[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923778#comment-16923778
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
After reverting the jemalloc version, the benchmarks show that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923639#comment-16923639
]
Antoine Pitrou commented on ARROW-6417:
---
FTR, similar issues with jemalloc seem to have happened in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923630#comment-16923630
]
Antoine Pitrou commented on ARROW-6417:
---
Wow that's massive.
Re {{SafeLoadAs}}, I'm with Micah: it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923612#comment-16923612
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
I opened an issue with jemalloc to see if we're doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923607#comment-16923607
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
The benchmark results in arrow-builder-benchmark are pretty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923566#comment-16923566
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
OK, it appears that the jemalloc version is causing the perf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923534#comment-16923534
]
Micah Kornfield commented on ARROW-6417:
For SafeLoadAs, you could try changing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923474#comment-16923474
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
I will try that next. I'm going to merge my current patch in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16923360#comment-16923360
]
Antoine Pitrou commented on ARROW-6417:
---
Have you tried to measure the same jemalloc version for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16922791#comment-16922791
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
Further down the rabbit hole
0.12.1 perf profile
{code}
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16922758#comment-16922758
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
So on closer inspection, in v0.11.1 we weren't yet handling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16921168#comment-16921168
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
OK, I think to make things faster we need to be more careful
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16921164#comment-16921164
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
The dreaded {{\_\_memmove_avx_unaligned_erms}} has showed up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16921131#comment-16921131
]
Wes McKinney commented on ARROW-6417:
-
I updated the results plot to use gcc 8.3 in both v0.11.1 and
14 matches
Mail list logo