[jira] [Resolved] (AURORA-1669) Kill twitter/commons ZK libs when Curator replacements are vetted

2017-10-23 Thread Stephan Erb (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stephan Erb resolved AURORA-1669.
-
Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: Bill Farner  (was: John Sirois)

> Kill twitter/commons ZK libs when Curator replacements are vetted
> -
>
> Key: AURORA-1669
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1669
> Project: Aurora
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: John Sirois
>Assignee: Bill Farner
>
> Once we have reports from production users that the Curator zk plumbing 
> introduced in AURORA-1468 is working well, the {{-zk_use_curator}} flag 
> should be deprecated and then the flag and commons code killed.  If the 
> vetting happens before the next release ({{0.14.0}}), we can dispense with a 
> deprecation cycle.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (AURORA-1669) Kill twitter/commons ZK libs when Curator replacements are vetted

2017-10-23 Thread Stephan Erb (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16215965#comment-16215965
 ] 

Stephan Erb commented on AURORA-1669:
-

https://reviews.apache.org/r/62652/ has landed

> Kill twitter/commons ZK libs when Curator replacements are vetted
> -
>
> Key: AURORA-1669
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1669
> Project: Aurora
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: John Sirois
>Assignee: John Sirois
>
> Once we have reports from production users that the Curator zk plumbing 
> introduced in AURORA-1468 is working well, the {{-zk_use_curator}} flag 
> should be deprecated and then the flag and commons code killed.  If the 
> vetting happens before the next release ({{0.14.0}}), we can dispense with a 
> deprecation cycle.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (AURORA-1895) Expose stats on ZooKeeperClient connection state

2017-10-23 Thread Stephan Erb (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16215956#comment-16215956
 ] 

Stephan Erb commented on AURORA-1895:
-

https://reviews.apache.org/r/62652/ has landed, dropping legacy ZK

> Expose stats on ZooKeeperClient connection state
> 
>
> Key: AURORA-1895
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1895
> Project: Aurora
>  Issue Type: Story
>  Components: Scheduler
>Reporter: Mehrdad Nurolahzade
>Assignee: Mehrdad Nurolahzade
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: newbie
>
> Expose stats on the connection state of the {{ZooKeeperClient}} in 
> {{CommonsServiceDiscoveryModule}}. This can be through the ZooKeeper client 
> [Watcher|https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.4.8/api/org/apache/zookeeper/Watcher.html]
>  interface.
> [AURORA-1838] exposed ZooKeeper stats for {{CuratorServiceDiscoveryModule}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Resolved] (AURORA-319) Allow job environments other than prod, devel, test or staging

2017-10-23 Thread Stephan Erb (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stephan Erb resolved AURORA-319.

Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: (was: Benjamin Staffin)

> Allow job environments other than prod, devel, test or staging
> --
>
> Key: AURORA-319
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-319
> Project: Aurora
>  Issue Type: Story
>  Components: Client
>Reporter: Jay Buffington
>Priority: Minor
>
> git commit bcabfce6 introduced limitations on what job environments must be 
> named.  Are these names arbitrary or is there some policy attached to these 
> names?  
> I suspect they are not arbitrary because I believe aurora will preempt tasks 
> that are not in the prod environment to make room for jobs that are.
> What would the ramifications be of removing the "_validate_environment_name" 
> function from src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/config.py ?  Are there 
> reasons why this was introduced in the first place?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (AURORA-319) Allow job environments other than prod, devel, test or staging

2017-10-23 Thread Stephan Erb (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16215853#comment-16215853
 ] 

Stephan Erb commented on AURORA-319:


This has now been submitted https://reviews.apache.org/r/62692/

Thanks for the contribution!

> Allow job environments other than prod, devel, test or staging
> --
>
> Key: AURORA-319
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-319
> Project: Aurora
>  Issue Type: Story
>  Components: Client
>Reporter: Jay Buffington
>Assignee: Benjamin Staffin
>Priority: Minor
>
> git commit bcabfce6 introduced limitations on what job environments must be 
> named.  Are these names arbitrary or is there some policy attached to these 
> names?  
> I suspect they are not arbitrary because I believe aurora will preempt tasks 
> that are not in the prod environment to make room for jobs that are.
> What would the ramifications be of removing the "_validate_environment_name" 
> function from src/main/python/apache/aurora/client/config.py ?  Are there 
> reasons why this was introduced in the first place?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)