
Joris Van den Bossche commented on ARROW-8039:
--
I expanded my existing PR for {{read_table}}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17056510#comment-17056510
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-8039:
-
If it were possible to maintain backward compatibility for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17056496#comment-17056496
]
Joris Van den Bossche commented on ARROW-8039:
--
> So the idea would be that read_table would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17056487#comment-17056487
]
Neal Richardson commented on ARROW-8039:
Ah, good call. That sounds reasonable to me (as someone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17056479#comment-17056479
]
Joris Van den Bossche commented on ARROW-8039:
--
So a more specific comment here: if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17056289#comment-17056289
]
Neal Richardson commented on ARROW-8039:
Right, my thought was that we'd solve the Dask problem a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17056284#comment-17056284
]
Joris Van den Bossche commented on ARROW-8039:
--
> We might focus this by saying that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17055470#comment-17055470
]
Neal Richardson commented on ARROW-8039:
We might focus this by saying that the objective is to
