eolivelli commented on issue #1804: [client] read submission for readonly
handle should bypass OSE threads.
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1804#issuecomment-438162643
Okay, we don't need this.
This is an a
eolivelli commented on issue #1804: [client] read submission for readonly
handle should bypass OSE threads.
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1804#issuecomment-438010582
maybe the errors on recovery are due to the fact that reads should strictly
respect the order
---
eolivelli commented on issue #1804: [client] read submission for readonly
handle should bypass OSE threads.
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1804#issuecomment-437918755
there are still a lot of errors
This is an
eolivelli commented on issue #1804: [client] read submission for readonly
handle should bypass OSE threads.
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1804#issuecomment-437870131
retest this please
This is an automated me
eolivelli commented on issue #1804: [client] read submission for readonly
handle should bypass OSE threads.
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/1804#issuecomment-437576491
In client tests there are a lot of failure around fencing.
This is quite scary
-