[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16020703#comment-16020703
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1690:
--
Fixed in Avatica in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16020701#comment-16020701
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CALCITE-1690:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16008755#comment-16008755
]
Ashutosh Chauhan commented on CALCITE-1690:
---
May be its time to drop support for jdk7. jdk8 is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15995892#comment-15995892
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CALCITE-1690:
-
GitHub user julianhyde opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15995879#comment-15995879
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1690:
--
Here's how to create a high-precision timestamp literal:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15989675#comment-15989675
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1690:
--
Turns out that Joda-Time, while similar to java.time,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15987379#comment-15987379
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1690:
--
The SQL standard puts no upper bound on precision. In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15987366#comment-15987366
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1690:
--
Calcite already uses Joda-Time, and its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15907854#comment-15907854
]
Remus Rusanu commented on CALCITE-1690:
---
Any opinion on how to address this? Supporting ANSI