[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3198) ReduceExpressionsRule.FILTER_INSTANCE does not reduce 'NOT(x=a AND x=b)'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16887746#comment-16887746 ] Ruben Quesada Lopez commented on CALCITE-3198: -- PR available. As mentioned in the previous

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3198) ReduceExpressionsRule.FILTER_INSTANCE does not reduce 'NOT(x=a AND x=b)'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16885912#comment-16885912 ] Ruben Quesada Lopez commented on CALCITE-3198: -- [~julianhyde], you are right. I talked

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3198) ReduceExpressionsRule.FILTER_INSTANCE does not reduce 'NOT(x=a AND x=b)'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16885475#comment-16885475 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3198: -- {{ReduceExpressionsRule}} is about constant reduction

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-3198) ReduceExpressionsRule.FILTER_INSTANCE does not reduce 'NOT(x=a AND x=b)'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16885045#comment-16885045 ] Ruben Quesada Lopez commented on CALCITE-3198: -- Same result is obtained with the following