[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10132) Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting algorithms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16381485#comment-16381485 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10132: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2469: CLOUDSTACK-10132: Extend support for management servers LB for agents URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2469#issuecomment-369468980 Trillian test result (tid-2300) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 30863 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr2469-t2300-kvm-centos7.zip Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_hostha_kvm.py Smoke tests completed. 65 look OK, 2 have error(s) Only failed tests results shown below: Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 191.87 | test_privategw_acl.py test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 336.46 | test_privategw_acl.py test_hostha_enable_ha_when_host_in_maintenance | `Error` | 1.94 | test_hostha_kvm.py This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting > algorithms > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0 >Reporter: Nicolas Vazquez >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.12.0.0, 4.11.1.0 > > > Multiple Management Servers Support for agents -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16381401#comment-16381401 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369451877 Trillian test result (tid-2299) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 35592 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr2458-t2299-kvm-centos7.zip Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_public_ip_range.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_templates.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_usage.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_volumes.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_vpc_redundant.py Smoke tests completed. 62 look OK, 5 have error(s) Only failed tests results shown below: Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_03_vpc_privategw_restart_vpc_cleanup | `Failure` | 151.60 | test_privategw_acl.py test_04_extract_template | `Failure` | 128.27 | test_templates.py ContextSuite context=TestISOUsage>:setup | `Error` | 0.00 | test_usage.py test_06_download_detached_volume | `Failure` | 139.67 | test_volumes.py test_04_rvpc_network_garbage_collector_nics | `Failure` | 514.94 | test_vpc_redundant.py This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10257) Create template/volume does not allow to specify HVM requirement
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16381089#comment-16381089 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10257: - rafaelweingartner commented on issue #2437: [CLOUDSTACK-10257]Create template/volume does not allow to specify HVM requirements URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2437#issuecomment-369397722 @khos2ow would you mind reviewing this one? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Create template/volume does not allow to specify HVM requirement > > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10257 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Minor > > Even when creating a template from a snapshot of a ROOT volume, which has a > PV operating system, ACS created the template with flag HVM=1, which may > cause problems to deploy the aforementioned template in environments that do > not have hosts that support HVM. When creating templates from Snapshots or > volumes an option to specify if the template that is going to be created > needs HVM or not should be presented. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10132) Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting algorithms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380858#comment-16380858 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10132: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2469: CLOUDSTACK-10132: Extend support for management servers LB for agents URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2469#issuecomment-369348141 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting > algorithms > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0 >Reporter: Nicolas Vazquez >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.12.0.0, 4.11.1.0 > > > Multiple Management Servers Support for agents -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10132) Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting algorithms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380856#comment-16380856 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10132: - rhtyd commented on issue #2469: CLOUDSTACK-10132: Extend support for management servers LB for agents URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2469#issuecomment-369347995 @blueorangutan test This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting > algorithms > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0 >Reporter: Nicolas Vazquez >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.12.0.0, 4.11.1.0 > > > Multiple Management Servers Support for agents -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10259) Missing float part of secondary storage data when calculating secondary storage usage in listAccounts
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380847#comment-16380847 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10259: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2439: [CLOUDSTACK-10259] Missing float part of secondary storage data in listAccounts method URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2439#issuecomment-369346636 Trillian test result (tid-2294) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 34174 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr2439-t2294-kvm-centos7.zip Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_ssvm.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_hostha_kvm.py Smoke tests completed. 65 look OK, 2 have error(s) Only failed tests results shown below: Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 382.89 | test_privategw_acl.py test_hostha_enable_ha_when_host_in_maintenance | `Error` | 3.10 | test_hostha_kvm.py test_hostha_kvm_host_recovering | `Error` | 8.01 | test_hostha_kvm.py This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Missing float part of secondary storage data when calculating secondary > storage usage in listAccounts > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10259 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Minor > > There is a non-floating points division that is missing the floating part of > the secondary storage usage. This will affect methods that use the following > SET method > org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.AccountResponse.setSecondaryStorageLimit(String). > It affects the listAccounts API method, making it differ from the > updateResource count method, which is presented in bytes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10132) Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting algorithms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380801#comment-16380801 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10132: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2469: CLOUDSTACK-10132: Extend support for management servers LB for agents URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2469#issuecomment-369336980 Trillian test result (tid-2293) Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 33477 seconds Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr2469-t2293-kvm-centos7.zip Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_privategw_acl.py Intermitten failure detected: /marvin/tests/smoke/test_hostha_kvm.py Smoke tests completed. 65 look OK, 2 have error(s) Only failed tests results shown below: Test | Result | Time (s) | Test File --- | --- | --- | --- test_02_vpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 215.78 | test_privategw_acl.py test_04_rvpc_privategw_static_routes | `Failure` | 336.79 | test_privategw_acl.py test_hostha_enable_ha_when_host_in_maintenance | `Error` | 1.17 | test_hostha_kvm.py This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting > algorithms > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0 >Reporter: Nicolas Vazquez >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.12.0.0, 4.11.1.0 > > > Multiple Management Servers Support for agents -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380786#comment-16380786 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268: - rafaelweingartner commented on issue #2433: CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and enhance package script URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#issuecomment-369332416 @rhtyd the other changes you were talking about, are they one "Version.java"? @khos2ow can you explain them further? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix and enhance package script > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.12.0.0 > > > * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains > SNAPSHOT > ** in the final artifacts (jar) name > ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name > ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs > ** in the Management Server > About dialog > * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g. > `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final > generated pacakge name such as following: > ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64` > ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb` > * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag > * handle the new format version for VR version > * fix long opts (they were broken) > * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags > * usage help reformat -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380787#comment-16380787 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268: - rafaelweingartner commented on issue #2433: CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and enhance package script URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#issuecomment-369332416 @rhtyd the other changes you were talking about, are they on "Version.java"? @khos2ow can you explain them further? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix and enhance package script > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.12.0.0 > > > * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains > SNAPSHOT > ** in the final artifacts (jar) name > ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name > ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs > ** in the Management Server > About dialog > * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g. > `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final > generated pacakge name such as following: > ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64` > ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb` > * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag > * handle the new format version for VR version > * fix long opts (they were broken) > * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags > * usage help reformat -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380784#comment-16380784
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268:
-
rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2433:
CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and enhance package script
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#discussion_r171336674
##
File path: tools/build/setnextversion.sh
##
@@ -16,60 +16,125 @@
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
-version='TESTBUILD'
-sourcedir=~/cloudstack/
-branch='master'
+set -e
-usage(){
-echo "usage: $0 -v version [-b branch] [-s source dir] [-h]"
-echo " -v sets the version"
-echo " -b sets the branch (defaults to 'master')"
-echo " -s sets the source directory (defaults to $sourcedir)"
-echo " -h"
+usage() {
+cat << USAGE
+Usage: setnextversion.sh --version string [OPTIONS]...
+Set the next version of CloudStack in the POMs.
+
+Mandatory arguments:
+ -v, --version stringSet the next version to be applied
+
+Optional arguments:
+ -b, --branch string Set the branch to update the
version into (default "master")
+ -s, --sourcedir string Set the source directory to clone
repo into (default "$sourcedir")
+ -n, --no-commit Apply only the version change and
don't git commit them (default "false")
Review comment:
As far as I know we do not have a wiki page to document this script. It
might be interesting to create one though.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Fix and enhance package script
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Packaging
>Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.12.0.0
>
>
> * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains
> SNAPSHOT
> ** in the final artifacts (jar) name
> ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name
> ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs
> ** in the Management Server > About dialog
> * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g.
> `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final
> generated pacakge name such as following:
> ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64`
> ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb`
> * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag
> * handle the new format version for VR version
> * fix long opts (they were broken)
> * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags
> * usage help reformat
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10197) XenServer 7.1: Cannot mount xentool iso from cloudstack on VMs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380778#comment-16380778
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10197:
-
rafaelweingartner commented on issue #2470: [CLOUDSTACK-10197] Update
DisplayText of XenServer tools ISO entry in the database when it already exists
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2470#issuecomment-369331118
@khos2ow thanks for the review.
And yes, those check-style rules are quite annoying. We need to discuss and
change them to better fit the common practice nowadays.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> XenServer 7.1: Cannot mount xentool iso from cloudstack on VMs
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-10197
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10197
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
>Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0
> Environment: XenServer 7.0+
>Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.11.0.0
>
>
> In XenServer 7.0+ xentools iso has been renamed from *xs-tools* to
> *guest-tools* so CloudStack fails to attach it to any VM.
> {code}
> (acs-admin) > attach iso
> virtualmachineid=d13eeff1-2d99-46a9-8fc5-3510df6e9f5e
> id=e8a56540-0fc3-44de-9911-635d2d8f25c4
> errorcode = 530
> errortext = Failed to attach iso
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380747#comment-16380747
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268:
-
khos2ow commented on a change in pull request #2433: CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and
enhance package script
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#discussion_r171329386
##
File path: tools/build/setnextversion.sh
##
@@ -16,60 +16,125 @@
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
-version='TESTBUILD'
-sourcedir=~/cloudstack/
-branch='master'
+set -e
-usage(){
-echo "usage: $0 -v version [-b branch] [-s source dir] [-h]"
-echo " -v sets the version"
-echo " -b sets the branch (defaults to 'master')"
-echo " -s sets the source directory (defaults to $sourcedir)"
-echo " -h"
+usage() {
+cat << USAGE
+Usage: setnextversion.sh --version string [OPTIONS]...
+Set the next version of CloudStack in the POMs.
+
+Mandatory arguments:
+ -v, --version stringSet the next version to be applied
+
+Optional arguments:
+ -b, --branch string Set the branch to update the
version into (default "master")
+ -s, --sourcedir string Set the source directory to clone
repo into (default "$sourcedir")
+ -n, --no-commit Apply only the version change and
don't git commit them (default "false")
Review comment:
Where in wiki? The only place I could find that references
`setnextversion.sh` is
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+Procedure .
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Fix and enhance package script
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Packaging
>Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.12.0.0
>
>
> * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains
> SNAPSHOT
> ** in the final artifacts (jar) name
> ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name
> ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs
> ** in the Management Server > About dialog
> * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g.
> `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final
> generated pacakge name such as following:
> ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64`
> ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb`
> * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag
> * handle the new format version for VR version
> * fix long opts (they were broken)
> * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags
> * usage help reformat
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10197) XenServer 7.1: Cannot mount xentool iso from cloudstack on VMs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380723#comment-16380723
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10197:
-
khos2ow commented on issue #2470: [CLOUDSTACK-10197] Update DisplayText of
XenServer tools ISO entry in the database when it already exists
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2470#issuecomment-369320257
@rafaelweingartner It seems you have some "trailing spaces" issues on
`XcpServerDiscovererTest.java` and couple of variable name issues. The latter
one is really annoying, because it forces to have `^_?[a-zA-Z0-9]*$` for final
variables.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> XenServer 7.1: Cannot mount xentool iso from cloudstack on VMs
> ---
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-10197
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10197
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
>Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0
> Environment: XenServer 7.0+
>Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 4.11.0.0
>
>
> In XenServer 7.0+ xentools iso has been renamed from *xs-tools* to
> *guest-tools* so CloudStack fails to attach it to any VM.
> {code}
> (acs-admin) > attach iso
> virtualmachineid=d13eeff1-2d99-46a9-8fc5-3510df6e9f5e
> id=e8a56540-0fc3-44de-9911-635d2d8f25c4
> errorcode = 530
> errortext = Failed to attach iso
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380653#comment-16380653 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2433: CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and enhance package script URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#issuecomment-369302413 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1747 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix and enhance package script > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.12.0.0 > > > * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains > SNAPSHOT > ** in the final artifacts (jar) name > ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name > ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs > ** in the Management Server > About dialog > * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g. > `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final > generated pacakge name such as following: > ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64` > ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb` > * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag > * handle the new format version for VR version > * fix long opts (they were broken) > * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags > * usage help reformat -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380561#comment-16380561 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268: - rhtyd commented on issue #2433: CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and enhance package script URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#issuecomment-369291280 @rafaelweingartner I'm okay with the change subject to testing. However, I see several new changes in files not related to packaging. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix and enhance package script > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.12.0.0 > > > * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains > SNAPSHOT > ** in the final artifacts (jar) name > ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name > ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs > ** in the Management Server > About dialog > * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g. > `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final > generated pacakge name such as following: > ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64` > ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb` > * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag > * handle the new format version for VR version > * fix long opts (they were broken) > * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags > * usage help reformat -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380560#comment-16380560
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268:
-
rhtyd commented on a change in pull request #2433: CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and
enhance package script
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#discussion_r171297761
##
File path: utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/maint/Version.java
##
@@ -19,59 +19,86 @@
package com.cloud.maint;
+import java.util.regex.Pattern;
+
+import org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils;
+
public class Version {
+public static void main(String[] args) {
Review comment:
Remove main() @khos2ow
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Fix and enhance package script
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Packaging
>Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.12.0.0
>
>
> * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains
> SNAPSHOT
> ** in the final artifacts (jar) name
> ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name
> ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs
> ** in the Management Server > About dialog
> * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g.
> `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final
> generated pacakge name such as following:
> ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64`
> ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb`
> * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag
> * handle the new format version for VR version
> * fix long opts (they were broken)
> * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags
> * usage help reformat
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380559#comment-16380559
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268:
-
rhtyd commented on a change in pull request #2433: CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and
enhance package script
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#discussion_r171297624
##
File path: tools/build/setnextversion.sh
##
@@ -16,60 +16,125 @@
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
-version='TESTBUILD'
-sourcedir=~/cloudstack/
-branch='master'
+set -e
-usage(){
-echo "usage: $0 -v version [-b branch] [-s source dir] [-h]"
-echo " -v sets the version"
-echo " -b sets the branch (defaults to 'master')"
-echo " -s sets the source directory (defaults to $sourcedir)"
-echo " -h"
+usage() {
+cat << USAGE
+Usage: setnextversion.sh --version string [OPTIONS]...
+Set the next version of CloudStack in the POMs.
+
+Mandatory arguments:
+ -v, --version stringSet the next version to be applied
+
+Optional arguments:
+ -b, --branch string Set the branch to update the
version into (default "master")
+ -s, --sourcedir string Set the source directory to clone
repo into (default "$sourcedir")
+ -n, --no-commit Apply only the version change and
don't git commit them (default "false")
Review comment:
@khos2ow @rafaelweingartner please update the wiki as well.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Fix and enhance package script
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Packaging
>Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.12.0.0
>
>
> * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains
> SNAPSHOT
> ** in the final artifacts (jar) name
> ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name
> ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs
> ** in the Management Server > About dialog
> * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g.
> `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final
> generated pacakge name such as following:
> ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64`
> ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb`
> * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag
> * handle the new format version for VR version
> * fix long opts (they were broken)
> * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags
> * usage help reformat
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380556#comment-16380556 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2433: CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and enhance package script URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#issuecomment-369290516 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix and enhance package script > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.12.0.0 > > > * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains > SNAPSHOT > ** in the final artifacts (jar) name > ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name > ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs > ** in the Management Server > About dialog > * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g. > `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final > generated pacakge name such as following: > ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64` > ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb` > * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag > * handle the new format version for VR version > * fix long opts (they were broken) > * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags > * usage help reformat -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10268) Fix and enhance package script
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380553#comment-16380553 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10268: - rhtyd commented on issue #2433: CLOUDSTACK-10268: Fix and enhance package script URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2433#issuecomment-369290181 @blueorangutan package This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix and enhance package script > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10268 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10268 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Packaging >Reporter: Khosrow Moossavi >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.12.0.0 > > > * new flag `-T, --use-timestamp` to use `timestamp` when POM version contains > SNAPSHOT > ** in the final artifacts (jar) name > ** in the final package (rpm, deb) name > ** in `/etc/cloudstack-release` file of SystemVMs > ** in the Management Server > About dialog > * if there's a "branding" string in the POM version (e.g. > `x.y.z.a-NAME[-SNAPSHOT]`), the branding name will be used in the final > generated pacakge name such as following: > ** `cloudstack-management-x.y.z.a-NAME.NUMBER.el7.centos.x86_64` > ** `cloudstack-management_x.y.z.a-NAME-NUMBER~xenial_all.deb` > * branding string can be overriden with newly added `-b, --brand` flag > * handle the new format version for VR version > * fix long opts (they were broken) > * tolerate and show a warning message for unrecognized flags > * usage help reformat -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10240) ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380535#comment-16380535 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10240: - rafaelweingartner commented on issue #2425: [CLOUDSTACK-10240] ACS cannot migrate a local volume to shared storage URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2425#issuecomment-369288296 @DaanHoogland thanks for the explanations. Yes I was considering false positive/negative differently, but as long as we are able to explain them further as you did, we can understand each other. So, it seems that most of these failures are due to runtime issues, normally from timeouts. Moreover, as far as we know it is not possible for the tests to return with a "success" message, when there is a problem. Unless, of course, if there is a problem/case that the current tests do not cover. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer) > > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10240 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Major > > CloudStack is logically restricting the migration of local storages to shared > storage and vice versa. This restriction is a logical one and can be removed > for XenServer deployments. Therefore, we will enable migration of volumes > between local-shared storages in XenServers independently of their service > offering. This will work as an override mechanism to the disk offering used > by volumes. If administrators want to migrate local volumes to a shared > storage, they should be able to do so (the hypervisor already allows that). > The same the other way around. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380525#comment-16380525 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369286076 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380517#comment-16380517 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - rhtyd commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369285874 @blueorangutan test This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380523#comment-16380523 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - rhtyd commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369221396 @blueorangutan package This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380520#comment-16380520 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - rhtyd commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-368840600 @blueorangutan test This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380519#comment-16380519 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369221589 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380524#comment-16380524 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-368788862 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380521#comment-16380521 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-368802621 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1736 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380522#comment-16380522 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-368840865 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380518#comment-16380518 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369230666 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1743 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380512#comment-16380512 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369284760 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1745 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380387#comment-16380387 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369258939 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380385#comment-16380385 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - rhtyd commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369258652 @blueorangutan package This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10240) ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380302#comment-16380302 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10240: - DaanHoogland commented on issue #2425: [CLOUDSTACK-10240] ACS cannot migrate a local volume to shared storage URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2425#issuecomment-369239103 @rafaelweingartner , first to clarify; my understanding of flase positive and false negitive is reversed from yours; a false positive: a bug is reported but it isn't there a false negative: a bug is not reported in spite of being there kind of like in the doping control mafia; positive means your busted. maybe a bit counter intuitive but I'll run with it (pun as happy accident) So more more to the point, a false positive might be due to a timing issue that occurs because of the nested nature of the test environment, and isn't a real issue. I can think of no false negative counterpart for that. maybe we can think of more examples of the reverse but the issue is that we need to assess on each failure if it is noteworthy and we need to keep doing code reviews. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer) > > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10240 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Major > > CloudStack is logically restricting the migration of local storages to shared > storage and vice versa. This restriction is a logical one and can be removed > for XenServer deployments. Therefore, we will enable migration of volumes > between local-shared storages in XenServers independently of their service > offering. This will work as an override mechanism to the disk offering used > by volumes. If administrators want to migrate local volumes to a shared > storage, they should be able to do so (the hypervisor already allows that). > The same the other way around. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10240) ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380303#comment-16380303 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10240: - DaanHoogland commented on issue #2425: [CLOUDSTACK-10240] ACS cannot migrate a local volume to shared storage URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2425#issuecomment-369239103 @rafaelweingartner , first to clarify; my understanding of false positive and false negitive is reversed from yours; a false positive: a bug is reported but it isn't there a false negative: a bug is not reported in spite of being there kind of like in the doping control mafia; positive means your busted. maybe a bit counter intuitive but I'll run with it (pun as happy accident) So more more to the point, a false positive might be due to a timing issue that occurs because of the nested nature of the test environment, and isn't a real issue. I can think of no false negative counterpart for that. maybe we can think of more examples of the reverse but the issue is that we need to assess on each failure if it is noteworthy and we need to keep doing code reviews. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer) > > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10240 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Major > > CloudStack is logically restricting the migration of local storages to shared > storage and vice versa. This restriction is a logical one and can be removed > for XenServer deployments. Therefore, we will enable migration of volumes > between local-shared storages in XenServers independently of their service > offering. This will work as an override mechanism to the disk offering used > by volumes. If administrators want to migrate local volumes to a shared > storage, they should be able to do so (the hypervisor already allows that). > The same the other way around. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380258#comment-16380258 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369230666 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-1743 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380194#comment-16380194 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369221589 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10296) Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380193#comment-16380193 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10296: - rhtyd commented on issue #2458: CLOUDSTACK-10296: Find time different from last timestamp URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458#issuecomment-369221396 @blueorangutan package This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Fix timestamp difference in heartbeat script for rVRs > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10296 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10296 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0, 4.9.3.0 >Reporter: Rohit Yadav >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.11.1.1 > > > Raised recently on dev@ ML by Jayakartheek, the difference code in heartbeat > checker script for rVRs wrongly take difference, that will always be less > than or equal to 0. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10312) keealived.log will end up filling ramdisk partition on RVR, As timestamp comparison is wrong
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380185#comment-16380185 ] Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-10312: -- Ongoing PR [https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2458.] This ticket dupes CLOUDSTACK-10296 > keealived.log will end up filling ramdisk partition on RVR, As timestamp > comparison is wrong > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10312 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10312 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) > Components: Virtual Router >Affects Versions: 4.6.0, 4.11.0.0 >Reporter: jay >Priority: Major > > coding error in how the time stamp is compared in check_heartbeat.sh file . > thistime=$(cat $ROUTER_BIN_PATH/keepalived.ts) > lasttime=$(cat $ROUTER_BIN_PATH/keepalived.ts2) > diff=$(($lasttime - $thistime)) > s=0 > if [ $diff -ge 10 ] > lasttime will never be greater then current time and IF condition will always > fail > related commit ID : > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/587/files#diff-002a85328505a > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-10313) Remove branches 4.6.*-RC*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael Weingärtner updated CLOUDSTACK-10313:
Due Date: 9/Mar/18
> Remove branches 4.6.*-RC*
> -
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-10313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10313
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
>Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner
>Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner
>Priority: Major
>
> Remove branches matching the REGEX:
> {code:java}
> 4.6.*-RC*
> {code}
> from Apache CloudStack official repository.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-10313) Remove branches 4.6.*-RC*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael Weingärtner updated CLOUDSTACK-10313:
Description:
Remove branches matching the REGEX:
{code:java}
4.6.*-RC*
{code}
from Apache CloudStack official repository.
was:
Remove branches matching the REGEX: 4.6.*-RC*
from Apache CloudStack official repository.
> Remove branches 4.6.*-RC*
> -
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-10313
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10313
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
>Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner
>Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner
>Priority: Major
>
> Remove branches matching the REGEX:
> {code:java}
> 4.6.*-RC*
> {code}
> from Apache CloudStack official repository.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-10313) Remove branches 4.6.*-RC*
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rafael Weingärtner updated CLOUDSTACK-10313: Description: Remove branches matching the REGEX: 4.6.*-RC* from Apache CloudStack official repository. > Remove branches 4.6.*-RC* > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10313 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10313 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Major > > Remove branches matching the REGEX: 4.6.*-RC* > from Apache CloudStack official repository. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-10313) Remove branches 4.6.*-RC*
Rafael Weingärtner created CLOUDSTACK-10313: --- Summary: Remove branches 4.6.*-RC* Key: CLOUDSTACK-10313 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10313 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Sub-task Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10240) ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380168#comment-16380168 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10240: - rafaelweingartner commented on issue #2425: [CLOUDSTACK-10240] ACS cannot migrate a local volume to shared storage URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2425#issuecomment-369214377 The one I remember right now is the HA test, which I have seen failing in PRs 2438 and 2469. My doubt is the following, as long as we have false negatives (showing that there is a problem, when there isn't), can't we have false positive (showing that everything is ok, when it is not) as well? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer) > > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10240 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Major > > CloudStack is logically restricting the migration of local storages to shared > storage and vice versa. This restriction is a logical one and can be removed > for XenServer deployments. Therefore, we will enable migration of volumes > between local-shared storages in XenServers independently of their service > offering. This will work as an override mechanism to the disk offering used > by volumes. If administrators want to migrate local volumes to a shared > storage, they should be able to do so (the hypervisor already allows that). > The same the other way around. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10240) ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16380165#comment-16380165 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10240: - DaanHoogland commented on issue #2425: [CLOUDSTACK-10240] ACS cannot migrate a local volume to shared storage URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2425#issuecomment-369212735 These are nested environments in which we test so they might be false positives as you imply by your question. I think we still need to check the errors. What PR shows these? I saw failures today but nowhere the exact same bunch, @rafaelweingartner ? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > ACS cannot migrate a volume from local to shared storage (for XenServer) > > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10240 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10240 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Major > > CloudStack is logically restricting the migration of local storages to shared > storage and vice versa. This restriction is a logical one and can be removed > for XenServer deployments. Therefore, we will enable migration of volumes > between local-shared storages in XenServers independently of their service > offering. This will work as an override mechanism to the disk offering used > by volumes. If administrators want to migrate local volumes to a shared > storage, they should be able to do so (the hypervisor already allows that). > The same the other way around. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-10169) Clean up old and obsolete branches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rafael Weingärtner updated CLOUDSTACK-10169:
Description:
The following is full list of branches available on
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack and the old ones can be deleted.
||Branch name||Ticket number||POM version||Last updated||Last commit||HEAD on
master||PR number||Should be deleted||
|4.0|-|4.0.2|Jul 19
2013|[8f4b9bc|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/8f4b9bccfed63a37762907bdd058506f4e7b6e6d)]|No|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.1|-|4.1.2-SNAPSHOT|Dec 10
2013|[1b7c886|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/1b7c886bb1a4cd28840a13e199fedc8c2e865011)]|No|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.10|-|4.10.1.0-SNAPSHOT|Nov 16
2017|[330f241|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/330f24117cc5c90b85db291981652a2191417d5a)]|Yes|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.1l10n|-|4.1.0-SNAPSHOT|Feb 27
2013|[80b9b25|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/80b9b255ae641a238b6d626e5a8bda9e958d99a8)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.2|-|4.2.1-SNAPSHOT|May 13
2015|[709e0c0|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/709e0c093fc280cee79b30c7ee0a11331ebbae57)]|No|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.2-forward|-|4.2.0-SNAPSHOT|May 31
2014|[6196958|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/6196958a76bfda706da52ad42fd479db4bc047b9)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.2-workplace|-|4.2.1-SNAPSHOT|Dec 11
2013|[f9dd2c9|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/f9dd2c9d483ba35768d3b80deefb74f54282ae5a)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.3|-|4.3.2|Aug 12
2015|[c116ca9|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/c116ca968e552f079e1ebfe855b4bfa02d368f74)]|No|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.3.0-forward|-|4.3.0|Apr 3
2014|[825929d|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/825929d7e98cbd680c57ff424f987bbb0b0aff62)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.4|-|4.4.5-SNAPSHOT|Sep 1
2015|[b0a4593|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/b0a45931527cb57e4d23edab36adf4fac1ffa494)]|No|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.4-automation|-|4.4.0-SNAPSHOT|May 5
2014|[87205f9|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/87205f955523556a1aad5da72360c67f0b8ba697)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.4-forward|-|4.4.0-SNAPSHOT|Aug 6
2014|[30ca56a|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/30ca56aff85e3d61708ec35dd49fdd34beea69f1)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.4-forward-iam|-|4.4.0-SNAPSHOT|May 23
2014|[9d676d0|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/9d676d0d366484eebd425da3cde66c922a03edfb)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.4-forward-iam-disabled|-|4.4.0-SNAPSHOT|May 16
2014|[d1f6120|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d1f6120c43cc66c85f5d84f7b48014bfc641589d)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.5|-|4.5.3-SNAPSHOT|Oct 18
2016|[e731c70|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/e731c70cf7ab72b593cde10af8e49673a21b9f9c)]|No|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.5.2.1-security-RC20160525T1207|-|4.5.2.1|May 25
2016|[7059c29|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/7059c29e940f9e1321eee2b35ff045c2eb655df3)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.6|-|4.6.3-SNAPSHOT|Oct 18
2016|[08b4052|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/08b40525955881869340a8ae3b268dea6edd926b)]|No|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.6.0-RC20151104T1522|-|4.6.0|Nov 4
2015|[b0ebe68|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/b0ebe68e375432b28eef031ab62ccd5831234c77)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.6.0-RC20151110T1545|-|4.6.0|Nov 10
2015|[e31ade0|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/e31ade03c66368c64f0cd66cb7b0b754cddfb79d)]|Yes|-|Yes|
|4.6.1-RC20151130T2246|-|4.6.1|Nov 30
2015|[3913fc8|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/3913fc88c93244115c37d9e4b4c669a8bfd83286)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.6.1-RC20151130T2258|-|4.6.1|Nov 30
2015|[beb840f|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/beb840fc1cdfa5ba3c76ce4071cf5c4b775362cd)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.6.2-RC20151213T1914|-|4.6.2|Dec 13
2015|[10e0130|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/10e0130dd6e0c06deae4f5ccfd43d5bcecea57b6)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.6.2.1-RC20160525T1218|-|4.6.2.1|May 25
2016|[bc2e2cf|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/bc2e2cf427934943cf2af88830de1dec93edcca6)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.7|-|4.7.2-SNAPSHOT|Nov 8
2016|[0279ac2|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/0279ac20e46cbbc7f699dc41eafbe31fe0c4797b)]|Yes|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.7.0-RC20151213T2109|-|4.7.0|Dec 13
2015|[2f26a85|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/2f26a859a971a9852ed9f6f34fe35e52fe6028a9)]|Yes|-|Yes|
|4.7.1-RC20160120T2318|-|4.7.1|Jan 20
2016|[5ea07dc|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/5ea07dc93799f28dd6c268b17514867d92dc53f7)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.7.1.1-RC20160525T1230|-|4.7.1.1|May 25
2016|[781775a|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/781775a31f6c0f08043cb6f73494628e71fb)]|No|-|Yes|
|4.8|-|4.8.2.0-SNAPSHOT|Feb 28
2017|[113ce13|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/113ce13bda9d4a095ff3a22d6fedf925117f4f6f)]|Yes|-|{color:#d04437}*No*{color}|
|4.8.0-RC20160120T2343|-|4.8.0|Jan 20
2016|[62f218b|https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/62f218b7bd005d201d1c8516180d8e6d6797)]|Yes|-|Yes|
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10259) Missing float part of secondary storage data when calculating secondary storage usage in listAccounts
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16379992#comment-16379992 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10259: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2439: [CLOUDSTACK-10259] Missing float part of secondary storage data in listAccounts method URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2439#issuecomment-369167781 @borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Missing float part of secondary storage data when calculating secondary > storage usage in listAccounts > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10259 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Minor > > There is a non-floating points division that is missing the floating part of > the secondary storage usage. This will affect methods that use the following > SET method > org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.AccountResponse.setSecondaryStorageLimit(String). > It affects the listAccounts API method, making it differ from the > updateResource count method, which is presented in bytes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10259) Missing float part of secondary storage data when calculating secondary storage usage in listAccounts
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16379991#comment-16379991 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10259: - borisstoyanov commented on issue #2439: [CLOUDSTACK-10259] Missing float part of secondary storage data in listAccounts method URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2439#issuecomment-369167711 @blueorangutan test This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Missing float part of secondary storage data when calculating secondary > storage usage in listAccounts > -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10259 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10259 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Reporter: Rafael Weingärtner >Assignee: Rafael Weingärtner >Priority: Minor > > There is a non-floating points division that is missing the floating part of > the secondary storage usage. This will affect methods that use the following > SET method > org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.AccountResponse.setSecondaryStorageLimit(String). > It affects the listAccounts API method, making it differ from the > updateResource count method, which is presented in bytes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10132) Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting algorithms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16379962#comment-16379962 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10132: - blueorangutan commented on issue #2469: CLOUDSTACK-10132: Extend support for management servers LB for agents URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2469#issuecomment-369163049 @rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting > algorithms > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0 >Reporter: Nicolas Vazquez >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.12.0.0, 4.11.1.0 > > > Multiple Management Servers Support for agents -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-10132) Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting algorithms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16379961#comment-16379961 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-10132: - rhtyd commented on issue #2469: CLOUDSTACK-10132: Extend support for management servers LB for agents URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2469#issuecomment-369162909 @blueorangutan test This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org > Extend Multiple Management Servers Support for agents to allow sorting > algorithms > - > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-10132 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10132 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the > default.) >Affects Versions: 4.11.0.0 >Reporter: Nicolas Vazquez >Assignee: Rohit Yadav >Priority: Major > Fix For: 4.12.0.0, 4.11.1.0 > > > Multiple Management Servers Support for agents -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
