[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17050475#comment-17050475
]
Rui Wang commented on BEAM-8989:
+1 on tagging it as 2.19.0 and mark as resolved.
> Backwards
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17050048#comment-17050048
]
Ismaël Mejía commented on BEAM-8989:
It seems we don't even need to do anything else, it was already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17047923#comment-17047923
]
Rui Wang commented on BEAM-8989:
Great. So per our discussion above, the resolution of this Jira is:
1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046917#comment-17046917
]
Rui Wang commented on BEAM-8989:
[~wonook] thanks!
[~iemejia] Currently python precommit is broken (see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046625#comment-17046625
]
Won Wook Song commented on BEAM-8989:
-
Luckily, I have happened to notice the change a few weeks ago,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046614#comment-17046614
]
Ismaël Mejía commented on BEAM-8989:
[~amaliujia] is there anything that impeded cutting the branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046612#comment-17046612
]
Ismaël Mejía commented on BEAM-8989:
Yes for you as an user of the API [~wonook] that's what you have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17046605#comment-17046605
]
Won Wook Song commented on BEAM-8989:
-
Would it be sufficient to change the usage of the method from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17045965#comment-17045965
]
Rui Wang commented on BEAM-8989:
Ok. If [~wonook] agrees, I can do 2) per [~iemejia]'s suggestion and Nemo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17045959#comment-17045959
]
Ismaël Mejía commented on BEAM-8989:
This is not an error on Nemo runner. The mistake here is that we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17045793#comment-17045793
]
Rui Wang commented on BEAM-8989:
I moved this Jira version because this Jira seemed not active for a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17045786#comment-17045786
]
Won Wook Song commented on BEAM-8989:
-
Hi there, I'll try to take a look on the Nemo side and see what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17045312#comment-17045312
]
Ismaël Mejía commented on BEAM-8989:
And back to this issue I think we should fix this as part of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17045306#comment-17045306
]
Ismaël Mejía commented on BEAM-8989:
[~amaliujia] please do not change the version of the JIRAs just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17045133#comment-17045133
]
Rui Wang commented on BEAM-8989:
I am going to move this Jira to 2.21.0. Please let me know if you don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17043964#comment-17043964
]
Rui Wang commented on BEAM-8989:
I am going to cut 2.20.0 branch on 02/26/2020. Will you able to push this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17026262#comment-17026262
]
Luke Cwik commented on BEAM-8989:
-
I'm not aware of any progress. Since RC1 is already built it makes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17026109#comment-17026109
]
Boyuan Zhang commented on BEAM-8989:
Is there any progress made on this issue? I have built 2.19.0 RC1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17000308#comment-17000308
]
Udi Meiri commented on BEAM-8989:
-
Decided to push this back to 2.19 since 2.16 already has this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16999734#comment-16999734
]
Kenneth Knowles commented on BEAM-8989:
---
Downgrading to P1/Critical per
20 matches
Mail list logo
