[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6530) Populate first class entities in the context parameter
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13983847#comment-13983847 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6530: - Commit 3e7ea4e8d99a92872007f11a09ab87c8ba61e1da in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~nitinme] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=3e7ea4e ] CLOUDSTACK-6530: Populate the first class entities in the context to be available for publishing more information for the event bus, checking the displayable property etc. Populate first class entities in the context parameter -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6530 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6530 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Reporter: Nitin Mehta Assignee: Nitin Mehta Populate the first class entities in the context to be available for publishing more information for the event bus, checking the displayable property etc. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6530) Populate first class entities in the context parameter
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13983848#comment-13983848 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6530: - Commit dd55095fd5a1e3b9ea4e6f10f00e47495d7fb167 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~nitinme] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=dd55095 ] CLOUDSTACK-6530: Populate the first class entities in the context to be available for publishing more information for the event bus, checking the displayable property etc. (cherry picked from commit 3e7ea4e8d99a92872007f11a09ab87c8ba61e1da) Populate first class entities in the context parameter -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6530 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6530 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Reporter: Nitin Mehta Assignee: Nitin Mehta Populate the first class entities in the context to be available for publishing more information for the event bus, checking the displayable property etc. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4371) [Performance Testing] Basic zone with 20K Hosts, management server restart leaves the hosts in disconnected state for very long time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984012#comment-13984012
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4371:
-
Commit de114f554895c24c0d25106a775f1405eac79c6d in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~koushikd]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=de114f5 ]
CLOUDSTACK-4371: [Performance Testing] Basic zone with 20K Hosts, management
server restart leaves the hosts in disconnected state for very long time
Fixed simulator code to handle local storage during host reconnect
[Performance Testing] Basic zone with 20K Hosts, management server restart
leaves the hosts in disconnected state for very long time
Key: CLOUDSTACK-4371
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4371
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.2.0
Environment: Basic zone, with over 20K simulator hosts
Reporter: Sowmya Krishnan
Assignee: Koushik Das
Labels: performance
Fix For: 4.3.0
Attachments: agenttaskpool_334.log, ms1_restartfail.log.gz,
ms2_restartfail.log.gz, ms3_restartfail.log.gz
Basic zone performance test bed:
20K simulator hosts,
3 Management servers
1 host/cluster
Local storage
Java heap size: 12GB
db.cloud.maxActive=2000
direct.agent.load.size=1000
agent.lb.enabled=true
Deploy around 20K simulator hosts with 3 Management servers clustered
(Not deployed any VMs yet)
After all hosts are deployed, stop all 3 Management servers and then start
all 3 one after another
Result
=
Hosts don't get to connected state at all even after 10 minutes. While around
2K of them go into alert state while rest are in disconnected state.
mysql select count(*), status, resource_state, type, mgmt_server_id from
host group by mgmt_server_id, status, type, resource_state;
+--+--++++
| count(*) | status | resource_state | type |
mgmt_server_id |
+--+--++++
| 1946 | Alert| Enabled| Routing|
NULL |
|18054 | Disconnected | Enabled| Routing|
NULL |
|1 | Disconnected | Enabled| SecondaryStorageVM |
NULL |
+--+--++++
3 rows in set (0.11 sec)
MS Logs show lot of storage pool exceptions while hosts try to get connected:
2013-08-16 05:49:25,592 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Seq 13-32440322: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
206915885094132, via: 13, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{com.cloud.agen
t.api.CleanupNetworkRulesCmd:{interval:2028,wait:0}}] }
2013-08-16 05:49:25,592 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Seq 13-32440322: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId:
206915885094132, via: 13, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{com.cloud.a
gent.api.CleanupNetworkRulesCmd:{interval:2028,wait:0}}] }
2013-08-16 05:49:25,592 DEBUG [xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer]
(AgentTaskPool-14:null) Not XenServer so moving on.
2013-08-16 05:49:25,592 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-14:null) Sending Connect to listener:
DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_76f3d8e4
2013-08-16 05:49:25,591 DEBUG [cloud.resource.AgentResourceBase]
(ClusteredAgentManager Timer:null) Deserializing simulated agent on reconnect
2013-08-16 05:49:25,594 INFO [network.security.SecurityGroupListener]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2028
2013-08-16 05:49:25,594 INFO [network.security.SecurityGroupListener]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Received a host startup notification
2013-08-16 05:49:25,595 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Sending Connect to listener: StoragePoolMonitor
...
...
2013-08-16 05:49:25,761 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Sending Connect to listener:
ClusteredVirtualMachineManagerImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_b5459b7b
2013-08-16 05:49:25,764 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Found 0 VMs for host 13
2013-08-16 05:49:25,765 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Sending Connect to listener: LocalStoragePoolListener
2013-08-16 05:49:25,768 DEBUG
[datastore.lifecycle.CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycleImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) createPool
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4371) [Performance Testing] Basic zone with 20K Hosts, management server restart leaves the hosts in disconnected state for very long time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984040#comment-13984040
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4371:
-
Commit 8d92d00c87b34eea77119dda64f9870b1e078a6c in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~koushikd]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=8d92d00 ]
CLOUDSTACK-4371: [Performance Testing] Basic zone with 20K Hosts, management
server restart leaves the hosts in disconnected state for very long time
Fixed simulator code to handle local storage during host reconnect
[Performance Testing] Basic zone with 20K Hosts, management server restart
leaves the hosts in disconnected state for very long time
Key: CLOUDSTACK-4371
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4371
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.2.0
Environment: Basic zone, with over 20K simulator hosts
Reporter: Sowmya Krishnan
Assignee: Koushik Das
Labels: performance
Fix For: 4.3.0
Attachments: agenttaskpool_334.log, ms1_restartfail.log.gz,
ms2_restartfail.log.gz, ms3_restartfail.log.gz
Basic zone performance test bed:
20K simulator hosts,
3 Management servers
1 host/cluster
Local storage
Java heap size: 12GB
db.cloud.maxActive=2000
direct.agent.load.size=1000
agent.lb.enabled=true
Deploy around 20K simulator hosts with 3 Management servers clustered
(Not deployed any VMs yet)
After all hosts are deployed, stop all 3 Management servers and then start
all 3 one after another
Result
=
Hosts don't get to connected state at all even after 10 minutes. While around
2K of them go into alert state while rest are in disconnected state.
mysql select count(*), status, resource_state, type, mgmt_server_id from
host group by mgmt_server_id, status, type, resource_state;
+--+--++++
| count(*) | status | resource_state | type |
mgmt_server_id |
+--+--++++
| 1946 | Alert| Enabled| Routing|
NULL |
|18054 | Disconnected | Enabled| Routing|
NULL |
|1 | Disconnected | Enabled| SecondaryStorageVM |
NULL |
+--+--++++
3 rows in set (0.11 sec)
MS Logs show lot of storage pool exceptions while hosts try to get connected:
2013-08-16 05:49:25,592 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Seq 13-32440322: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
206915885094132, via: 13, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{com.cloud.agen
t.api.CleanupNetworkRulesCmd:{interval:2028,wait:0}}] }
2013-08-16 05:49:25,592 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Seq 13-32440322: Executing: { Cmd , MgmtId:
206915885094132, via: 13, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{com.cloud.a
gent.api.CleanupNetworkRulesCmd:{interval:2028,wait:0}}] }
2013-08-16 05:49:25,592 DEBUG [xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer]
(AgentTaskPool-14:null) Not XenServer so moving on.
2013-08-16 05:49:25,592 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-14:null) Sending Connect to listener:
DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_76f3d8e4
2013-08-16 05:49:25,591 DEBUG [cloud.resource.AgentResourceBase]
(ClusteredAgentManager Timer:null) Deserializing simulated agent on reconnect
2013-08-16 05:49:25,594 INFO [network.security.SecurityGroupListener]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2028
2013-08-16 05:49:25,594 INFO [network.security.SecurityGroupListener]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Received a host startup notification
2013-08-16 05:49:25,595 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Sending Connect to listener: StoragePoolMonitor
...
...
2013-08-16 05:49:25,761 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Sending Connect to listener:
ClusteredVirtualMachineManagerImpl_EnhancerByCloudStack_b5459b7b
2013-08-16 05:49:25,764 DEBUG [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Found 0 VMs for host 13
2013-08-16 05:49:25,765 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) Sending Connect to listener: LocalStoragePoolListener
2013-08-16 05:49:25,768 DEBUG
[datastore.lifecycle.CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycleImpl]
(AgentTaskPool-12:null) createPool Params @
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6170) Support managed storage for root disks
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984048#comment-13984048 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6170: - Commit 934056097a638c1563f067b4236ad4c37211e9db in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~mike-tutkowski] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=9340560 ] CLOUDSTACK-6170 Needed to add logic for XS 6.2 + XS62ESP1 + XS62ESP1004 Support managed storage for root disks -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: I expect to support managed storage for root disks on XenServer and ESX (KVM is targeted for 4.5). Reporter: Mike Tutkowski Assignee: Mike Tutkowski Fix For: 4.4.0 Cloud environments have a need for guaranteed storage performance. By this I mean having the ability to specify a minimum and maximum number of IOPS on a volume-by-volume basis. I added support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.2 for data disks. I added support for this for KVM in 4.3 for data disks. It is my intent to add support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.4 for root disks (with subsequent support for root disks on KVM expected in 4.5). The main changes are expected to occur in CloudStack logic that controls hypervisors and additions to the way root-volume orchestration happens. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6509) Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984075#comment-13984075 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6509: - Commit 9303e7016b8c2d20c8bf7d86dcde738983552d4e in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.3 from [~rajanik] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=9303e70 ] Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6509 Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account Signed-off-by: Koushik Das kous...@apache.org Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6509 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6509 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Reporter: Rajani Karuturi Assignee: Rajani Karuturi Priority: Critical Labels: ldap Fix For: 4.4.0, 4.3.1 in the ldap add account popup, select multiple users and specify an account name. it fails with errror account with the name already exists. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-5674) [Automation]: Enhancements to accommodate multiple regression runs on a single CS server
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984082#comment-13984082 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-5674: - Commit dcd3ce5ce03eeb0675776622e757e6e638cb433d in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-automation from SrikanteswaraRao Talluri [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=dcd3ce5 ] CLOUDSTACK-5674:Fixes for BVT and Regression test failures. Signed-off-by: SrikanteswaraRao Talluri tall...@apache.org [Automation]: Enhancements to accommodate multiple regression runs on a single CS server Key: CLOUDSTACK-5674 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5674 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation, marvin Reporter: Santhosh Kumar Edukulla Assignee: Santhosh Kumar Edukulla 1. Currently, we will not be able to run multiple regression runs on a given CS server either sequentially\parallelly reason being few hard codings done at various places. 2. So, the idea is to run complete regression\automation test suites at one stretch on a given setup post deployDC. We deploy multiple zones with different hypervisor type in each zone. 3. Tests should cut down time and run across multiple zones with different hypervisor type in each zone, post deployment 3. The fixes and new changes should incorporate to take care to run suites parallelly if we wanted or sequentially for various test suites like vmware,xen,kvm etc on single CS machine without disturbing\redeploying and installing the new CS instance. Phase1: We will make framework\marvin changes. Phase2: Incorporate test module changes for these. Adding this ticket to track these changes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6271) Integrate Deploy DB Into windows msi installer
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984144#comment-13984144 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6271: - Commit 29b4fe6d9f94739c11a368a52cf0122916b1e4d2 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~damoder.reddy] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=29b4fe6 ] CLOUDSTACK-6271: The cloud-setup-databases was failing when your jasypt jar path has spaces in it's path Integrate Deploy DB Into windows msi installer -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6271 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6271 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Damodar Reddy T Assignee: Damodar Reddy T Fix For: 4.4.0 Currently MSI Installer assumes that the back end DB is already created. But going further deploy db should be part of installation instead of assumption. of existence -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6509) Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984145#comment-13984145 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6509: - Commit 08ec6ebddaf5a5cddab2be8dfcebf75b91dafa92 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~rajanik] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=08ec6eb ] Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6509 Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account Conflicts: api/src/com/cloud/user/AccountService.java plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/LdapCreateAccountCmd.java plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/LdapImportUsersCmd.java Signed-off-by: Koushik Das kous...@apache.org Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6509 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6509 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Reporter: Rajani Karuturi Assignee: Rajani Karuturi Priority: Critical Labels: ldap Fix For: 4.4.0, 4.3.1 in the ldap add account popup, select multiple users and specify an account name. it fails with errror account with the name already exists. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6509) Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984149#comment-13984149 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6509: - Commit f4779b4d0ce9fddc80c8df91b594e3991b56af58 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~rajanik] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=f4779b4 ] Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6509 Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account Conflicts: api/src/com/cloud/user/AccountService.java plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/LdapCreateAccountCmd.java plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/LdapImportUsersCmd.java Signed-off-by: Koushik Das kous...@apache.org Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6509 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6509 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Reporter: Rajani Karuturi Assignee: Rajani Karuturi Priority: Critical Labels: ldap Fix For: 4.4.0, 4.3.1 in the ldap add account popup, select multiple users and specify an account name. it fails with errror account with the name already exists. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6170) Support managed storage for root disks
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984184#comment-13984184 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6170: - Commit 815e39117320d36fcf608b4dd441442727e2eaff in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~mike-tutkowski] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=815e391 ] CLOUDSTACK-6170 Needed to add logic for XS 6.2 + XS62ESP1 + XS62ESP1004 Support managed storage for root disks -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: I expect to support managed storage for root disks on XenServer and ESX (KVM is targeted for 4.5). Reporter: Mike Tutkowski Assignee: Mike Tutkowski Fix For: 4.4.0 Cloud environments have a need for guaranteed storage performance. By this I mean having the ability to specify a minimum and maximum number of IOPS on a volume-by-volume basis. I added support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.2 for data disks. I added support for this for KVM in 4.3 for data disks. It is my intent to add support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.4 for root disks (with subsequent support for root disks on KVM expected in 4.5). The main changes are expected to occur in CloudStack logic that controls hypervisors and additions to the way root-volume orchestration happens. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6530) Populate first class entities in the context parameter
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984210#comment-13984210 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6530: - Commit 8eb903ba487902b25a889a2003b291af4cfb154c in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~nitinme] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=8eb903b ] CLOUDSTACK-6530: Populate the first class entities in the context to be available for publishing more information for the event bus, checking the displayable property etc. Populate first class entities in the context parameter -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6530 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6530 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Reporter: Nitin Mehta Assignee: Nitin Mehta Populate the first class entities in the context to be available for publishing more information for the event bus, checking the displayable property etc. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6509) Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984214#comment-13984214 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6509: - Commit 69e550f5ea0ea1b85adcce6366d97cffa0276e73 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~rajanik] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=69e550f ] Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6509 Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account Conflicts: api/src/com/cloud/user/AccountService.java plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/LdapCreateAccountCmd.java plugins/user-authenticators/ldap/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/LdapImportUsersCmd.java Signed-off-by: Koushik Das kous...@apache.org Cannot import multiple LDAP/AD users into a cloudstack account -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6509 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6509 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Reporter: Rajani Karuturi Assignee: Rajani Karuturi Priority: Critical Labels: ldap Fix For: 4.4.0, 4.3.1 in the ldap add account popup, select multiple users and specify an account name. it fails with errror account with the name already exists. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6533) IAM - Templates - Public templates do not have permissions to be used by ROOT group.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13984665#comment-13984665 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6533: - Commit b2b59ed83a566762c960371717b7998b4719ba70 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=b2b59ed ] CLOUDSTACK-6533: IAM - Templates - Public templates do not have permissions to be used by ROOT group. IAM - Templates - Public templates do not have permissions to be used by ROOT group. Key: CLOUDSTACK-6533 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6533 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Templates - Public templates do not have permissions to be used by ROOT group. As regular user create a public template. In iam_policy_permission policy we do not have permission for Admin group. mysql select * from iam_policy_permission where scope_id = 206; +--+---+---++--+--+-++---+-+-+ | id | policy_id | action| resource_type | scope_id | scope| access_type | permission | recursive | removed | created | +--+---+---++--+--+-++---+-+-+ | 4949 | 3 | listTemplates | VirtualMachineTemplate | 206 | RESOURCE | UseEntry| Allow | 0 | NULL| 2014-04-29 11:03:52 | | 4950 | 1 | listTemplates | VirtualMachineTemplate | 206 | RESOURCE | UseEntry| Allow | 0 | NULL| 2014-04-29 11:03:52 | mysql select * from vm_template where id=206; +-+--++--++--+--+-+--+-++-+-++--+-+-+---+-+--+-+-+-+-++--+--+-++--+-+--+ | id | unique_name | name | uuid | public | featured | type | hvm | bits | url | format | created | removed | account_id | checksum | display_text| enable_password | enable_sshkey | guest_os_id | bootable | prepopulate | cross_zones | extractable | hypervisor_type | source_template_id | template_tag | sort_key | size| state | update_count | updated | dynamically_scalable | +-+--++--++--+--+-+--+-++-+-++--+-+-+---+-+--+-+-+-+-++--+--+-++--+-+--+ | 206 | 206-318-179129bc-531f-31fe-a21d-23a8aa7b666f | Public_featured_d2a-G3GJQW | 265192c9-88d3-41d4-b435-6d3c3e5d256a | 1 | 1 | USER | 1 | 64 | http://10.223.110.232:/test.vhd | VHD| 2014-04-29 11:03:52 | NULL|318 | NULL | public and feature Template | 0 | 0 | 12 |1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Simulator | NULL | NULL |0 | 5242880 | Active |0 | NULL| 0 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6532) Affinity Groups - As admin user, not able to list all affinity groups available for regular users by passing account and domainId paramater.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985023#comment-13985023
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6532:
-
Commit 0767060b1f4cf96db721bd625971345fbda4c48c in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=0767060 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6532:Affinity Groups - As admin user, not able to list all
affinity groups available for regular users by passing account and
domainId paramater. This is to revert IAM way of implementing
listAffinityGroupsCmd, will bring it back when we have implemented real
impersonation.
Affinity Groups - As admin user, not able to list all affinity groups
available for regular users by passing account and domainId paramater.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6532
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6532
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Build from 4.4
Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0
Create an anti-affinity group as regular user.
As admin user, try to list all affinity groups available for regular users by
passing account and domainId parameter.
http://10.223.49.6:8080/client/api?command=listAffinityGroupsresponse=jsonsessionkey=okCw58hoD%2BrUSZ9NO5LKHz6ie9U%3D_=1398792364257account=testD1A-TestVMList-U27DEVdomainId=71dcc0ac-c230-4e96-97ad-6e4f3ddc53cf
No affinity group is listed.
As regular user:
{ listaffinitygroupsresponse : { count:1 ,affinitygroup : [
{id:bee9a7c5-3124-46b6-b258-893c8c9cc244,name:test-123,description:test-123,account:testD1A-TestVMList-U27DEV,domainid:71dcc0ac-c230-4e96-97ad-6e4f3ddc53cf,domain:D1-19BDAN,type:host
anti-affinity} ] } }
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6513) IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985049#comment-13985049 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6513: - Commit 7309146f9f3f57b7f7cad40945e11e34a6ff6fab in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7309146 ] CLOUDSTACK-6513: Optimize code by removing deprecated utility to QueryManagerImpl as private method just used for listTemplates and listAffinityGroups to avoid misuse by new list APIs. IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. Steps to reproduce the problem: As user1 , Create a private template and a public template. Grant access to the private template for user2 using updateTemplatePermissions. As user2 , list templates with templatefilter=shared. This returns both public and the the shared template. GET http://10.223.49.6/client/api?command=listTemplatespagesize=100page=1listAll=truetemplatefilter=sharedapiKey=SrgUY-U-nUl4qsOyn409kCjA2jC7dR5ReIV9SjdnmzLOn3c0Fm-vZbDSpkldUjuqLAXt5ShodtXYOgRB5NCnJQsignature=WBO8ll9nyjiB29aVq%2FpUsEQrthM%3D \n\n ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?listtemplatesresponse cloud-stack-version=4.4.0-SNAPSHOTcount6/counttemplateida2065bcc-7139-46b0-ac15-db7d3ff7dd75/idnamePublic_featured_d1a-TP7TPK/namedisplaytextpublic and feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateidce1635dc-1fcb-4f60-8d2f-d1129a3771ce/idnamePublic_not_featured_d2a-NPYFSN/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD2/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD2/domaindomainid18222e53-7221-4d6f-9a76-8f59869f24b2/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateid223e0c09-e18e-4188-9d8e-7ff2e2305547/idnamePrivate_featured_d1-E9PQHO/namedisplaytextprivate and featured Template/displaytextispublicfalse/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateida7b69a5e-4cb3-45fa-b3e7-dab3a6b73e45/idnamePublic_not_featured_d1a-XOCR05/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6513) IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985071#comment-13985071 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6513: - Commit 3af2f6d1418c66533067b5050d2fe3fd4200beb9 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=3af2f6d ] CLOUDSTACK-6513: templateFilter=shared should not show self-owned template. IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. Steps to reproduce the problem: As user1 , Create a private template and a public template. Grant access to the private template for user2 using updateTemplatePermissions. As user2 , list templates with templatefilter=shared. This returns both public and the the shared template. GET http://10.223.49.6/client/api?command=listTemplatespagesize=100page=1listAll=truetemplatefilter=sharedapiKey=SrgUY-U-nUl4qsOyn409kCjA2jC7dR5ReIV9SjdnmzLOn3c0Fm-vZbDSpkldUjuqLAXt5ShodtXYOgRB5NCnJQsignature=WBO8ll9nyjiB29aVq%2FpUsEQrthM%3D \n\n ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?listtemplatesresponse cloud-stack-version=4.4.0-SNAPSHOTcount6/counttemplateida2065bcc-7139-46b0-ac15-db7d3ff7dd75/idnamePublic_featured_d1a-TP7TPK/namedisplaytextpublic and feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateidce1635dc-1fcb-4f60-8d2f-d1129a3771ce/idnamePublic_not_featured_d2a-NPYFSN/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD2/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD2/domaindomainid18222e53-7221-4d6f-9a76-8f59869f24b2/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateid223e0c09-e18e-4188-9d8e-7ff2e2305547/idnamePrivate_featured_d1-E9PQHO/namedisplaytextprivate and featured Template/displaytextispublicfalse/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateida7b69a5e-4cb3-45fa-b3e7-dab3a6b73e45/idnamePublic_not_featured_d1a-XOCR05/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6389) test__01_nic requires advanced zone but it tagged as basic test case
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985270#comment-13985270 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6389: - Commit cfa783fef27f64ebdd42f66c59445cb37c9a9764 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-automation from [~santhoshe] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=cfa783f ] Added fix for CLOUDSTACK-6389 Added changes for CLOUDSTACK-6389. More details in the bug. Signed-off-by: Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com Signed-off-by: SrikanteswaraRao Talluri tall...@apache.org test__01_nic requires advanced zone but it tagged as basic test case Key: CLOUDSTACK-6389 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6389 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Test Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation Reporter: Chethan Krishnappa Assignee: Santhosh Kumar Edukulla test_nic.py which is under smoke tests is tagged as basic mode test but test runs only if the zone is advanced. if zone.networktype != 'Advanced': self.skipTest(Cannot run this test with a basic zone, please use advanced!) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6389) test__01_nic requires advanced zone but it tagged as basic test case
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985269#comment-13985269 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6389: - Commit cfa783fef27f64ebdd42f66c59445cb37c9a9764 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-automation from [~santhoshe] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=cfa783f ] Added fix for CLOUDSTACK-6389 Added changes for CLOUDSTACK-6389. More details in the bug. Signed-off-by: Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com Signed-off-by: SrikanteswaraRao Talluri tall...@apache.org test__01_nic requires advanced zone but it tagged as basic test case Key: CLOUDSTACK-6389 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6389 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Test Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation Reporter: Chethan Krishnappa Assignee: Santhosh Kumar Edukulla test_nic.py which is under smoke tests is tagged as basic mode test but test runs only if the zone is advanced. if zone.networktype != 'Advanced': self.skipTest(Cannot run this test with a basic zone, please use advanced!) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6389) test__01_nic requires advanced zone but it tagged as basic test case
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985273#comment-13985273 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6389: - Commit 6c9b21907c2600f320d2afc2fb7273fae73b7ba1 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~santhoshe] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=6c9b219 ] Added fix for CLOUDSTACK-6389 Added changes for CLOUDSTACK-6389. More details in the bug. Signed-off-by: Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com Signed-off-by: SrikanteswaraRao Talluri tall...@apache.org test__01_nic requires advanced zone but it tagged as basic test case Key: CLOUDSTACK-6389 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6389 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Test Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation Reporter: Chethan Krishnappa Assignee: Santhosh Kumar Edukulla test_nic.py which is under smoke tests is tagged as basic mode test but test runs only if the zone is advanced. if zone.networktype != 'Advanced': self.skipTest(Cannot run this test with a basic zone, please use advanced!) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6389) test__01_nic requires advanced zone but it tagged as basic test case
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985272#comment-13985272 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6389: - Commit 6c9b21907c2600f320d2afc2fb7273fae73b7ba1 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~santhoshe] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=6c9b219 ] Added fix for CLOUDSTACK-6389 Added changes for CLOUDSTACK-6389. More details in the bug. Signed-off-by: Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com Signed-off-by: SrikanteswaraRao Talluri tall...@apache.org test__01_nic requires advanced zone but it tagged as basic test case Key: CLOUDSTACK-6389 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6389 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Test Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation Reporter: Chethan Krishnappa Assignee: Santhosh Kumar Edukulla test_nic.py which is under smoke tests is tagged as basic mode test but test runs only if the zone is advanced. if zone.networktype != 'Advanced': self.skipTest(Cannot run this test with a basic zone, please use advanced!) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6512) IAM - Not able to list shared networks in the Vm deployment flow.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985281#comment-13985281 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6512: - Commit 2f35ef2f9ba5504d6bf0ee0c4e328f2f3c85b7fd in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=2f35ef2 ] CLOUDSTACK-6512:IAM - Not able to list shared networks in the Vm deployment flow. This commit is to revert ec5ee761d98c67c7da2ea70b623d4a9f3da966b5 to still use old logic for listNetworks to keep old behavior instead of new IAM model. IAM - Not able to list shared networks in the Vm deployment flow. - Key: CLOUDSTACK-6512 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6512 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4. Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Not able to list shared networks in the Vm deployment flow. Steps to reproduce the problem: Create a shared network that is domain specific / account specific. Log in as the account which should have access to this shared network. Using UI , try to deploy a VM using this shared network. shared network is not displayed in the list of networks. This is the call made by UI: http://10.223.49.6:8080/client/api?command=listNetworksresponse=jsonsessionkey=Enn1TgriYaANFQ%2BDKJR7T2Jc9l0%3DzoneId=fdd0ce43-41b8-49ef-9e59-70ead27bda4ccanusefordeploy=truedomainid=a59a0ce2-b5aa-4460-ade8-91d26e048bc4account=testD1_=1398446574911 When Networks are listed using the network tab , then we see the shared network being listed. Following API call without the domainid and account paramater is able to return the shared network. http://10.223.49.6:8080/client/api?command=listNetworksresponse=jsonsessionkey=Enn1TgriYaANFQ%2BDKJR7T2Jc9l0%3DlistAll=truepage=1pagesize=20_=1398446422647 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6533) IAM - Templates - Public templates do not have permissions to be used by ROOT group.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6533?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985283#comment-13985283 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6533: - Commit 504bd0377d8053a911f9823e06ce288af057446b in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=504bd03 ] CLOUDSTACK-6533: IAM - Templates - Public templates do not have permissions to be used by ROOT group. IAM - Templates - Public templates do not have permissions to be used by ROOT group. Key: CLOUDSTACK-6533 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6533 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Templates - Public templates do not have permissions to be used by ROOT group. As regular user create a public template. In iam_policy_permission policy we do not have permission for Admin group. mysql select * from iam_policy_permission where scope_id = 206; +--+---+---++--+--+-++---+-+-+ | id | policy_id | action| resource_type | scope_id | scope| access_type | permission | recursive | removed | created | +--+---+---++--+--+-++---+-+-+ | 4949 | 3 | listTemplates | VirtualMachineTemplate | 206 | RESOURCE | UseEntry| Allow | 0 | NULL| 2014-04-29 11:03:52 | | 4950 | 1 | listTemplates | VirtualMachineTemplate | 206 | RESOURCE | UseEntry| Allow | 0 | NULL| 2014-04-29 11:03:52 | mysql select * from vm_template where id=206; +-+--++--++--+--+-+--+-++-+-++--+-+-+---+-+--+-+-+-+-++--+--+-++--+-+--+ | id | unique_name | name | uuid | public | featured | type | hvm | bits | url | format | created | removed | account_id | checksum | display_text| enable_password | enable_sshkey | guest_os_id | bootable | prepopulate | cross_zones | extractable | hypervisor_type | source_template_id | template_tag | sort_key | size| state | update_count | updated | dynamically_scalable | +-+--++--++--+--+-+--+-++-+-++--+-+-+---+-+--+-+-+-+-++--+--+-++--+-+--+ | 206 | 206-318-179129bc-531f-31fe-a21d-23a8aa7b666f | Public_featured_d2a-G3GJQW | 265192c9-88d3-41d4-b435-6d3c3e5d256a | 1 | 1 | USER | 1 | 64 | http://10.223.110.232:/test.vhd | VHD| 2014-04-29 11:03:52 | NULL|318 | NULL | public and feature Template | 0 | 0 | 12 |1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Simulator | NULL | NULL |0 | 5242880 | Active |0 | NULL| 0 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6513) IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985282#comment-13985282 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6513: - Commit 4ca65496c2605eb2264d0acc7a43c2c539a3d9b0 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4ca6549 ] CLOUDSTACK-6513: IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. This commit reverts listTemplates behavior to 4.3 old logic without using consistent interpretation of list parameters adopted in new IAM model. IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. Steps to reproduce the problem: As user1 , Create a private template and a public template. Grant access to the private template for user2 using updateTemplatePermissions. As user2 , list templates with templatefilter=shared. This returns both public and the the shared template. GET http://10.223.49.6/client/api?command=listTemplatespagesize=100page=1listAll=truetemplatefilter=sharedapiKey=SrgUY-U-nUl4qsOyn409kCjA2jC7dR5ReIV9SjdnmzLOn3c0Fm-vZbDSpkldUjuqLAXt5ShodtXYOgRB5NCnJQsignature=WBO8ll9nyjiB29aVq%2FpUsEQrthM%3D \n\n ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?listtemplatesresponse cloud-stack-version=4.4.0-SNAPSHOTcount6/counttemplateida2065bcc-7139-46b0-ac15-db7d3ff7dd75/idnamePublic_featured_d1a-TP7TPK/namedisplaytextpublic and feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateidce1635dc-1fcb-4f60-8d2f-d1129a3771ce/idnamePublic_not_featured_d2a-NPYFSN/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD2/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD2/domaindomainid18222e53-7221-4d6f-9a76-8f59869f24b2/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateid223e0c09-e18e-4188-9d8e-7ff2e2305547/idnamePrivate_featured_d1-E9PQHO/namedisplaytextprivate and featured Template/displaytextispublicfalse/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateida7b69a5e-4cb3-45fa-b3e7-dab3a6b73e45/idnamePublic_not_featured_d1a-XOCR05/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6513) IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985285#comment-13985285 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6513: - Commit 683c242ed343c56483768849c97b0398e407605a in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=683c242 ] CLOUDSTACK-6513: Optimize code by removing deprecated utility to QueryManagerImpl as private method just used for listTemplates and listAffinityGroups to avoid misuse by new list APIs. IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. Steps to reproduce the problem: As user1 , Create a private template and a public template. Grant access to the private template for user2 using updateTemplatePermissions. As user2 , list templates with templatefilter=shared. This returns both public and the the shared template. GET http://10.223.49.6/client/api?command=listTemplatespagesize=100page=1listAll=truetemplatefilter=sharedapiKey=SrgUY-U-nUl4qsOyn409kCjA2jC7dR5ReIV9SjdnmzLOn3c0Fm-vZbDSpkldUjuqLAXt5ShodtXYOgRB5NCnJQsignature=WBO8ll9nyjiB29aVq%2FpUsEQrthM%3D \n\n ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?listtemplatesresponse cloud-stack-version=4.4.0-SNAPSHOTcount6/counttemplateida2065bcc-7139-46b0-ac15-db7d3ff7dd75/idnamePublic_featured_d1a-TP7TPK/namedisplaytextpublic and feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateidce1635dc-1fcb-4f60-8d2f-d1129a3771ce/idnamePublic_not_featured_d2a-NPYFSN/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD2/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD2/domaindomainid18222e53-7221-4d6f-9a76-8f59869f24b2/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateid223e0c09-e18e-4188-9d8e-7ff2e2305547/idnamePrivate_featured_d1-E9PQHO/namedisplaytextprivate and featured Template/displaytextispublicfalse/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateida7b69a5e-4cb3-45fa-b3e7-dab3a6b73e45/idnamePublic_not_featured_d1a-XOCR05/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6532) Affinity Groups - As admin user, not able to list all affinity groups available for regular users by passing account and domainId paramater.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985284#comment-13985284
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6532:
-
Commit 4f9b298817386d9eff8677e3c168f1dfdc7f6aeb in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4f9b298 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6532:Affinity Groups - As admin user, not able to list all
affinity groups available for regular users by passing account and
domainId paramater. This is to revert IAM way of implementing
listAffinityGroupsCmd, will bring it back when we have implemented real
impersonation.
Affinity Groups - As admin user, not able to list all affinity groups
available for regular users by passing account and domainId paramater.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6532
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6532
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Build from 4.4
Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0
Create an anti-affinity group as regular user.
As admin user, try to list all affinity groups available for regular users by
passing account and domainId parameter.
http://10.223.49.6:8080/client/api?command=listAffinityGroupsresponse=jsonsessionkey=okCw58hoD%2BrUSZ9NO5LKHz6ie9U%3D_=1398792364257account=testD1A-TestVMList-U27DEVdomainId=71dcc0ac-c230-4e96-97ad-6e4f3ddc53cf
No affinity group is listed.
As regular user:
{ listaffinitygroupsresponse : { count:1 ,affinitygroup : [
{id:bee9a7c5-3124-46b6-b258-893c8c9cc244,name:test-123,description:test-123,account:testD1A-TestVMList-U27DEV,domainid:71dcc0ac-c230-4e96-97ad-6e4f3ddc53cf,domain:D1-19BDAN,type:host
anti-affinity} ] } }
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6231) Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985437#comment-13985437
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6231:
-
Commit 2239eb4b173d1870af83174e646355be0e737c5c in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~dahn]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=2239eb4 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6231: network acl item cidrs loaded from a seperate table
Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
---
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Network Controller
Affects Versions: 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 4.4.0
Reporter: Daan Hoogland
Assignee: Daan Hoogland
Fix For: 4.4.0
[2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Creating acl on network SBP_VPC_MGT1_APP1:
10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.10/32,10.75.14.214/32,10.75.15.86/32,10.75.16.101/32,10.75.16.105/32,10.75.16.114/32,10.75.16.124/32,10.75.16.67/32,10.75.16.80/32,10.75.16.88/32,10.75.16.93/32,10.75.16.97/32,10.75.17.113/32,10.75.17.124/32,10.75.17.73/32,10.75.17.84/32,10.75.17.87/32,10.75.17.92/32,10.75.18.168/32,10.75.18.20/32,10.75.2.11/32,10.75.2.112/32,10.75.2.114/32,10.75.2.116/32,10.75.2.123/32,10.75.2.14/32,10.75.2.35/32,10.75.2.61/32,10.75.2.79/32,10.75.2.83/32,10.75.21.12/32,10.75.22.187/32,10.75.23.4/32,10.75.24.29/32,10.75.25.114/32,10.75.25.9/32,10.75.26.20/32,10.75.26.27/32,10.75.26.28/32,10.75.27.11/32,10.75.27.17/32,10.75.27.23/32,10.75.28.159/32,10.75.29.109/32,10.75.3.32/32,10.75.30.71/32,10.75.31.3/32,10.75.32.57/32,10.75.33.15/32,10.75.34.46/32,10.75.35.113/32,10.75.35.33/32,10.75.35.80/32,10.75.36.70/32,10.75.38.4/32,10.75.39.6/32,10.75.4.118/32,10.75.4.23/32,10.75.40.49/32,10.75.40.72/32,10.75.41.57/32,10.75.41.75/32,10.75.42.102/32,10.75.42.2/32,10.75.43.126/32,10.75.43.28/32,10.75.44.2/32,10.75.45.9/32,10.75.47.111/32,10.75.47.29/32,10.75.47.35/32,10.75.6.6/32,192.168.0.208/32,192.168.0.30/32
tcp 514/514 Ingress [2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:55+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:56+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:57+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:58+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:59+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:19:00+01:00] INFO: Job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1
done, result: {networkacl={id=5f226473-8798-4336-a68d-b38a3f7a41a0,
protocol=tcp, startport=514, endport=514,
traffictype=Ingress, state=Active,
cidrlist=10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.1,
tags=[], aclid=482f3740-7eda-11e3-aa74-005056b95463, number=93,
action=Allow}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6231) Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985438#comment-13985438
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6231:
-
Commit 3852afa717dc147ef9dc19d7b3801c341f321e77 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~dahn]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=3852afa ]
CLOUDSTACK-6231: network acl item cidrs loaded from a seperate table
Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
---
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Network Controller
Affects Versions: 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 4.4.0
Reporter: Daan Hoogland
Assignee: Daan Hoogland
Fix For: 4.4.0
[2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Creating acl on network SBP_VPC_MGT1_APP1:
10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.10/32,10.75.14.214/32,10.75.15.86/32,10.75.16.101/32,10.75.16.105/32,10.75.16.114/32,10.75.16.124/32,10.75.16.67/32,10.75.16.80/32,10.75.16.88/32,10.75.16.93/32,10.75.16.97/32,10.75.17.113/32,10.75.17.124/32,10.75.17.73/32,10.75.17.84/32,10.75.17.87/32,10.75.17.92/32,10.75.18.168/32,10.75.18.20/32,10.75.2.11/32,10.75.2.112/32,10.75.2.114/32,10.75.2.116/32,10.75.2.123/32,10.75.2.14/32,10.75.2.35/32,10.75.2.61/32,10.75.2.79/32,10.75.2.83/32,10.75.21.12/32,10.75.22.187/32,10.75.23.4/32,10.75.24.29/32,10.75.25.114/32,10.75.25.9/32,10.75.26.20/32,10.75.26.27/32,10.75.26.28/32,10.75.27.11/32,10.75.27.17/32,10.75.27.23/32,10.75.28.159/32,10.75.29.109/32,10.75.3.32/32,10.75.30.71/32,10.75.31.3/32,10.75.32.57/32,10.75.33.15/32,10.75.34.46/32,10.75.35.113/32,10.75.35.33/32,10.75.35.80/32,10.75.36.70/32,10.75.38.4/32,10.75.39.6/32,10.75.4.118/32,10.75.4.23/32,10.75.40.49/32,10.75.40.72/32,10.75.41.57/32,10.75.41.75/32,10.75.42.102/32,10.75.42.2/32,10.75.43.126/32,10.75.43.28/32,10.75.44.2/32,10.75.45.9/32,10.75.47.111/32,10.75.47.29/32,10.75.47.35/32,10.75.6.6/32,192.168.0.208/32,192.168.0.30/32
tcp 514/514 Ingress [2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:55+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:56+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:57+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:58+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:59+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:19:00+01:00] INFO: Job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1
done, result: {networkacl={id=5f226473-8798-4336-a68d-b38a3f7a41a0,
protocol=tcp, startport=514, endport=514,
traffictype=Ingress, state=Active,
cidrlist=10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.1,
tags=[], aclid=482f3740-7eda-11e3-aa74-005056b95463, number=93,
action=Allow}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6231) Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985511#comment-13985511
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6231:
-
Commit 6b0c34faeecad0e1c19181835130e7b91d2783ee in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~dahn]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=6b0c34f ]
CLOUDSTACK-6231: network acl item cidrs loaded from a seperate table
Conflicts:
setup/db/db/schema-430to440.sql
Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
---
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Network Controller
Affects Versions: 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 4.4.0
Reporter: Daan Hoogland
Assignee: Daan Hoogland
Fix For: 4.4.0
[2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Creating acl on network SBP_VPC_MGT1_APP1:
10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.10/32,10.75.14.214/32,10.75.15.86/32,10.75.16.101/32,10.75.16.105/32,10.75.16.114/32,10.75.16.124/32,10.75.16.67/32,10.75.16.80/32,10.75.16.88/32,10.75.16.93/32,10.75.16.97/32,10.75.17.113/32,10.75.17.124/32,10.75.17.73/32,10.75.17.84/32,10.75.17.87/32,10.75.17.92/32,10.75.18.168/32,10.75.18.20/32,10.75.2.11/32,10.75.2.112/32,10.75.2.114/32,10.75.2.116/32,10.75.2.123/32,10.75.2.14/32,10.75.2.35/32,10.75.2.61/32,10.75.2.79/32,10.75.2.83/32,10.75.21.12/32,10.75.22.187/32,10.75.23.4/32,10.75.24.29/32,10.75.25.114/32,10.75.25.9/32,10.75.26.20/32,10.75.26.27/32,10.75.26.28/32,10.75.27.11/32,10.75.27.17/32,10.75.27.23/32,10.75.28.159/32,10.75.29.109/32,10.75.3.32/32,10.75.30.71/32,10.75.31.3/32,10.75.32.57/32,10.75.33.15/32,10.75.34.46/32,10.75.35.113/32,10.75.35.33/32,10.75.35.80/32,10.75.36.70/32,10.75.38.4/32,10.75.39.6/32,10.75.4.118/32,10.75.4.23/32,10.75.40.49/32,10.75.40.72/32,10.75.41.57/32,10.75.41.75/32,10.75.42.102/32,10.75.42.2/32,10.75.43.126/32,10.75.43.28/32,10.75.44.2/32,10.75.45.9/32,10.75.47.111/32,10.75.47.29/32,10.75.47.35/32,10.75.6.6/32,192.168.0.208/32,192.168.0.30/32
tcp 514/514 Ingress [2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:55+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:56+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:57+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:58+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:59+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:19:00+01:00] INFO: Job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1
done, result: {networkacl={id=5f226473-8798-4336-a68d-b38a3f7a41a0,
protocol=tcp, startport=514, endport=514,
traffictype=Ingress, state=Active,
cidrlist=10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.1,
tags=[], aclid=482f3740-7eda-11e3-aa74-005056b95463, number=93,
action=Allow}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6513) IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985749#comment-13985749 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6513: - Commit 412793f9b41bb03eda2b8474f9f22a12b5097327 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=412793f ] CLOUDSTACK-6513: remove commented code. IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. Steps to reproduce the problem: As user1 , Create a private template and a public template. Grant access to the private template for user2 using updateTemplatePermissions. As user2 , list templates with templatefilter=shared. This returns both public and the the shared template. GET http://10.223.49.6/client/api?command=listTemplatespagesize=100page=1listAll=truetemplatefilter=sharedapiKey=SrgUY-U-nUl4qsOyn409kCjA2jC7dR5ReIV9SjdnmzLOn3c0Fm-vZbDSpkldUjuqLAXt5ShodtXYOgRB5NCnJQsignature=WBO8ll9nyjiB29aVq%2FpUsEQrthM%3D \n\n ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?listtemplatesresponse cloud-stack-version=4.4.0-SNAPSHOTcount6/counttemplateida2065bcc-7139-46b0-ac15-db7d3ff7dd75/idnamePublic_featured_d1a-TP7TPK/namedisplaytextpublic and feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateidce1635dc-1fcb-4f60-8d2f-d1129a3771ce/idnamePublic_not_featured_d2a-NPYFSN/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD2/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD2/domaindomainid18222e53-7221-4d6f-9a76-8f59869f24b2/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateid223e0c09-e18e-4188-9d8e-7ff2e2305547/idnamePrivate_featured_d1-E9PQHO/namedisplaytextprivate and featured Template/displaytextispublicfalse/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateida7b69a5e-4cb3-45fa-b3e7-dab3a6b73e45/idnamePublic_not_featured_d1a-XOCR05/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6502) IAMGroup.list and IAMPolicy.list in marvin base.py are not working.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13985775#comment-13985775 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6502: - Commit 42b803dd4b6e01107cbcf08d87f17c47934e8ae7 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=42b803d ] CLOUDSTACK-6502:Remove trailing whitespaces. IAMGroup.list and IAMPolicy.list in marvin base.py are not working. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6502 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6502 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Min Chen Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAMGroup.list and IAMPolicy.list in marvin base.py library have typo bugs, which blocks folks from writing IAM group and policy list related automation test. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6517) IAM - Admin is allowed to create PortFowarding rule for a regular user, when admin does not have UseEntry permission for IpAddress.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986401#comment-13986401 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6517: - Commit c32b7ab7c8e73a3422ff31d754c28c8997a9a84c in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~prachidamle] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=c32b7ab ] CLOUDSTACK-6517: IAM - Admin is allowed to create PortFowarding rule for a regular user, when admin does not have UseEntry permission for IpAddress. Changes: - IAM was applying ordering on accessTypes. Thus if an account had Operate, he got USe access as well. So even if IAM schema did not have 'UseEntry permission for IpAddress, some other 'OperateEntry' permission on IpAddress was letting this operation go through. - Fixed IAM to NOT do ordering of access types anymore. IAm will perform strict accessType check only. - This fix is needed so that admin does not get permission to USE resources from other account just becase he has OPERATE access on those resources due to some other APIs. - However due to this fix, we break backwards compatibilty with CS 4.3. - CS 4.3 allowed root admin to do the createPF operation for a user by passing in networkId of the user. - Same was the case for domain admins within their domains - Why this worked was due to CS 4.3 simply returning true for root admin/domain admin - So to maintain backwards compatibilty, we are adding the logic to return true for root admin and domain admin just like CS 4.3. - Exception is: For Network, AffinityGroup and Templates, we still call IAM even for root admin/domain admin, since thats what CS 4.3 did. Just for these 3 resource_types, it used to perform access checks even for root admin/domain admin. IAM - Admin is allowed to create PortFowarding rule for a regular user, when admin does not have UseEntry permission for IpAddress. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6517 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6517 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Prachi Damle Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Admin is allowed to create PortFowarding rule for a regular user, when admin does not have UseEntry permission for IpAddress. Steps to reproduce the problem: As regular user , on a network he owns , acquire an ip address. As admin , try to create a PF rule on this ip address without passing account and domainId. Creating PF rule succeeds. Since Admin has only ListEntry permission for IpAddress owned by other users , we expect this api call to fail. mysql select * from iam_policy_permission where resource_type = 'IpAddress' and policy_id=2; +--+---+---+---+--+-+--++---+-+-+ | id | policy_id | action| resource_type | scope_id | scope | access_type | permission | recursive | removed | created | +--+---+---+---+--+-+--++---+-+-+ | 1840 | 2 | listPublicIpAddresses | IpAddress | -1 | ALL | ListEntry| Allow | 0 | NULL| 2014-04-22 18:31:03 | | 1841 | 2 | listPublicIpAddresses | IpAddress | -1 | ACCOUNT | UseEntry | Allow | 0 | NULL| 2014-04-22 18:31:03 | Admin should be allowed to do this only , when he passes account and domainId of the regular user is passed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6549) 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986425#comment-13986425 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6549: - Commit 53ee9ae28e3a209a85c2c1febdd6f0979b3e911c in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~dahn] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=53ee9ae ] CLOUDSTACK-6549: ommission due to insufficient tests in CLOUDSTACK-6231 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start - Key: CLOUDSTACK-6549 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6549 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Prachi Damle Assignee: Daan Hoogland Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start Commit 3852afa717dc147ef9dc19d7b3801c341f321e77 that broke it. NetworkACLItemCidrsDao out of NetworkACLItemDao, but you forgot to add that into spring context xml file. You may need to add that into cloud-engine/schema/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-engine-schema-core-daos-context.xml. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6549) 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986428#comment-13986428 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6549: - Commit 9c2768756cde11181c2a4955e6c2d01fee62a7bb in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~dahn] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=9c27687 ] CLOUDSTACK-6549: ommission due to insufficient tests in CLOUDSTACK-6231 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start - Key: CLOUDSTACK-6549 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6549 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Prachi Damle Assignee: Daan Hoogland Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start Commit 3852afa717dc147ef9dc19d7b3801c341f321e77 that broke it. NetworkACLItemCidrsDao out of NetworkACLItemDao, but you forgot to add that into spring context xml file. You may need to add that into cloud-engine/schema/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-engine-schema-core-daos-context.xml. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6231) Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986427#comment-13986427
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6231:
-
Commit 53ee9ae28e3a209a85c2c1febdd6f0979b3e911c in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~dahn]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=53ee9ae ]
CLOUDSTACK-6549: ommission due to insufficient tests in CLOUDSTACK-6231
Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
---
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Network Controller
Affects Versions: 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 4.4.0
Reporter: Daan Hoogland
Assignee: Daan Hoogland
Fix For: 4.4.0
[2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Creating acl on network SBP_VPC_MGT1_APP1:
10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.10/32,10.75.14.214/32,10.75.15.86/32,10.75.16.101/32,10.75.16.105/32,10.75.16.114/32,10.75.16.124/32,10.75.16.67/32,10.75.16.80/32,10.75.16.88/32,10.75.16.93/32,10.75.16.97/32,10.75.17.113/32,10.75.17.124/32,10.75.17.73/32,10.75.17.84/32,10.75.17.87/32,10.75.17.92/32,10.75.18.168/32,10.75.18.20/32,10.75.2.11/32,10.75.2.112/32,10.75.2.114/32,10.75.2.116/32,10.75.2.123/32,10.75.2.14/32,10.75.2.35/32,10.75.2.61/32,10.75.2.79/32,10.75.2.83/32,10.75.21.12/32,10.75.22.187/32,10.75.23.4/32,10.75.24.29/32,10.75.25.114/32,10.75.25.9/32,10.75.26.20/32,10.75.26.27/32,10.75.26.28/32,10.75.27.11/32,10.75.27.17/32,10.75.27.23/32,10.75.28.159/32,10.75.29.109/32,10.75.3.32/32,10.75.30.71/32,10.75.31.3/32,10.75.32.57/32,10.75.33.15/32,10.75.34.46/32,10.75.35.113/32,10.75.35.33/32,10.75.35.80/32,10.75.36.70/32,10.75.38.4/32,10.75.39.6/32,10.75.4.118/32,10.75.4.23/32,10.75.40.49/32,10.75.40.72/32,10.75.41.57/32,10.75.41.75/32,10.75.42.102/32,10.75.42.2/32,10.75.43.126/32,10.75.43.28/32,10.75.44.2/32,10.75.45.9/32,10.75.47.111/32,10.75.47.29/32,10.75.47.35/32,10.75.6.6/32,192.168.0.208/32,192.168.0.30/32
tcp 514/514 Ingress [2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:55+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:56+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:57+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:58+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:59+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:19:00+01:00] INFO: Job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1
done, result: {networkacl={id=5f226473-8798-4336-a68d-b38a3f7a41a0,
protocol=tcp, startport=514, endport=514,
traffictype=Ingress, state=Active,
cidrlist=10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.1,
tags=[], aclid=482f3740-7eda-11e3-aa74-005056b95463, number=93,
action=Allow}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6231) Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986429#comment-13986429
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6231:
-
Commit 9c2768756cde11181c2a4955e6c2d01fee62a7bb in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~dahn]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=9c27687 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6549: ommission due to insufficient tests in CLOUDSTACK-6231
Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
---
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Network Controller
Affects Versions: 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 4.4.0
Reporter: Daan Hoogland
Assignee: Daan Hoogland
Fix For: 4.4.0
[2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Creating acl on network SBP_VPC_MGT1_APP1:
10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.10/32,10.75.14.214/32,10.75.15.86/32,10.75.16.101/32,10.75.16.105/32,10.75.16.114/32,10.75.16.124/32,10.75.16.67/32,10.75.16.80/32,10.75.16.88/32,10.75.16.93/32,10.75.16.97/32,10.75.17.113/32,10.75.17.124/32,10.75.17.73/32,10.75.17.84/32,10.75.17.87/32,10.75.17.92/32,10.75.18.168/32,10.75.18.20/32,10.75.2.11/32,10.75.2.112/32,10.75.2.114/32,10.75.2.116/32,10.75.2.123/32,10.75.2.14/32,10.75.2.35/32,10.75.2.61/32,10.75.2.79/32,10.75.2.83/32,10.75.21.12/32,10.75.22.187/32,10.75.23.4/32,10.75.24.29/32,10.75.25.114/32,10.75.25.9/32,10.75.26.20/32,10.75.26.27/32,10.75.26.28/32,10.75.27.11/32,10.75.27.17/32,10.75.27.23/32,10.75.28.159/32,10.75.29.109/32,10.75.3.32/32,10.75.30.71/32,10.75.31.3/32,10.75.32.57/32,10.75.33.15/32,10.75.34.46/32,10.75.35.113/32,10.75.35.33/32,10.75.35.80/32,10.75.36.70/32,10.75.38.4/32,10.75.39.6/32,10.75.4.118/32,10.75.4.23/32,10.75.40.49/32,10.75.40.72/32,10.75.41.57/32,10.75.41.75/32,10.75.42.102/32,10.75.42.2/32,10.75.43.126/32,10.75.43.28/32,10.75.44.2/32,10.75.45.9/32,10.75.47.111/32,10.75.47.29/32,10.75.47.35/32,10.75.6.6/32,192.168.0.208/32,192.168.0.30/32
tcp 514/514 Ingress [2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:55+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:56+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:57+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:58+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:59+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:19:00+01:00] INFO: Job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1
done, result: {networkacl={id=5f226473-8798-4336-a68d-b38a3f7a41a0,
protocol=tcp, startport=514, endport=514,
traffictype=Ingress, state=Active,
cidrlist=10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.1,
tags=[], aclid=482f3740-7eda-11e3-aa74-005056b95463, number=93,
action=Allow}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6549) 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986430#comment-13986430 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6549: - Commit ce56894d37ab60300a9193842704ae5a5a087ac8 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~dahn] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ce56894 ] CLOUDSTACK-6549: ommission due to insufficient tests in CLOUDSTACK-6231 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start - Key: CLOUDSTACK-6549 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6549 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Prachi Damle Assignee: Daan Hoogland Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 4.4-forward: Management Server fails to start Commit 3852afa717dc147ef9dc19d7b3801c341f321e77 that broke it. NetworkACLItemCidrsDao out of NetworkACLItemDao, but you forgot to add that into spring context xml file. You may need to add that into cloud-engine/schema/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-engine-schema-core-daos-context.xml. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6231) Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986431#comment-13986431
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6231:
-
Commit ce56894d37ab60300a9193842704ae5a5a087ac8 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~dahn]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ce56894 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6549: ommission due to insufficient tests in CLOUDSTACK-6231
Cloudstack createNetworkACL cuts cidrlist at 256 characters
---
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6231
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6231
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Network Controller
Affects Versions: 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 4.4.0
Reporter: Daan Hoogland
Assignee: Daan Hoogland
Fix For: 4.4.0
[2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Creating acl on network SBP_VPC_MGT1_APP1:
10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.10/32,10.75.14.214/32,10.75.15.86/32,10.75.16.101/32,10.75.16.105/32,10.75.16.114/32,10.75.16.124/32,10.75.16.67/32,10.75.16.80/32,10.75.16.88/32,10.75.16.93/32,10.75.16.97/32,10.75.17.113/32,10.75.17.124/32,10.75.17.73/32,10.75.17.84/32,10.75.17.87/32,10.75.17.92/32,10.75.18.168/32,10.75.18.20/32,10.75.2.11/32,10.75.2.112/32,10.75.2.114/32,10.75.2.116/32,10.75.2.123/32,10.75.2.14/32,10.75.2.35/32,10.75.2.61/32,10.75.2.79/32,10.75.2.83/32,10.75.21.12/32,10.75.22.187/32,10.75.23.4/32,10.75.24.29/32,10.75.25.114/32,10.75.25.9/32,10.75.26.20/32,10.75.26.27/32,10.75.26.28/32,10.75.27.11/32,10.75.27.17/32,10.75.27.23/32,10.75.28.159/32,10.75.29.109/32,10.75.3.32/32,10.75.30.71/32,10.75.31.3/32,10.75.32.57/32,10.75.33.15/32,10.75.34.46/32,10.75.35.113/32,10.75.35.33/32,10.75.35.80/32,10.75.36.70/32,10.75.38.4/32,10.75.39.6/32,10.75.4.118/32,10.75.4.23/32,10.75.40.49/32,10.75.40.72/32,10.75.41.57/32,10.75.41.75/32,10.75.42.102/32,10.75.42.2/32,10.75.43.126/32,10.75.43.28/32,10.75.44.2/32,10.75.45.9/32,10.75.47.111/32,10.75.47.29/32,10.75.47.35/32,10.75.6.6/32,192.168.0.208/32,192.168.0.30/32
tcp 514/514 Ingress [2014-03-11T11:18:54+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:55+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:56+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:57+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:18:58+01:00] INFO: Status of job
e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0 [2014-03-11T11:18:59+01:00] INFO:
Status of job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1 is 0
[2014-03-11T11:19:00+01:00] INFO: Job e71b6c83-a482-4765-9024-2ee9d146baa1
done, result: {networkacl={id=5f226473-8798-4336-a68d-b38a3f7a41a0,
protocol=tcp, startport=514, endport=514,
traffictype=Ingress, state=Active,
cidrlist=10.168.1.198/32,10.168.1.251/32,10.168.2.178/32,10.168.2.245/32,10.168.4.27/32,10.168.4.44/32,10.71.76.27/32,10.71.76.28/32,10.75.12.108/32,10.75.12.11/32,10.75.12.35/32,10.75.12.75/32,10.75.12.98/32,10.75.13.30/32,10.75.13.71/32,10.75.13.94/32,10.75.14.1,
tags=[], aclid=482f3740-7eda-11e3-aa74-005056b95463, number=93,
action=Allow}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6502) IAMGroup.list and IAMPolicy.list in marvin base.py are not working.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986453#comment-13986453 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6502: - Commit 62b210b58369a6f81ef1e40e81fee068c2deb6a9 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=62b210b ] CLOUDSTACK-6502:Remove trailing whitespaces. IAMGroup.list and IAMPolicy.list in marvin base.py are not working. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6502 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6502 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Min Chen Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAMGroup.list and IAMPolicy.list in marvin base.py library have typo bugs, which blocks folks from writing IAM group and policy list related automation test. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6443) [Automation] Two Test Cases failed on test_volumes.py - AttributeError: VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986777#comment-13986777
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6443:
-
Commit ef2616bfda1b37887312a93068937f5ecfaa36b4 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ef2616b ]
CLOUDSTACK-6443: [Automation] Two Test Cases failed on test_volumes.py
- AttributeError: VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'.
[Automation] Two Test Cases failed on test_volumes.py - AttributeError:
VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'
---
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6443
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6443
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Two Test Cases Failed:
test_07_resize_fail
test_08_resize_volume
*Error Message1*:
VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'
begin captured logging
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
STARTED : TC: test_07_resize_fail :::
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG: Fail
Resize Volume ID: b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
sending GET request: resizeVolume {'diskofferingid':
u'9015ab2c-1d88-4e39-bcd8-d7fa22a1b2ca', 'id': 'invalid id'}
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Computed Signature by Marvin: bCeC5im5Fgxi23vWk4lBzKbQm7A=
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.223.240.161
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=bCeC5im5Fgxi23vWk4lBzKbQm7A%3Ddiskofferingid=9015ab2c-1d88-4e39-bcd8-d7fa22a1b2caid=invalid+id
HTTP/1.1 431 330
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Request:
http://10.223.240.161:8080/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=bCeC5im5Fgxi23vWk4lBzKbQm7A%3Ddiskofferingid=9015ab2c-1d88-4e39-bcd8-d7fa22a1b2caid=invalid+id
Response: { resizevolumeresponse :
{uuidList:[],errorcode:431,cserrorcode:,errortext:Unable to
execute API command resizevolume due to invalid value. Invalid parameter id
value=invalid id due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist
or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class.} }
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
sending GET request: resizeVolume {'diskofferingid': 'invalid id', 'id':
u'b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249'}
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Computed Signature by Marvin: DbNaHKDzesuJcTU1thWGQg88UPk=
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.223.240.161
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=DbNaHKDzesuJcTU1thWGQg88UPk%3Ddiskofferingid=invalid+idid=b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249
HTTP/1.1 431 342
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Request:
http://10.223.240.161:8080/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=DbNaHKDzesuJcTU1thWGQg88UPk%3Ddiskofferingid=invalid+idid=b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249
Response: { resizevolumeresponse :
{uuidList:[],errorcode:431,cserrorcode:,errortext:Unable to
execute API command resizevolume due to invalid value. Invalid parameter
diskofferingid value=invalid id due to incorrect long value format, or entity
does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api
cmd class.} }
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
sending GET request: listVolumes {'virtualmachineid':
u'bca5f583-139f-46e4-87d5-09fb5adac313', 'type': 'ROOT', 'listall': True}
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Computed
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6556) [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986852#comment-13986852 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6556: - Commit 4415aee1e9f7b0b788ff1e0a6a7fe744fd37921f in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4415aee ] CLOUDSTACK-6556: [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk. [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk Key: CLOUDSTACK-6556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: KVM advanced zone Build - 4.4-forward Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-6556.rar This issue found with automation run, test case performing below steps Steps to reproduce Step 1 : Create advanced zone in KVM Step 2 : create an domain and account Step 3 : create network Step 4 : and deploy VM Deploy VM failing with below error 2014-05-01 10:19:04,211 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-22:ctx-610af2b6 ctx-a56ad5cc ctx-ea6be136) (userId=2 accountId=2 sessionId=null) 10.223.240.194 -- GET domainid=391ce37c-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8zoneid=21489cf5-d741-408d-8997-1b06b8263799apiKey=_Nc4QvLyqqdrC6VgxX5JExUaGRYG2kHOkmTru6_TGeyHj5CKP3DLpt5bNc-XKip0SpALarDOqlSjPOWRghzCkwserviceofferingid=c32c9894-bb49-45ac-90a6-57e9340a476edisplayname=Test+VMsignature=7Y24BWLxzYoj1%2Bc5vqLpQJ00O9A%3Dtemplateid=3922f730-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8response=jsonaccount=test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GOname=testvmcommand=deployVirtualMachinehypervisor=KVM 531 Acct[eedcbd60-08f6-45ee-b56d-a9979734914b-admin] does not have permission to access resource Ntwk[968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e|Guest|8] Network 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e already exist, mysql select * from networks where uuid=968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e\G; *** 1. row *** id: 579 name: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network uuid: 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e display_text: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network traffic_type: Guest broadcast_domain_type: Vlan broadcast_uri: NULL gateway: 10.1.1.1 cidr: 10.1.1.0/24 mode: Dhcp network_offering_id: 8 physical_network_id: 200 data_center_id: 1 guru_name: ExternalGuestNetworkGuru state: Destroy related: 579 domain_id: 1 account_id: 546 dns1: NULL dns2: NULL guru_data: NULL set_fields: 0 acl_type: Account network_domain: test.domain.org reservation_id: NULL guest_type: Isolated restart_required: 0 created: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 removed: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 specify_ip_ranges: 0 vpc_id: NULL ip6_gateway: NULL ip6_cidr: NULL network_cidr: NULL display_network: 1 network_acl_id: NULL streched_l2: 0 1 row in set (0.00 sec) ERROR: No query specified mysql select * from account where id=546; +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | id | account_name | uuid | type | domain_id | state | removed | cleanup_needed | network_domain | default_zone_id | default | +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | 546 | test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO | fcfd3a97-2f25-40e9-9a90-ded17c836678 |0 | 1 | enabled | 2014-05-01 17:19:04 | 0 | NULL |NULL | 0 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4549) ceph:deployvm from template created from snapshot is failing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986876#comment-13986876
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4549:
-
Commit 3962577329ea2561fe8dd9db1281e7a6a2ea62cf in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~widodh]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=3962577 ]
CLOUDSTACK-4549: Do not force RBD snapshot backups to RAW format
Since we use qemu-img to copy from RBD to Secondary Storage we no
longer have to force to RAW images, but can stick with QCOW2
When the snapshot backups are QCOW2 format they can easily be deployed
again when restoring from a backup
ceph:deployvm from template created from snapshot is failing
Key: CLOUDSTACK-4549
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4549
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.2.0
Reporter: sadhu suresh
Assignee: Wido den Hollander
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.rar
VM deployment form template which is created form snapshot is failing where
as VM deployment with uploaded template successful.
created template form snapshot is storing in raw
format(https://10-147-49-100.realhostip.com/userdata/0c826645-ec82-40f1-a1b0-38fc9ba1c76f.raw)..
not sure are we converting again to QCwo2
when we try to deploy a VM
steps:
1.create a ceph instance(configure compute offering with RBD and deploy a vm)
2.Once it successful,select the root partition and perform snapshot
3.once snapshot successful,create a template from snapshot
4 try to create vm uning above VM
actual result:
deploy vm failing with exception
-29 15:21:43,756 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Service
SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204
2013-08-29 15:21:43,762 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-14:job-42 =
[ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Applying userdata and password
entry in network Ntwk[204|Guest|8]
2013-08-29 15:21:43,800 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Seq
1-2089159931: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 7175246184473, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags:
100111,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.routing.SavePasswordCommand:{password:fnirq_cnffjbeq,vmIpAddress:10.1.1.140,vmName:6e798618-8e4d-4305-94a1-642e5f3aad08,executeInSequence:true,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:10.1.1.1,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.248,router.name:r-15-VM},wait:0}},{com.cloud.agent.api.routing.VmDataCommand:{vmIpAddress:10.1.1.140,vmName:6e798618-8e4d-4305-94a1-642e5f3aad08,executeInSequence:true,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:10.1.1.1,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.248,router.name:r-15-VM},wait:0}}]
}
2013-08-29 15:21:44,168 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) Seq 1-2089159931: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 7175246184473, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:true,wait:0}},{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2013-08-29 15:21:44,169 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) Seq 1-2089159931: No more commands found
2013-08-29 15:21:44,169 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Seq
1-2089159931: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7175246184473, via: 1, Ver: v1,
Flags: 110, { Answer, Answer } }
2013-08-29 15:21:44,179 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Service
SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204
2013-08-29 15:21:44,182 DEBUG [cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Checking
if we need to prepare 1 volumes for
VM[User|6e798618-8e4d-4305-94a1-642e5f3aad08]
2013-08-29 15:21:44,207 DEBUG [storage.image.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) template
202 is already in store:1, type:Image
2013-08-29 15:21:44,219 DEBUG [storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Not found
(templateId:202poolId:5) in template_spool_ref, persisting it
2013-08-29 15:21:44,234 DEBUG [storage.image.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) template
202 is already in store:5, type:Primary
2013-08-29 15:21:44,237 DEBUG
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4549) ceph:deployvm from template created from snapshot is failing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986877#comment-13986877
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4549:
-
Commit 355f1a2a7599f25771f390f7dba2f8659dbe8fa6 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~widodh]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=355f1a2 ]
CLOUDSTACK-4549: Do not force RBD snapshot backups to RAW format
Since we use qemu-img to copy from RBD to Secondary Storage we no
longer have to force to RAW images, but can stick with QCOW2
When the snapshot backups are QCOW2 format they can easily be deployed
again when restoring from a backup
Conflicts:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java
ceph:deployvm from template created from snapshot is failing
Key: CLOUDSTACK-4549
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4549
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.2.0
Reporter: sadhu suresh
Assignee: Wido den Hollander
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.rar
VM deployment form template which is created form snapshot is failing where
as VM deployment with uploaded template successful.
created template form snapshot is storing in raw
format(https://10-147-49-100.realhostip.com/userdata/0c826645-ec82-40f1-a1b0-38fc9ba1c76f.raw)..
not sure are we converting again to QCwo2
when we try to deploy a VM
steps:
1.create a ceph instance(configure compute offering with RBD and deploy a vm)
2.Once it successful,select the root partition and perform snapshot
3.once snapshot successful,create a template from snapshot
4 try to create vm uning above VM
actual result:
deploy vm failing with exception
-29 15:21:43,756 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Service
SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204
2013-08-29 15:21:43,762 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-14:job-42 =
[ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Applying userdata and password
entry in network Ntwk[204|Guest|8]
2013-08-29 15:21:43,800 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Seq
1-2089159931: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 7175246184473, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags:
100111,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.routing.SavePasswordCommand:{password:fnirq_cnffjbeq,vmIpAddress:10.1.1.140,vmName:6e798618-8e4d-4305-94a1-642e5f3aad08,executeInSequence:true,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:10.1.1.1,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.248,router.name:r-15-VM},wait:0}},{com.cloud.agent.api.routing.VmDataCommand:{vmIpAddress:10.1.1.140,vmName:6e798618-8e4d-4305-94a1-642e5f3aad08,executeInSequence:true,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:10.1.1.1,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.248,router.name:r-15-VM},wait:0}}]
}
2013-08-29 15:21:44,168 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) Seq 1-2089159931: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 7175246184473, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:true,wait:0}},{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2013-08-29 15:21:44,169 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) Seq 1-2089159931: No more commands found
2013-08-29 15:21:44,169 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Seq
1-2089159931: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7175246184473, via: 1, Ver: v1,
Flags: 110, { Answer, Answer } }
2013-08-29 15:21:44,179 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Service
SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204
2013-08-29 15:21:44,182 DEBUG [cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Checking
if we need to prepare 1 volumes for
VM[User|6e798618-8e4d-4305-94a1-642e5f3aad08]
2013-08-29 15:21:44,207 DEBUG [storage.image.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) template
202 is already in store:1, type:Image
2013-08-29 15:21:44,219 DEBUG [storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Not found
(templateId:202poolId:5) in template_spool_ref, persisting it
2013-08-29 15:21:44,234 DEBUG [storage.image.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6535) IAM:MS:API createVMSnapshot doesn't preserve access rights
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13986908#comment-13986908
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6535:
-
Commit f0edfc7ac5a8c3c22cea3e90a2a77835967234a2 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=f0edfc7 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6535: IAM:MS:API createVMSnapshot doesn't preserve access
rights.
IAM:MS:API createVMSnapshot doesn't preserve access rights
--
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6535
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6535
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: API, IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: 4.4
Reporter: Parth Jagirdar
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Critical
Attachments: apilog.log.bz2, db_dump.sql.bz2,
management-server.log.bz2
As domain Admin or as regular user; one can create a snapshot of a VM owned
by other users. (Create Snapshot succeeds across Domains as well).
Please refer to API and MS logs.
DB Dump is attached.
2014-04-29 15:32:38,316 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-19:ctx-baaf5fbe ctx-d89f1942) (userId=9
accountId=9 sessionId=13E9CF7AD4BB55EE9EDF2920D6E62915) 10.215.2.19 -- GET
command=createVMSnapshotvir
tualmachineid=219d649d-b6fc-475e-ab0f-8800a7f95235response=jsonsessionkey=p1pPn2KtylzYt92NSHuE2u4G68w%
3D 200 { createvmsnapshotresponse :
{id:8,jobid:fa37d77f-28b0-485b-af81-834a07ed6e4e} }
2014-04-29 15:32:40,306 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-25:ctx-114bb10a ctx-d396131c) (userId=2
accountId=2 sessionId=5EC896B528FB6DB972CE5B02A277047B) 10.215.2.19 -- GET
command=listVirtualMachines
response=jsonsessionkey=e1WRj6SbsZEClPvlCdLP9f3MhYI%3DlistAll=truepage=1pagesize=20_=1398810759989
200 { listvirtualmachinesresponse : { count:6 ,virtualmachine : [
{id:cea5fc51-6a31-4209-b26f-
9097c9d17011,name:d2-vm,displayname:d2-vm,account:d2,domainid:0af12b69-67f4-454a-9eb6-f2
bef02aba0b,domain:d2,created:2014-04-28T10:21:08-0700,state:Running,haenable:false,zonei
d:6933ac3e-29fe-4170-8411-b1827aa2f5cf,zonename:z,hostid:d8fb3cb9-782e-4cdc-b0c0-3adcf65a7a15
,hostname:10.223.58.68,templateid:549440c8-bf4b-11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,templatename:CentOS
5.
3(64-bit) no GUI (vSphere),templatedisplaytext:CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI
(vSphere),passwordenabled
:false,serviceofferingid:4c035b12-f32f-4c0c-b768-264ec02ac242,serviceofferingname:Small
Instance
,cpunumber:1,cpuspeed:500,memory:512,cpuused:45%,networkkbsread:0,networkkbswrite:0,gues
tosid:54a23660-bf4b-11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,rootdeviceid:0,rootdevicetype:ROOT,securitygroup:[
],nic:[{id:cae4f3d2-1598-4aa0-98b9-669a4c7de6ae,networkid:f417c31a-e19f-45db-9180-87f17a195bf0
,networkname:d2-net,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.1.1.1,ipaddress:10.1.1.151,isolati
onuri:vlan://2342,broadcasturi:vlan://2342,traffictype:Guest,type:Isolated,isdefault:tr
ue,macaddress:02:00:41:11:00:01}],hypervisor:VMware,publicipid:a6866b38-e8dd-4deb-965f-c09931
d183fe,publicip:10.223.138.11,instancename:i-10-32-VM,tags:[],affinitygroup:[],displayvm:
true,isdynamicallyscalable:false,ostypeid:12},
{id:e887d23a-fac0-4397-adb9-edfbf2169453,name:
d1-vm,displayname:d1-vm,account:d1,domainid:90a8c572-3f92-420b-9176-5daafa9853da,domain:
d1,created:2014-04-28T10:20:39-0700,state:Running,haenable:false,zoneid:6933ac3e-29fe-4170
-8411-b1827aa2f5cf,zonename:z,hostid:d8fb3cb9-782e-4cdc-b0c0-3adcf65a7a15,hostname:10.223.58
.68,templateid:549440c8-bf4b-11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,templatename:CentOS
5.3(64-bit) no GUI (vSph
ere),templatedisplaytext:CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI
(vSphere),passwordenabled:false,serviceofferi
ngid:4c035b12-f32f-4c0c-b768-264ec02ac242,serviceofferingname:Small
Instance,cpunumber:1,cpusp
eed:500,memory:512,cpuused:45%,networkkbsread:0,networkkbswrite:0,guestosid:54a23660-bf4b-
11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,rootdeviceid:0,rootdevicetype:ROOT,securitygroup:[],nic:[{id:5c410c
a5-5151-48d8-8de7-4fc674bd597a,networkid:2a7d1254-3120-42f5-b8b9-dd64485cfed4,networkname:d1-net
,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.1.1.1,ipaddress:10.1.1.184,isolationuri:vlan://2268,
mysql select * from iam_group_account_map where removed is NULL order by
group_id;
++--++-+-+
| id | group_id | account_id | removed | created |
++--++-+-+
| 43 |1 | 23 | NULL| 2014-04-14 23:18:40 |
| 45 |1 | 24 | NULL| 2014-04-17 22:23:41 |
| 41 |1 | 22 | NULL| 2014-04-14 23:18:24 |
| 39 |1 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6556) [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987057#comment-13987057 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6556: - Commit 6435b261deb0160f774a8815f0024e38f49d45e9 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=6435b26 ] CLOUDSTACK-6556: Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk. [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk Key: CLOUDSTACK-6556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: KVM advanced zone Build - 4.4-forward Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-6556.rar This issue found with automation run, test case performing below steps Steps to reproduce Step 1 : Create advanced zone in KVM Step 2 : create an domain and account Step 3 : create network Step 4 : and deploy VM Deploy VM failing with below error 2014-05-01 10:19:04,211 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-22:ctx-610af2b6 ctx-a56ad5cc ctx-ea6be136) (userId=2 accountId=2 sessionId=null) 10.223.240.194 -- GET domainid=391ce37c-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8zoneid=21489cf5-d741-408d-8997-1b06b8263799apiKey=_Nc4QvLyqqdrC6VgxX5JExUaGRYG2kHOkmTru6_TGeyHj5CKP3DLpt5bNc-XKip0SpALarDOqlSjPOWRghzCkwserviceofferingid=c32c9894-bb49-45ac-90a6-57e9340a476edisplayname=Test+VMsignature=7Y24BWLxzYoj1%2Bc5vqLpQJ00O9A%3Dtemplateid=3922f730-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8response=jsonaccount=test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GOname=testvmcommand=deployVirtualMachinehypervisor=KVM 531 Acct[eedcbd60-08f6-45ee-b56d-a9979734914b-admin] does not have permission to access resource Ntwk[968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e|Guest|8] Network 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e already exist, mysql select * from networks where uuid=968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e\G; *** 1. row *** id: 579 name: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network uuid: 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e display_text: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network traffic_type: Guest broadcast_domain_type: Vlan broadcast_uri: NULL gateway: 10.1.1.1 cidr: 10.1.1.0/24 mode: Dhcp network_offering_id: 8 physical_network_id: 200 data_center_id: 1 guru_name: ExternalGuestNetworkGuru state: Destroy related: 579 domain_id: 1 account_id: 546 dns1: NULL dns2: NULL guru_data: NULL set_fields: 0 acl_type: Account network_domain: test.domain.org reservation_id: NULL guest_type: Isolated restart_required: 0 created: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 removed: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 specify_ip_ranges: 0 vpc_id: NULL ip6_gateway: NULL ip6_cidr: NULL network_cidr: NULL display_network: 1 network_acl_id: NULL streched_l2: 0 1 row in set (0.00 sec) ERROR: No query specified mysql select * from account where id=546; +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | id | account_name | uuid | type | domain_id | state | removed | cleanup_needed | network_domain | default_zone_id | default | +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | 546 | test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO | fcfd3a97-2f25-40e9-9a90-ded17c836678 |0 | 1 | enabled | 2014-05-01 17:19:04 | 0 | NULL |NULL | 0 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6438) [Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested plugin could not be found.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987109#comment-13987109
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6438:
-
Commit 1ad532f57eee8358d74866e577669e2394d97c7d in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~bfederle]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=1ad532f ]
CLOUDSTACK-6438: WIP: If VM has additional IPs, keep showing in add screen
[Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested
plugin could not be found.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Basic Zone
XenServer
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Anthony Xu
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.log.2014-04-16.gz
The requested plugin could not be found.
2014-04-16 15:55:43,850 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:97, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 205, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.template.CreateTemplateCmdByAdmin,
cmdInfo:
{cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,ispublic:False,isextractable:False,httpmethod:GET,volumeid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,domainid:fe2a30b2-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,isfeatured:False,apiKey:MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Q,ostypeid:feba4b70-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,id:205,response:json,name:Cent
OS Template-7WLKMH,passwordenabled:False,displaytext:Cent OS
Template,account:test-TestCreateTemplate-SCKX71,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:291,signature:8ILr8Hdfhc35eHAm1D0L7lkgRw4\u003d},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 112957957439171, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-04-16 15:55:43,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b) ===START=== 10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,877 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) Received unknown parameters for
command createTemplate. Unknown parameters : isextractable account
2014-04-16 15:55:43,921 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b ctx-62916341 ctx-11cd890f) ===END===
10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,947 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) template 205 is already in store:1,
type:Image
2014-04-16 15:55:43,972 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type TEMPLATE
2014-04-16 15:55:44,005 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (API-Job-Executor-41:job-97
ctx-554395e3) Seq 2-7234469851417280562: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
112957957439171, via: 2(marron.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a,id:1,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:nfs1-ccp.citrix.com,path:/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://nfs1-ccp.citrix.com/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a}},name:ROOT-17,size:21474836480,path:01269023-5389-407f-8dfc-a3ab22074207,volumeId:19,vmName:i-12-17-QA,accountId:12,format:VHD,id:19,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/12/205,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,id:205,format:RAW,accountId:12,hvm:true,displayText:Cent
OS
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6438) [Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested plugin could not be found.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987110#comment-13987110
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6438:
-
Commit 9885cf4fb076d1236bc26b2346b84351f90efc7d in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~bfederle]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=9885cf4 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6438: WIP: Add filtering to check against existing IPs
[Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested
plugin could not be found.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Basic Zone
XenServer
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Anthony Xu
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.log.2014-04-16.gz
The requested plugin could not be found.
2014-04-16 15:55:43,850 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:97, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 205, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.template.CreateTemplateCmdByAdmin,
cmdInfo:
{cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,ispublic:False,isextractable:False,httpmethod:GET,volumeid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,domainid:fe2a30b2-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,isfeatured:False,apiKey:MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Q,ostypeid:feba4b70-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,id:205,response:json,name:Cent
OS Template-7WLKMH,passwordenabled:False,displaytext:Cent OS
Template,account:test-TestCreateTemplate-SCKX71,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:291,signature:8ILr8Hdfhc35eHAm1D0L7lkgRw4\u003d},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 112957957439171, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-04-16 15:55:43,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b) ===START=== 10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,877 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) Received unknown parameters for
command createTemplate. Unknown parameters : isextractable account
2014-04-16 15:55:43,921 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b ctx-62916341 ctx-11cd890f) ===END===
10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,947 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) template 205 is already in store:1,
type:Image
2014-04-16 15:55:43,972 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type TEMPLATE
2014-04-16 15:55:44,005 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (API-Job-Executor-41:job-97
ctx-554395e3) Seq 2-7234469851417280562: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
112957957439171, via: 2(marron.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a,id:1,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:nfs1-ccp.citrix.com,path:/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://nfs1-ccp.citrix.com/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a}},name:ROOT-17,size:21474836480,path:01269023-5389-407f-8dfc-a3ab22074207,volumeId:19,vmName:i-12-17-QA,accountId:12,format:VHD,id:19,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/12/205,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,id:205,format:RAW,accountId:12,hvm:true,displayText:Cent
OS
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6438) [Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested plugin could not be found.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987111#comment-13987111
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6438:
-
Commit 4f45c972c315d674e8a7fd669c5ea816057294b6 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~bfederle]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4f45c97 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6438: Filter out existing IPs in dropdown
[Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested
plugin could not be found.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Basic Zone
XenServer
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Anthony Xu
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.log.2014-04-16.gz
The requested plugin could not be found.
2014-04-16 15:55:43,850 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:97, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 205, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.template.CreateTemplateCmdByAdmin,
cmdInfo:
{cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,ispublic:False,isextractable:False,httpmethod:GET,volumeid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,domainid:fe2a30b2-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,isfeatured:False,apiKey:MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Q,ostypeid:feba4b70-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,id:205,response:json,name:Cent
OS Template-7WLKMH,passwordenabled:False,displaytext:Cent OS
Template,account:test-TestCreateTemplate-SCKX71,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:291,signature:8ILr8Hdfhc35eHAm1D0L7lkgRw4\u003d},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 112957957439171, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-04-16 15:55:43,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b) ===START=== 10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,877 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) Received unknown parameters for
command createTemplate. Unknown parameters : isextractable account
2014-04-16 15:55:43,921 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b ctx-62916341 ctx-11cd890f) ===END===
10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,947 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) template 205 is already in store:1,
type:Image
2014-04-16 15:55:43,972 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type TEMPLATE
2014-04-16 15:55:44,005 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (API-Job-Executor-41:job-97
ctx-554395e3) Seq 2-7234469851417280562: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
112957957439171, via: 2(marron.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a,id:1,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:nfs1-ccp.citrix.com,path:/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://nfs1-ccp.citrix.com/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a}},name:ROOT-17,size:21474836480,path:01269023-5389-407f-8dfc-a3ab22074207,volumeId:19,vmName:i-12-17-QA,accountId:12,format:VHD,id:19,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/12/205,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,id:205,format:RAW,accountId:12,hvm:true,displayText:Cent
OS
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6438) [Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested plugin could not be found.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987118#comment-13987118
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6438:
-
Commit 0b03609c45ecb5b4525e6a7b5216c70032d94a39 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~bfederle]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=0b03609 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6438: WIP: If VM has additional IPs, keep showing in add screen
[Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested
plugin could not be found.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Basic Zone
XenServer
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Anthony Xu
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.log.2014-04-16.gz
The requested plugin could not be found.
2014-04-16 15:55:43,850 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:97, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 205, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.template.CreateTemplateCmdByAdmin,
cmdInfo:
{cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,ispublic:False,isextractable:False,httpmethod:GET,volumeid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,domainid:fe2a30b2-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,isfeatured:False,apiKey:MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Q,ostypeid:feba4b70-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,id:205,response:json,name:Cent
OS Template-7WLKMH,passwordenabled:False,displaytext:Cent OS
Template,account:test-TestCreateTemplate-SCKX71,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:291,signature:8ILr8Hdfhc35eHAm1D0L7lkgRw4\u003d},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 112957957439171, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-04-16 15:55:43,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b) ===START=== 10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,877 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) Received unknown parameters for
command createTemplate. Unknown parameters : isextractable account
2014-04-16 15:55:43,921 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b ctx-62916341 ctx-11cd890f) ===END===
10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,947 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) template 205 is already in store:1,
type:Image
2014-04-16 15:55:43,972 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type TEMPLATE
2014-04-16 15:55:44,005 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (API-Job-Executor-41:job-97
ctx-554395e3) Seq 2-7234469851417280562: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
112957957439171, via: 2(marron.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a,id:1,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:nfs1-ccp.citrix.com,path:/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://nfs1-ccp.citrix.com/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a}},name:ROOT-17,size:21474836480,path:01269023-5389-407f-8dfc-a3ab22074207,volumeId:19,vmName:i-12-17-QA,accountId:12,format:VHD,id:19,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/12/205,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,id:205,format:RAW,accountId:12,hvm:true,displayText:Cent
OS
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6438) [Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested plugin could not be found.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987119#comment-13987119
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6438:
-
Commit 7daabf6515509dc276b968c6ca042cf964a328da in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~bfederle]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7daabf6 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6438: WIP: Add filtering to check against existing IPs
[Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested
plugin could not be found.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Basic Zone
XenServer
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Anthony Xu
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.log.2014-04-16.gz
The requested plugin could not be found.
2014-04-16 15:55:43,850 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:97, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 205, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.template.CreateTemplateCmdByAdmin,
cmdInfo:
{cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,ispublic:False,isextractable:False,httpmethod:GET,volumeid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,domainid:fe2a30b2-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,isfeatured:False,apiKey:MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Q,ostypeid:feba4b70-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,id:205,response:json,name:Cent
OS Template-7WLKMH,passwordenabled:False,displaytext:Cent OS
Template,account:test-TestCreateTemplate-SCKX71,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:291,signature:8ILr8Hdfhc35eHAm1D0L7lkgRw4\u003d},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 112957957439171, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-04-16 15:55:43,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b) ===START=== 10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,877 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) Received unknown parameters for
command createTemplate. Unknown parameters : isextractable account
2014-04-16 15:55:43,921 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b ctx-62916341 ctx-11cd890f) ===END===
10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,947 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) template 205 is already in store:1,
type:Image
2014-04-16 15:55:43,972 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type TEMPLATE
2014-04-16 15:55:44,005 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (API-Job-Executor-41:job-97
ctx-554395e3) Seq 2-7234469851417280562: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
112957957439171, via: 2(marron.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a,id:1,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:nfs1-ccp.citrix.com,path:/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://nfs1-ccp.citrix.com/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a}},name:ROOT-17,size:21474836480,path:01269023-5389-407f-8dfc-a3ab22074207,volumeId:19,vmName:i-12-17-QA,accountId:12,format:VHD,id:19,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/12/205,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,id:205,format:RAW,accountId:12,hvm:true,displayText:Cent
OS
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6438) [Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested plugin could not be found.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987121#comment-13987121
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6438:
-
Commit 430d14b67608039159403036dae3dc7af1e590f5 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~bfederle]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=430d14b ]
CLOUDSTACK-6438: Filter out existing IPs in dropdown
[Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested
plugin could not be found.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Basic Zone
XenServer
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Anthony Xu
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.log.2014-04-16.gz
The requested plugin could not be found.
2014-04-16 15:55:43,850 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:97, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 205, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.template.CreateTemplateCmdByAdmin,
cmdInfo:
{cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,ispublic:False,isextractable:False,httpmethod:GET,volumeid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,domainid:fe2a30b2-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,isfeatured:False,apiKey:MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Q,ostypeid:feba4b70-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,id:205,response:json,name:Cent
OS Template-7WLKMH,passwordenabled:False,displaytext:Cent OS
Template,account:test-TestCreateTemplate-SCKX71,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:291,signature:8ILr8Hdfhc35eHAm1D0L7lkgRw4\u003d},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 112957957439171, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-04-16 15:55:43,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b) ===START=== 10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,877 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) Received unknown parameters for
command createTemplate. Unknown parameters : isextractable account
2014-04-16 15:55:43,921 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b ctx-62916341 ctx-11cd890f) ===END===
10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,947 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) template 205 is already in store:1,
type:Image
2014-04-16 15:55:43,972 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type TEMPLATE
2014-04-16 15:55:44,005 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (API-Job-Executor-41:job-97
ctx-554395e3) Seq 2-7234469851417280562: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
112957957439171, via: 2(marron.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a,id:1,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:nfs1-ccp.citrix.com,path:/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://nfs1-ccp.citrix.com/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a}},name:ROOT-17,size:21474836480,path:01269023-5389-407f-8dfc-a3ab22074207,volumeId:19,vmName:i-12-17-QA,accountId:12,format:VHD,id:19,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/12/205,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,id:205,format:RAW,accountId:12,hvm:true,displayText:Cent
OS
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6556) [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987140#comment-13987140 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6556: - Commit 95e9db2f91451e7b88458baf5b599fc19e2c29b2 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=95e9db2 ] CLOUDSTACK-6556: [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk. [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk Key: CLOUDSTACK-6556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: KVM advanced zone Build - 4.4-forward Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-6556.rar This issue found with automation run, test case performing below steps Steps to reproduce Step 1 : Create advanced zone in KVM Step 2 : create an domain and account Step 3 : create network Step 4 : and deploy VM Deploy VM failing with below error 2014-05-01 10:19:04,211 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-22:ctx-610af2b6 ctx-a56ad5cc ctx-ea6be136) (userId=2 accountId=2 sessionId=null) 10.223.240.194 -- GET domainid=391ce37c-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8zoneid=21489cf5-d741-408d-8997-1b06b8263799apiKey=_Nc4QvLyqqdrC6VgxX5JExUaGRYG2kHOkmTru6_TGeyHj5CKP3DLpt5bNc-XKip0SpALarDOqlSjPOWRghzCkwserviceofferingid=c32c9894-bb49-45ac-90a6-57e9340a476edisplayname=Test+VMsignature=7Y24BWLxzYoj1%2Bc5vqLpQJ00O9A%3Dtemplateid=3922f730-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8response=jsonaccount=test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GOname=testvmcommand=deployVirtualMachinehypervisor=KVM 531 Acct[eedcbd60-08f6-45ee-b56d-a9979734914b-admin] does not have permission to access resource Ntwk[968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e|Guest|8] Network 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e already exist, mysql select * from networks where uuid=968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e\G; *** 1. row *** id: 579 name: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network uuid: 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e display_text: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network traffic_type: Guest broadcast_domain_type: Vlan broadcast_uri: NULL gateway: 10.1.1.1 cidr: 10.1.1.0/24 mode: Dhcp network_offering_id: 8 physical_network_id: 200 data_center_id: 1 guru_name: ExternalGuestNetworkGuru state: Destroy related: 579 domain_id: 1 account_id: 546 dns1: NULL dns2: NULL guru_data: NULL set_fields: 0 acl_type: Account network_domain: test.domain.org reservation_id: NULL guest_type: Isolated restart_required: 0 created: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 removed: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 specify_ip_ranges: 0 vpc_id: NULL ip6_gateway: NULL ip6_cidr: NULL network_cidr: NULL display_network: 1 network_acl_id: NULL streched_l2: 0 1 row in set (0.00 sec) ERROR: No query specified mysql select * from account where id=546; +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | id | account_name | uuid | type | domain_id | state | removed | cleanup_needed | network_domain | default_zone_id | default | +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | 546 | test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO | fcfd3a97-2f25-40e9-9a90-ded17c836678 |0 | 1 | enabled | 2014-05-01 17:19:04 | 0 | NULL |NULL | 0 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6535) IAM:MS:API createVMSnapshot doesn't preserve access rights
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987141#comment-13987141
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6535:
-
Commit d7c5382c58a87b68d356696349828ef44fdf80e2 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=d7c5382 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6535: IAM:MS:API createVMSnapshot doesn't preserve access
rights.
IAM:MS:API createVMSnapshot doesn't preserve access rights
--
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6535
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6535
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: API, IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: 4.4
Reporter: Parth Jagirdar
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Critical
Attachments: apilog.log.bz2, db_dump.sql.bz2,
management-server.log.bz2
As domain Admin or as regular user; one can create a snapshot of a VM owned
by other users. (Create Snapshot succeeds across Domains as well).
Please refer to API and MS logs.
DB Dump is attached.
2014-04-29 15:32:38,316 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-19:ctx-baaf5fbe ctx-d89f1942) (userId=9
accountId=9 sessionId=13E9CF7AD4BB55EE9EDF2920D6E62915) 10.215.2.19 -- GET
command=createVMSnapshotvir
tualmachineid=219d649d-b6fc-475e-ab0f-8800a7f95235response=jsonsessionkey=p1pPn2KtylzYt92NSHuE2u4G68w%
3D 200 { createvmsnapshotresponse :
{id:8,jobid:fa37d77f-28b0-485b-af81-834a07ed6e4e} }
2014-04-29 15:32:40,306 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-25:ctx-114bb10a ctx-d396131c) (userId=2
accountId=2 sessionId=5EC896B528FB6DB972CE5B02A277047B) 10.215.2.19 -- GET
command=listVirtualMachines
response=jsonsessionkey=e1WRj6SbsZEClPvlCdLP9f3MhYI%3DlistAll=truepage=1pagesize=20_=1398810759989
200 { listvirtualmachinesresponse : { count:6 ,virtualmachine : [
{id:cea5fc51-6a31-4209-b26f-
9097c9d17011,name:d2-vm,displayname:d2-vm,account:d2,domainid:0af12b69-67f4-454a-9eb6-f2
bef02aba0b,domain:d2,created:2014-04-28T10:21:08-0700,state:Running,haenable:false,zonei
d:6933ac3e-29fe-4170-8411-b1827aa2f5cf,zonename:z,hostid:d8fb3cb9-782e-4cdc-b0c0-3adcf65a7a15
,hostname:10.223.58.68,templateid:549440c8-bf4b-11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,templatename:CentOS
5.
3(64-bit) no GUI (vSphere),templatedisplaytext:CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI
(vSphere),passwordenabled
:false,serviceofferingid:4c035b12-f32f-4c0c-b768-264ec02ac242,serviceofferingname:Small
Instance
,cpunumber:1,cpuspeed:500,memory:512,cpuused:45%,networkkbsread:0,networkkbswrite:0,gues
tosid:54a23660-bf4b-11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,rootdeviceid:0,rootdevicetype:ROOT,securitygroup:[
],nic:[{id:cae4f3d2-1598-4aa0-98b9-669a4c7de6ae,networkid:f417c31a-e19f-45db-9180-87f17a195bf0
,networkname:d2-net,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.1.1.1,ipaddress:10.1.1.151,isolati
onuri:vlan://2342,broadcasturi:vlan://2342,traffictype:Guest,type:Isolated,isdefault:tr
ue,macaddress:02:00:41:11:00:01}],hypervisor:VMware,publicipid:a6866b38-e8dd-4deb-965f-c09931
d183fe,publicip:10.223.138.11,instancename:i-10-32-VM,tags:[],affinitygroup:[],displayvm:
true,isdynamicallyscalable:false,ostypeid:12},
{id:e887d23a-fac0-4397-adb9-edfbf2169453,name:
d1-vm,displayname:d1-vm,account:d1,domainid:90a8c572-3f92-420b-9176-5daafa9853da,domain:
d1,created:2014-04-28T10:20:39-0700,state:Running,haenable:false,zoneid:6933ac3e-29fe-4170
-8411-b1827aa2f5cf,zonename:z,hostid:d8fb3cb9-782e-4cdc-b0c0-3adcf65a7a15,hostname:10.223.58
.68,templateid:549440c8-bf4b-11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,templatename:CentOS
5.3(64-bit) no GUI (vSph
ere),templatedisplaytext:CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI
(vSphere),passwordenabled:false,serviceofferi
ngid:4c035b12-f32f-4c0c-b768-264ec02ac242,serviceofferingname:Small
Instance,cpunumber:1,cpusp
eed:500,memory:512,cpuused:45%,networkkbsread:0,networkkbswrite:0,guestosid:54a23660-bf4b-
11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,rootdeviceid:0,rootdevicetype:ROOT,securitygroup:[],nic:[{id:5c410c
a5-5151-48d8-8de7-4fc674bd597a,networkid:2a7d1254-3120-42f5-b8b9-dd64485cfed4,networkname:d1-net
,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.1.1.1,ipaddress:10.1.1.184,isolationuri:vlan://2268,
mysql select * from iam_group_account_map where removed is NULL order by
group_id;
++--++-+-+
| id | group_id | account_id | removed | created |
++--++-+-+
| 43 |1 | 23 | NULL| 2014-04-14 23:18:40 |
| 45 |1 | 24 | NULL| 2014-04-17 22:23:41 |
| 41 |1 | 22 | NULL| 2014-04-14 23:18:24 |
| 39 |1 | 21 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6556) [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987142#comment-13987142 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6556: - Commit 134a7998ce8eac7373532be2102e185fabefce0f in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=134a799 ] CLOUDSTACK-6556: Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk. [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk Key: CLOUDSTACK-6556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: KVM advanced zone Build - 4.4-forward Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-6556.rar This issue found with automation run, test case performing below steps Steps to reproduce Step 1 : Create advanced zone in KVM Step 2 : create an domain and account Step 3 : create network Step 4 : and deploy VM Deploy VM failing with below error 2014-05-01 10:19:04,211 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-22:ctx-610af2b6 ctx-a56ad5cc ctx-ea6be136) (userId=2 accountId=2 sessionId=null) 10.223.240.194 -- GET domainid=391ce37c-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8zoneid=21489cf5-d741-408d-8997-1b06b8263799apiKey=_Nc4QvLyqqdrC6VgxX5JExUaGRYG2kHOkmTru6_TGeyHj5CKP3DLpt5bNc-XKip0SpALarDOqlSjPOWRghzCkwserviceofferingid=c32c9894-bb49-45ac-90a6-57e9340a476edisplayname=Test+VMsignature=7Y24BWLxzYoj1%2Bc5vqLpQJ00O9A%3Dtemplateid=3922f730-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8response=jsonaccount=test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GOname=testvmcommand=deployVirtualMachinehypervisor=KVM 531 Acct[eedcbd60-08f6-45ee-b56d-a9979734914b-admin] does not have permission to access resource Ntwk[968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e|Guest|8] Network 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e already exist, mysql select * from networks where uuid=968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e\G; *** 1. row *** id: 579 name: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network uuid: 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e display_text: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network traffic_type: Guest broadcast_domain_type: Vlan broadcast_uri: NULL gateway: 10.1.1.1 cidr: 10.1.1.0/24 mode: Dhcp network_offering_id: 8 physical_network_id: 200 data_center_id: 1 guru_name: ExternalGuestNetworkGuru state: Destroy related: 579 domain_id: 1 account_id: 546 dns1: NULL dns2: NULL guru_data: NULL set_fields: 0 acl_type: Account network_domain: test.domain.org reservation_id: NULL guest_type: Isolated restart_required: 0 created: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 removed: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 specify_ip_ranges: 0 vpc_id: NULL ip6_gateway: NULL ip6_cidr: NULL network_cidr: NULL display_network: 1 network_acl_id: NULL streched_l2: 0 1 row in set (0.00 sec) ERROR: No query specified mysql select * from account where id=546; +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | id | account_name | uuid | type | domain_id | state | removed | cleanup_needed | network_domain | default_zone_id | default | +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | 546 | test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO | fcfd3a97-2f25-40e9-9a90-ded17c836678 |0 | 1 | enabled | 2014-05-01 17:19:04 | 0 | NULL |NULL | 0 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6443) [Automation] Two Test Cases failed on test_volumes.py - AttributeError: VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987139#comment-13987139
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6443:
-
Commit 09c9f8dfbd6a18fbb4672d7ff8bd651c110b0cb7 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=09c9f8d ]
CLOUDSTACK-6443: [Automation] Two Test Cases failed on test_volumes.py
- AttributeError: VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'.
[Automation] Two Test Cases failed on test_volumes.py - AttributeError:
VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'
---
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6443
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6443
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Two Test Cases Failed:
test_07_resize_fail
test_08_resize_volume
*Error Message1*:
VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'
begin captured logging
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
STARTED : TC: test_07_resize_fail :::
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG: Fail
Resize Volume ID: b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
sending GET request: resizeVolume {'diskofferingid':
u'9015ab2c-1d88-4e39-bcd8-d7fa22a1b2ca', 'id': 'invalid id'}
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Computed Signature by Marvin: bCeC5im5Fgxi23vWk4lBzKbQm7A=
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.223.240.161
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=bCeC5im5Fgxi23vWk4lBzKbQm7A%3Ddiskofferingid=9015ab2c-1d88-4e39-bcd8-d7fa22a1b2caid=invalid+id
HTTP/1.1 431 330
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Request:
http://10.223.240.161:8080/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=bCeC5im5Fgxi23vWk4lBzKbQm7A%3Ddiskofferingid=9015ab2c-1d88-4e39-bcd8-d7fa22a1b2caid=invalid+id
Response: { resizevolumeresponse :
{uuidList:[],errorcode:431,cserrorcode:,errortext:Unable to
execute API command resizevolume due to invalid value. Invalid parameter id
value=invalid id due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist
or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class.} }
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
sending GET request: resizeVolume {'diskofferingid': 'invalid id', 'id':
u'b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249'}
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Computed Signature by Marvin: DbNaHKDzesuJcTU1thWGQg88UPk=
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.223.240.161
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=DbNaHKDzesuJcTU1thWGQg88UPk%3Ddiskofferingid=invalid+idid=b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249
HTTP/1.1 431 342
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Request:
http://10.223.240.161:8080/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=DbNaHKDzesuJcTU1thWGQg88UPk%3Ddiskofferingid=invalid+idid=b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249
Response: { resizevolumeresponse :
{uuidList:[],errorcode:431,cserrorcode:,errortext:Unable to
execute API command resizevolume due to invalid value. Invalid parameter
diskofferingid value=invalid id due to incorrect long value format, or entity
does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api
cmd class.} }
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
sending GET request: listVolumes {'virtualmachineid':
u'bca5f583-139f-46e4-87d5-09fb5adac313', 'type': 'ROOT', 'listall': True}
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Computed
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6502) IAMGroup.list and IAMPolicy.list in marvin base.py are not working.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987138#comment-13987138 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6502: - Commit 1b78a1c87de42aa3d96e58c30e36fa7b5663da9d in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=1b78a1c ] CLOUDSTACK-6502:Remove trailing whitespaces. IAMGroup.list and IAMPolicy.list in marvin base.py are not working. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6502 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6502 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Min Chen Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAMGroup.list and IAMPolicy.list in marvin base.py library have typo bugs, which blocks folks from writing IAM group and policy list related automation test. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6558) IAM - Admin user is able to deploy VM in a regular user's Security Group.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987148#comment-13987148 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6558: - Commit e89c628843692c9e7046192f5b6d4893b7a45ec6 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~prachidamle] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=e89c628 ] CLOUDSTACK-6558 IAM - Admin user is able to deploy VM in a regular user's Security Group. Changes: - Even for SecurityGroup, go through IAM to do permission checks for all type of accounts IAM - Admin user is able to deploy VM in a regular user's Security Group. - Key: CLOUDSTACK-6558 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6558 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Prachi Damle Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Admin user is able to deploy VM in a regular user's Security Group. Steps to reproduce the problem: Basic Zone set up: As regular user , create a Security group. As admin , try to deploy a VM using this security group. Admin is allowed to deploy a VM using this security group. Expected Result: Admin should not be allowed to deploy a VM using regular user's security group. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6560) IAM - Admin user is denied permission to create Egress rule for a user's network
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987149#comment-13987149 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6560: - Commit 2e5b5291574417e31b4e81a6cc170e77a0cd7f65 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~prachidamle] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=2e5b529 ] CLOUDSTACK-6560: IAM - Admin user is denied permission to create Egress rule for a user's network Changes: - CS 4.3 handled Network entity in two ways: a) Specified UseNetwork access and did a strict check w.r.t who can use this network. Regular users and Domain Admin went through the strict check. Root admin got access always. b) Specified null access and that meant admins can access this network for the calling API that passes null access. - Fixing CS 4.4 IAM to handle this behavior: a) UseNetwork is mapped to UseEntry and IAM check will be done only for domain admin and regular users when this access is specified. Root Admin is grated access. b) If null access is specified, root and domain admin both are granted access. Regular users still go through IAM. IAM - Admin user is denied permission to create Egress rule for a user's network Key: CLOUDSTACK-6560 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6560 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Prachi Damle Assignee: Prachi Damle Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 Steps to reproduce: - Setup Advance Zone - Create a regular user - Login as the user and create an isolated network or deploy a VM that will create a network - Logout - Login as an Admin and list the user's network - Try to create Egress Firewall Rule on this network - Admin is denied permission -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6445) Simulator enhancements
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987622#comment-13987622 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6445: - Commit 82c082792ef0ec0a98604c7686f755adce511cc5 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~koushikd] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=82c0827 ] CLOUDSTACK-6445: Minor fixes in vm ha test Simulator enhancements -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6445 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6445 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Simulator Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Koushik Das Assignee: Koushik Das Fix For: 4.5.0 FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Simulator+enhancements -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6445) Simulator enhancements
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987621#comment-13987621 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6445: - Commit 362f89b9e1e93fc4e8d332d94ba8551e2db76977 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~koushikd] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=362f89b ] CLOUDSTACK-6445: Minor fixes in vm ha test Simulator enhancements -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6445 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6445 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Simulator Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Koushik Das Assignee: Koushik Das Fix For: 4.5.0 FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Simulator+enhancements -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4757) Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987638#comment-13987638 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4757: - Commit ad8033f9807ca06f36ee85750a697fa9b4f284c7 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/multiple-disk-ova from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ad8033f ] CLOUDSTACK-4757. Deploy Virtual Machine - If datadisk templates are specified using parameter 'datadisktemplatetodiskofferinglist', then create virtual machine with additional volumes attached Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-4757 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Reporter: Likitha Shetty Assignee: Likitha Shetty Fix For: 4.4.0 CloudStack volumes and templates are one single virtual disk in case of XenServer/XCP and KVM hypervisors since the files used for templates and volumes are virtual disks (VHD, QCOW2). However, VMware volumes and templates are in OVA format, which are archives that can contain a complete VM including multiple VMDKs and other files such as ISOs. And currently, Cloudstack only supports Template creation based on OVA files containing a single disk. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, only the first disk is attached to the new instance and other disks are ignored. Similarly with uploaded volumes, attaching an uploaded volume that contains multiple disks to a VM will result in only one VMDK to being attached to the VM. This behavior needs to be improved in VMWare to support OVA files with multiple disks for both uploaded volumes and templates. i.e. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, the first disk should be attached to the new instance as the ROOT disk and volumes should be created based on other VMDK disks in the OVA file and should be attached to the instance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4757) Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987642#comment-13987642 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4757: - Commit 3532ffe5af5553e558cfe6de2fef059b8d5e100e in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/multiple-disk-ova from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=3532ffe ] CLOUDSTACK-4757. Marvin test to verify support for OVA containing multiple disk Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-4757 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Reporter: Likitha Shetty Assignee: Likitha Shetty Fix For: 4.4.0 CloudStack volumes and templates are one single virtual disk in case of XenServer/XCP and KVM hypervisors since the files used for templates and volumes are virtual disks (VHD, QCOW2). However, VMware volumes and templates are in OVA format, which are archives that can contain a complete VM including multiple VMDKs and other files such as ISOs. And currently, Cloudstack only supports Template creation based on OVA files containing a single disk. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, only the first disk is attached to the new instance and other disks are ignored. Similarly with uploaded volumes, attaching an uploaded volume that contains multiple disks to a VM will result in only one VMDK to being attached to the VM. This behavior needs to be improved in VMWare to support OVA files with multiple disks for both uploaded volumes and templates. i.e. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, the first disk should be attached to the new instance as the ROOT disk and volumes should be created based on other VMDK disks in the OVA file and should be attached to the instance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4757) Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987639#comment-13987639 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4757: - Commit 07d514fb61d35710c55e67d269af70dde5bac85d in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/multiple-disk-ova from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=07d514f ] CLOUDSTACK-4757. Delete template - When delete is called on a template delete all datadisk templates that belong to the template Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-4757 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Reporter: Likitha Shetty Assignee: Likitha Shetty Fix For: 4.4.0 CloudStack volumes and templates are one single virtual disk in case of XenServer/XCP and KVM hypervisors since the files used for templates and volumes are virtual disks (VHD, QCOW2). However, VMware volumes and templates are in OVA format, which are archives that can contain a complete VM including multiple VMDKs and other files such as ISOs. And currently, Cloudstack only supports Template creation based on OVA files containing a single disk. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, only the first disk is attached to the new instance and other disks are ignored. Similarly with uploaded volumes, attaching an uploaded volume that contains multiple disks to a VM will result in only one VMDK to being attached to the VM. This behavior needs to be improved in VMWare to support OVA files with multiple disks for both uploaded volumes and templates. i.e. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, the first disk should be attached to the new instance as the ROOT disk and volumes should be created based on other VMDK disks in the OVA file and should be attached to the instance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4757) Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987641#comment-13987641 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4757: - Commit a6fd25ac3f6a4c382a9954360dd3afcdd27e1878 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/multiple-disk-ova from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a6fd25a ] CLOUDSTACK-4757. List templates - Add filter parent template id Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-4757 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Reporter: Likitha Shetty Assignee: Likitha Shetty Fix For: 4.4.0 CloudStack volumes and templates are one single virtual disk in case of XenServer/XCP and KVM hypervisors since the files used for templates and volumes are virtual disks (VHD, QCOW2). However, VMware volumes and templates are in OVA format, which are archives that can contain a complete VM including multiple VMDKs and other files such as ISOs. And currently, Cloudstack only supports Template creation based on OVA files containing a single disk. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, only the first disk is attached to the new instance and other disks are ignored. Similarly with uploaded volumes, attaching an uploaded volume that contains multiple disks to a VM will result in only one VMDK to being attached to the VM. This behavior needs to be improved in VMWare to support OVA files with multiple disks for both uploaded volumes and templates. i.e. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, the first disk should be attached to the new instance as the ROOT disk and volumes should be created based on other VMDK disks in the OVA file and should be attached to the instance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4757) Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987640#comment-13987640 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4757: - Commit 6a3844155d405e750af0d7b74d43ffcbb5b8e605 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/multiple-disk-ova from [~likithas] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=6a38441 ] CLOUDSTACK-4757. Template copy - Copy all Datadisk templates that belong to the template along with the template. Disallow individual copy of Datadisk templates Support OVA files with multiple disks for templates --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-4757 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4757 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Storage Controller Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Reporter: Likitha Shetty Assignee: Likitha Shetty Fix For: 4.4.0 CloudStack volumes and templates are one single virtual disk in case of XenServer/XCP and KVM hypervisors since the files used for templates and volumes are virtual disks (VHD, QCOW2). However, VMware volumes and templates are in OVA format, which are archives that can contain a complete VM including multiple VMDKs and other files such as ISOs. And currently, Cloudstack only supports Template creation based on OVA files containing a single disk. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, only the first disk is attached to the new instance and other disks are ignored. Similarly with uploaded volumes, attaching an uploaded volume that contains multiple disks to a VM will result in only one VMDK to being attached to the VM. This behavior needs to be improved in VMWare to support OVA files with multiple disks for both uploaded volumes and templates. i.e. If a user creates a template from a OVA file containing more than 1 disk and launches an instance using this template, the first disk should be attached to the new instance as the ROOT disk and volumes should be created based on other VMDK disks in the OVA file and should be attached to the instance. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6317) [VMware] Tagged VLAN support broken for Management/Control/Storage traffic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987656#comment-13987656
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6317:
-
Commit 5bc72ea25000456b4a479baac8f9e0690794c0d2 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~sateeshc]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=5bc72ea ]
CLOUDSTACK-6317 [VMware] Tagged VLAN support broken for
Management/Control/Storage traffic
Check if switch name detected from traffic label for management, storage,
control traffic is null before falling back to default value.
Signed-off-by: Sateesh Chodapuneedi sate...@apache.org
[VMware] Tagged VLAN support broken for Management/Control/Storage traffic
--
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6317
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6317
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: VMware
Affects Versions: 4.3.0, 4.4.0
Environment: VMware vCenter 5.1, ESXi 5.0 hosts
MS with ACS 4.3.0
Reporter: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Assignee: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0, 4.3.1
Prior to ACS 4.3.0 CloudStack used to support tagged VLAN for management /
storage / control traffic via traffic label, where admin would specify the
VLAN in comma separated string of vmware network traffic label. E.g.
vSwitch0,100 - This means management traffic would use standard vSwitch port
group tagged with VLAN 100 which sits on vSwitch0 existing on ESXi host.
This is functionality was broken since below commit in ACS 4.3 branch,
Commit 7c4831df9292115466fb9e01fcba952a5dad31c1 in branch refs/heads/4.3 from
Hugo Trippaers
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7c4831d ]
This commit overwrites the parsed vSwitch name, from traffic label, with
traffic label specified by admin resulting into below error during deployment
of SSVM (or any VM that needs management/storage traffic)
2014-04-01 08:23:19,866 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-9:ctx-862d86ff 10.102.192.3) VM v-2-VM will be started with NIC
device type: E1000
2014-04-01 08:23:19,866 INFO [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-9:ctx-862d86ff 10.102.192.3) Prepare NIC device based on NicTO:
{deviceId:0,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:07c38800-6da3-4596-b0ea-09047d45970e,mac:02:00:63:46:00:02,broadcastType:LinkLocal,type:Control,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:vSwitch0,100}
2014-04-01 08:23:21,150 ERROR [c.c.h.v.m.HypervisorHostHelper]
(DirectAgent-6:ctx-a6062e05 10.102.192.3) Unable to find vSwitchvSwitch0,100
2014-04-01 08:23:21,151 WARN [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-6:ctx-a6062e05 10.102.192.3) StartCommand failed due to
Exception: java.lang.Exception
Message: Unable to find vSwitchvSwitch0,100
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6317) [VMware] Tagged VLAN support broken for Management/Control/Storage traffic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987659#comment-13987659
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6317:
-
Commit ce7a689ae16f5a28b3ad9ff50a7bb19af31df4cf in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~sateeshc]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ce7a689 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6317 [VMware] Tagged VLAN support broken for
Management/Control/Storage traffic
Check if switch name detected from traffic label for management, storage,
control traffic is null before falling back to default value.
Signed-off-by: Sateesh Chodapuneedi sate...@apache.org
[VMware] Tagged VLAN support broken for Management/Control/Storage traffic
--
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6317
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6317
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: VMware
Affects Versions: 4.3.0, 4.4.0
Environment: VMware vCenter 5.1, ESXi 5.0 hosts
MS with ACS 4.3.0
Reporter: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Assignee: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0, 4.3.1
Prior to ACS 4.3.0 CloudStack used to support tagged VLAN for management /
storage / control traffic via traffic label, where admin would specify the
VLAN in comma separated string of vmware network traffic label. E.g.
vSwitch0,100 - This means management traffic would use standard vSwitch port
group tagged with VLAN 100 which sits on vSwitch0 existing on ESXi host.
This is functionality was broken since below commit in ACS 4.3 branch,
Commit 7c4831df9292115466fb9e01fcba952a5dad31c1 in branch refs/heads/4.3 from
Hugo Trippaers
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7c4831d ]
This commit overwrites the parsed vSwitch name, from traffic label, with
traffic label specified by admin resulting into below error during deployment
of SSVM (or any VM that needs management/storage traffic)
2014-04-01 08:23:19,866 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-9:ctx-862d86ff 10.102.192.3) VM v-2-VM will be started with NIC
device type: E1000
2014-04-01 08:23:19,866 INFO [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-9:ctx-862d86ff 10.102.192.3) Prepare NIC device based on NicTO:
{deviceId:0,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:07c38800-6da3-4596-b0ea-09047d45970e,mac:02:00:63:46:00:02,broadcastType:LinkLocal,type:Control,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:vSwitch0,100}
2014-04-01 08:23:21,150 ERROR [c.c.h.v.m.HypervisorHostHelper]
(DirectAgent-6:ctx-a6062e05 10.102.192.3) Unable to find vSwitchvSwitch0,100
2014-04-01 08:23:21,151 WARN [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-6:ctx-a6062e05 10.102.192.3) StartCommand failed due to
Exception: java.lang.Exception
Message: Unable to find vSwitchvSwitch0,100
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6564) OVS distributed routing: use file based OF rule updates
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987670#comment-13987670 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6564: - Commit d5374ed650aaa36d68ee16ca5e69c97e197f1b6e in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~murali.reddy] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=d5374ed ] CLOUDSTACK-6564: OVS distributed routing: use file based OF rule updates use ovs-ofctl replace flows by file name option to update the OF rules instead of sequenetially configuring the rules. OVS distributed routing: use file based OF rule updates --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6564 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6564 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Murali Reddy Assignee: Murali Reddy Fix For: 4.4.0 When, VpcPhysicalTopologyConfigCommand, OvsVpcRoutingPoli cyConfigCommand are sent by management server, scripts that populate the open flow rules to the bridge are configuring rules sequentially one after other. this no effective and probability error prone as well if a rule fails to program there is no revoking. To avoid such situation first create a file, that has all the updates and use the ovs-ofctl option to replace the bridge rules through the file. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6564) OVS distributed routing: use file based OF rule updates
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987673#comment-13987673 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6564: - Commit 9e98cbf1c1c5371e02f0325dba841532ddad116d in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~murali.reddy] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=9e98cbf ] CLOUDSTACK-6564: OVS distributed routing: use file based OF rule updates use ovs-ofctl replace flows by file name option to update the OF rules instead of sequenetially configuring the rules. OVS distributed routing: use file based OF rule updates --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6564 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6564 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Murali Reddy Assignee: Murali Reddy Fix For: 4.4.0 When, VpcPhysicalTopologyConfigCommand, OvsVpcRoutingPoli cyConfigCommand are sent by management server, scripts that populate the open flow rules to the bridge are configuring rules sequentially one after other. this no effective and probability error prone as well if a rule fails to program there is no revoking. To avoid such situation first create a file, that has all the updates and use the ovs-ofctl option to replace the bridge rules through the file. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6513) IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987890#comment-13987890 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6513: - Commit a3a0f13bb8f5a16c1660b26e3154a97e8a743c06 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a3a0f13 ] CLOUDSTACK-6513: remove commented code. IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. Steps to reproduce the problem: As user1 , Create a private template and a public template. Grant access to the private template for user2 using updateTemplatePermissions. As user2 , list templates with templatefilter=shared. This returns both public and the the shared template. GET http://10.223.49.6/client/api?command=listTemplatespagesize=100page=1listAll=truetemplatefilter=sharedapiKey=SrgUY-U-nUl4qsOyn409kCjA2jC7dR5ReIV9SjdnmzLOn3c0Fm-vZbDSpkldUjuqLAXt5ShodtXYOgRB5NCnJQsignature=WBO8ll9nyjiB29aVq%2FpUsEQrthM%3D \n\n ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?listtemplatesresponse cloud-stack-version=4.4.0-SNAPSHOTcount6/counttemplateida2065bcc-7139-46b0-ac15-db7d3ff7dd75/idnamePublic_featured_d1a-TP7TPK/namedisplaytextpublic and feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateidce1635dc-1fcb-4f60-8d2f-d1129a3771ce/idnamePublic_not_featured_d2a-NPYFSN/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD2/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD2/domaindomainid18222e53-7221-4d6f-9a76-8f59869f24b2/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateid223e0c09-e18e-4188-9d8e-7ff2e2305547/idnamePrivate_featured_d1-E9PQHO/namedisplaytextprivate and featured Template/displaytextispublicfalse/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateida7b69a5e-4cb3-45fa-b3e7-dab3a6b73e45/idnamePublic_not_featured_d1a-XOCR05/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6443) [Automation] Two Test Cases failed on test_volumes.py - AttributeError: VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987891#comment-13987891
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6443:
-
Commit 5132264309c91730debead4ef91c332991584642 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=5132264 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6443: [Automation] Two Test Cases failed on test_volumes.py
- AttributeError: VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'.
[Automation] Two Test Cases failed on test_volumes.py - AttributeError:
VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'
---
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6443
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6443
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Two Test Cases Failed:
test_07_resize_fail
test_08_resize_volume
*Error Message1*:
VirtualMachine instance has no attribute 'hostid'
begin captured logging
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
STARTED : TC: test_07_resize_fail :::
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG: Fail
Resize Volume ID: b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
sending GET request: resizeVolume {'diskofferingid':
u'9015ab2c-1d88-4e39-bcd8-d7fa22a1b2ca', 'id': 'invalid id'}
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Computed Signature by Marvin: bCeC5im5Fgxi23vWk4lBzKbQm7A=
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.223.240.161
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=bCeC5im5Fgxi23vWk4lBzKbQm7A%3Ddiskofferingid=9015ab2c-1d88-4e39-bcd8-d7fa22a1b2caid=invalid+id
HTTP/1.1 431 330
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Request:
http://10.223.240.161:8080/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=bCeC5im5Fgxi23vWk4lBzKbQm7A%3Ddiskofferingid=9015ab2c-1d88-4e39-bcd8-d7fa22a1b2caid=invalid+id
Response: { resizevolumeresponse :
{uuidList:[],errorcode:431,cserrorcode:,errortext:Unable to
execute API command resizevolume due to invalid value. Invalid parameter id
value=invalid id due to incorrect long value format, or entity does not exist
or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api cmd class.} }
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
sending GET request: resizeVolume {'diskofferingid': 'invalid id', 'id':
u'b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249'}
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Computed Signature by Marvin: DbNaHKDzesuJcTU1thWGQg88UPk=
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: INFO: Starting new HTTP connection
(1): 10.223.240.161
requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: DEBUG: GET
/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=DbNaHKDzesuJcTU1thWGQg88UPk%3Ddiskofferingid=invalid+idid=b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249
HTTP/1.1 431 342
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Request:
http://10.223.240.161:8080/client/api?apiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qresponse=jsoncommand=resizeVolumesignature=DbNaHKDzesuJcTU1thWGQg88UPk%3Ddiskofferingid=invalid+idid=b5521198-97f1-4f2c-afea-fcadf70d4249
Response: { resizevolumeresponse :
{uuidList:[],errorcode:431,cserrorcode:,errortext:Unable to
execute API command resizevolume due to invalid value. Invalid parameter
diskofferingid value=invalid id due to incorrect long value format, or entity
does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the field in api
cmd class.} }
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
sending GET request: listVolumes {'virtualmachineid':
u'bca5f583-139f-46e4-87d5-09fb5adac313', 'type': 'ROOT', 'listall': True}
test_07_resize_fail (integration.smoke.test_volumes.TestVolumes): DEBUG:
Computed
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6513) IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987889#comment-13987889 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6513: - Commit 554cab8ea13614f3cbe5349b161672fb8da2c416 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=554cab8 ] CLOUDSTACK-6513: templateFilter=shared should not show self-owned template. IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6513 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6513 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Templates - When templates are listed with templatefilter=shared is used , we see public templates also being included in the list. Steps to reproduce the problem: As user1 , Create a private template and a public template. Grant access to the private template for user2 using updateTemplatePermissions. As user2 , list templates with templatefilter=shared. This returns both public and the the shared template. GET http://10.223.49.6/client/api?command=listTemplatespagesize=100page=1listAll=truetemplatefilter=sharedapiKey=SrgUY-U-nUl4qsOyn409kCjA2jC7dR5ReIV9SjdnmzLOn3c0Fm-vZbDSpkldUjuqLAXt5ShodtXYOgRB5NCnJQsignature=WBO8ll9nyjiB29aVq%2FpUsEQrthM%3D \n\n ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?listtemplatesresponse cloud-stack-version=4.4.0-SNAPSHOTcount6/counttemplateida2065bcc-7139-46b0-ac15-db7d3ff7dd75/idnamePublic_featured_d1a-TP7TPK/namedisplaytextpublic and feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateidce1635dc-1fcb-4f60-8d2f-d1129a3771ce/idnamePublic_not_featured_d2a-NPYFSN/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD2/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD2/domaindomainid18222e53-7221-4d6f-9a76-8f59869f24b2/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateid223e0c09-e18e-4188-9d8e-7ff2e2305547/idnamePrivate_featured_d1-E9PQHO/namedisplaytextprivate and featured Template/displaytextispublicfalse/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:36-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedtrue/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3 (64-bit)/ostypenameaccounttesttemplateD1A/accountzoneid75d61334-ff70-49c3-99ed-3af702cd51d7/zoneidzonenameBLR1/zonenamesize5242880/sizetemplatetypeUSER/templatetypehypervisorSimulator/hypervisordomainD1/domaindomainid691ab662-6793-42a0-96e6-3b31a2c4e52d/domainidisextractabletrue/isextractablesshkeyenabledfalse/sshkeyenabledisdynamicallyscalablefalse/isdynamicallyscalable/templatetemplateida7b69a5e-4cb3-45fa-b3e7-dab3a6b73e45/idnamePublic_not_featured_d1a-XOCR05/namedisplaytextpublic and not feature Template/displaytextispublictrue/ispubliccreated2014-04-21T13:50:35-0400/createdisreadytrue/isreadypasswordenabledfalse/passwordenabledformatVHD/formatisfeaturedfalse/isfeaturedcrossZonesfalse/crossZonesostypeide5ebce64-c019-11e3-907f-4adf980f9414/ostypeidostypenameCentOS 5.3
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4549) ceph:deployvm from template created from snapshot is failing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987894#comment-13987894
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-4549:
-
Commit 1aff3a5f08f52573f0b50d5f016dc4e64a051079 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~widodh]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=1aff3a5 ]
CLOUDSTACK-4549: Do not force RBD snapshot backups to RAW format
Since we use qemu-img to copy from RBD to Secondary Storage we no
longer have to force to RAW images, but can stick with QCOW2
When the snapshot backups are QCOW2 format they can easily be deployed
again when restoring from a backup
Conflicts:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java
ceph:deployvm from template created from snapshot is failing
Key: CLOUDSTACK-4549
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4549
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.2.0
Reporter: sadhu suresh
Assignee: Wido den Hollander
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.rar
VM deployment form template which is created form snapshot is failing where
as VM deployment with uploaded template successful.
created template form snapshot is storing in raw
format(https://10-147-49-100.realhostip.com/userdata/0c826645-ec82-40f1-a1b0-38fc9ba1c76f.raw)..
not sure are we converting again to QCwo2
when we try to deploy a VM
steps:
1.create a ceph instance(configure compute offering with RBD and deploy a vm)
2.Once it successful,select the root partition and perform snapshot
3.once snapshot successful,create a template from snapshot
4 try to create vm uning above VM
actual result:
deploy vm failing with exception
-29 15:21:43,756 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Service
SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204
2013-08-29 15:21:43,762 DEBUG
[network.router.VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-14:job-42 =
[ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Applying userdata and password
entry in network Ntwk[204|Guest|8]
2013-08-29 15:21:43,800 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Seq
1-2089159931: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId: 7175246184473, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags:
100111,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.routing.SavePasswordCommand:{password:fnirq_cnffjbeq,vmIpAddress:10.1.1.140,vmName:6e798618-8e4d-4305-94a1-642e5f3aad08,executeInSequence:true,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:10.1.1.1,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.248,router.name:r-15-VM},wait:0}},{com.cloud.agent.api.routing.VmDataCommand:{vmIpAddress:10.1.1.140,vmName:6e798618-8e4d-4305-94a1-642e5f3aad08,executeInSequence:true,accessDetails:{router.guest.ip:10.1.1.1,zone.network.type:Advanced,router.ip:169.254.2.248,router.name:r-15-VM},wait:0}}]
}
2013-08-29 15:21:44,168 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) Seq 1-2089159931: Processing: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 7175246184473, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
[{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:true,wait:0}},{com.cloud.agent.api.Answer:{result:true,wait:0}}]
}
2013-08-29 15:21:44,169 DEBUG [agent.manager.AgentAttache]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) Seq 1-2089159931: No more commands found
2013-08-29 15:21:44,169 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Seq
1-2089159931: Received: { Ans: , MgmtId: 7175246184473, via: 1, Ver: v1,
Flags: 110, { Answer, Answer } }
2013-08-29 15:21:44,179 DEBUG [cloud.network.NetworkModelImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Service
SecurityGroup is not supported in the network id=204
2013-08-29 15:21:44,182 DEBUG [cloud.storage.VolumeManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Checking
if we need to prepare 1 volumes for
VM[User|6e798618-8e4d-4305-94a1-642e5f3aad08]
2013-08-29 15:21:44,207 DEBUG [storage.image.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) template
202 is already in store:1, type:Image
2013-08-29 15:21:44,219 DEBUG [storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ]) Not found
(templateId:202poolId:5) in template_spool_ref, persisting it
2013-08-29 15:21:44,234 DEBUG [storage.image.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(Job-Executor-14:job-42 = [ 3dcbbb22-d258-4859-bf3f-c8a620768e25 ])
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6558) IAM - Admin user is able to deploy VM in a regular user's Security Group.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987897#comment-13987897 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6558: - Commit 33c3752d0e08d29962762872da845b66b0c04339 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~prachidamle] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=33c3752 ] CLOUDSTACK-6558 IAM - Admin user is able to deploy VM in a regular user's Security Group. Changes: - Even for SecurityGroup, go through IAM to do permission checks for all type of accounts IAM - Admin user is able to deploy VM in a regular user's Security Group. - Key: CLOUDSTACK-6558 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6558 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: Build from 4.4 Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan Assignee: Prachi Damle Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 IAM - Admin user is able to deploy VM in a regular user's Security Group. Steps to reproduce the problem: Basic Zone set up: As regular user , create a Security group. As admin , try to deploy a VM using this security group. Admin is allowed to deploy a VM using this security group. Expected Result: Admin should not be allowed to deploy a VM using regular user's security group. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6560) IAM - Admin user is denied permission to create Egress rule for a user's network
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987898#comment-13987898 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6560: - Commit c4ab1d57727af9b81c26a32a09137c06017f in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~prachidamle] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=c4ab1d5 ] CLOUDSTACK-6560: IAM - Admin user is denied permission to create Egress rule for a user's network Changes: - CS 4.3 handled Network entity in two ways: a) Specified UseNetwork access and did a strict check w.r.t who can use this network. Regular users and Domain Admin went through the strict check. Root admin got access always. b) Specified null access and that meant admins can access this network for the calling API that passes null access. - Fixing CS 4.4 IAM to handle this behavior: a) UseNetwork is mapped to UseEntry and IAM check will be done only for domain admin and regular users when this access is specified. Root Admin is grated access. b) If null access is specified, root and domain admin both are granted access. Regular users still go through IAM. IAM - Admin user is denied permission to create Egress rule for a user's network Key: CLOUDSTACK-6560 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6560 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: IAM Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Prachi Damle Assignee: Prachi Damle Priority: Critical Fix For: 4.4.0 Steps to reproduce: - Setup Advance Zone - Create a regular user - Login as the user and create an isolated network or deploy a VM that will create a network - Logout - Login as an Admin and list the user's network - Try to create Egress Firewall Rule on this network - Admin is denied permission -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6556) [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987902#comment-13987902 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6556: - Commit 96cd858d97a06dde6f22d270363255706f1f2101 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=96cd858 ] CLOUDSTACK-6556: Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk. [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk Key: CLOUDSTACK-6556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: KVM advanced zone Build - 4.4-forward Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-6556.rar, management.rar This issue found with automation run, test case performing below steps Steps to reproduce Step 1 : Create advanced zone in KVM Step 2 : create an domain and account Step 3 : create network Step 4 : and deploy VM Deploy VM failing with below error 2014-05-01 10:19:04,211 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-22:ctx-610af2b6 ctx-a56ad5cc ctx-ea6be136) (userId=2 accountId=2 sessionId=null) 10.223.240.194 -- GET domainid=391ce37c-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8zoneid=21489cf5-d741-408d-8997-1b06b8263799apiKey=_Nc4QvLyqqdrC6VgxX5JExUaGRYG2kHOkmTru6_TGeyHj5CKP3DLpt5bNc-XKip0SpALarDOqlSjPOWRghzCkwserviceofferingid=c32c9894-bb49-45ac-90a6-57e9340a476edisplayname=Test+VMsignature=7Y24BWLxzYoj1%2Bc5vqLpQJ00O9A%3Dtemplateid=3922f730-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8response=jsonaccount=test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GOname=testvmcommand=deployVirtualMachinehypervisor=KVM 531 Acct[eedcbd60-08f6-45ee-b56d-a9979734914b-admin] does not have permission to access resource Ntwk[968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e|Guest|8] Network 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e already exist, mysql select * from networks where uuid=968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e\G; *** 1. row *** id: 579 name: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network uuid: 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e display_text: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network traffic_type: Guest broadcast_domain_type: Vlan broadcast_uri: NULL gateway: 10.1.1.1 cidr: 10.1.1.0/24 mode: Dhcp network_offering_id: 8 physical_network_id: 200 data_center_id: 1 guru_name: ExternalGuestNetworkGuru state: Destroy related: 579 domain_id: 1 account_id: 546 dns1: NULL dns2: NULL guru_data: NULL set_fields: 0 acl_type: Account network_domain: test.domain.org reservation_id: NULL guest_type: Isolated restart_required: 0 created: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 removed: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 specify_ip_ranges: 0 vpc_id: NULL ip6_gateway: NULL ip6_cidr: NULL network_cidr: NULL display_network: 1 network_acl_id: NULL streched_l2: 0 1 row in set (0.00 sec) ERROR: No query specified mysql select * from account where id=546; +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | id | account_name | uuid | type | domain_id | state | removed | cleanup_needed | network_domain | default_zone_id | default | +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | 546 | test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO | fcfd3a97-2f25-40e9-9a90-ded17c836678 |0 | 1 | enabled | 2014-05-01 17:19:04 | 0 | NULL |NULL | 0 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6556) [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987901#comment-13987901 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6556: - Commit 9f798823effac147a4d02adc350c940bff2ec9f5 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=9f79882 ] CLOUDSTACK-6556: [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk. [Automation] Deploy VM failing with error does not have permission to access resource Ntwk Key: CLOUDSTACK-6556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6556 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: KVM advanced zone Build - 4.4-forward Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Assignee: Min Chen Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 Attachments: CLOUDSTACK-6556.rar, management.rar This issue found with automation run, test case performing below steps Steps to reproduce Step 1 : Create advanced zone in KVM Step 2 : create an domain and account Step 3 : create network Step 4 : and deploy VM Deploy VM failing with below error 2014-05-01 10:19:04,211 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-22:ctx-610af2b6 ctx-a56ad5cc ctx-ea6be136) (userId=2 accountId=2 sessionId=null) 10.223.240.194 -- GET domainid=391ce37c-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8zoneid=21489cf5-d741-408d-8997-1b06b8263799apiKey=_Nc4QvLyqqdrC6VgxX5JExUaGRYG2kHOkmTru6_TGeyHj5CKP3DLpt5bNc-XKip0SpALarDOqlSjPOWRghzCkwserviceofferingid=c32c9894-bb49-45ac-90a6-57e9340a476edisplayname=Test+VMsignature=7Y24BWLxzYoj1%2Bc5vqLpQJ00O9A%3Dtemplateid=3922f730-d0e4-11e3-9a99-1a6f7bb0d0a8response=jsonaccount=test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GOname=testvmcommand=deployVirtualMachinehypervisor=KVM 531 Acct[eedcbd60-08f6-45ee-b56d-a9979734914b-admin] does not have permission to access resource Ntwk[968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e|Guest|8] Network 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e already exist, mysql select * from networks where uuid=968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e\G; *** 1. row *** id: 579 name: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network uuid: 968f35d1-62b2-448c-835d-1bf688c2d99e display_text: test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO-network traffic_type: Guest broadcast_domain_type: Vlan broadcast_uri: NULL gateway: 10.1.1.1 cidr: 10.1.1.0/24 mode: Dhcp network_offering_id: 8 physical_network_id: 200 data_center_id: 1 guru_name: ExternalGuestNetworkGuru state: Destroy related: 579 domain_id: 1 account_id: 546 dns1: NULL dns2: NULL guru_data: NULL set_fields: 0 acl_type: Account network_domain: test.domain.org reservation_id: NULL guest_type: Isolated restart_required: 0 created: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 removed: 2014-05-01 17:19:04 specify_ip_ranges: 0 vpc_id: NULL ip6_gateway: NULL ip6_cidr: NULL network_cidr: NULL display_network: 1 network_acl_id: NULL streched_l2: 0 1 row in set (0.00 sec) ERROR: No query specified mysql select * from account where id=546; +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | id | account_name | uuid | type | domain_id | state | removed | cleanup_needed | network_domain | default_zone_id | default | +-+--+--+--+---+-+-+++-+-+ | 546 | test-TestDeployVM-test_deploy_vm_multiple-LDX2GO | fcfd3a97-2f25-40e9-9a90-ded17c836678 |0 | 1 | enabled | 2014-05-01 17:19:04 | 0 | NULL |NULL | 0 |
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6535) IAM:MS:API createVMSnapshot doesn't preserve access rights
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987900#comment-13987900
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6535:
-
Commit 4ebde8351924ec14bab8fb9dae59c238ebbcd440 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4ebde83 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6535: IAM:MS:API createVMSnapshot doesn't preserve access
rights.
IAM:MS:API createVMSnapshot doesn't preserve access rights
--
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6535
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6535
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: API, IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: 4.4
Reporter: Parth Jagirdar
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Critical
Attachments: apilog.log.bz2, db_dump.sql.bz2,
management-server.log.bz2
As domain Admin or as regular user; one can create a snapshot of a VM owned
by other users. (Create Snapshot succeeds across Domains as well).
Please refer to API and MS logs.
DB Dump is attached.
2014-04-29 15:32:38,316 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-19:ctx-baaf5fbe ctx-d89f1942) (userId=9
accountId=9 sessionId=13E9CF7AD4BB55EE9EDF2920D6E62915) 10.215.2.19 -- GET
command=createVMSnapshotvir
tualmachineid=219d649d-b6fc-475e-ab0f-8800a7f95235response=jsonsessionkey=p1pPn2KtylzYt92NSHuE2u4G68w%
3D 200 { createvmsnapshotresponse :
{id:8,jobid:fa37d77f-28b0-485b-af81-834a07ed6e4e} }
2014-04-29 15:32:40,306 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-25:ctx-114bb10a ctx-d396131c) (userId=2
accountId=2 sessionId=5EC896B528FB6DB972CE5B02A277047B) 10.215.2.19 -- GET
command=listVirtualMachines
response=jsonsessionkey=e1WRj6SbsZEClPvlCdLP9f3MhYI%3DlistAll=truepage=1pagesize=20_=1398810759989
200 { listvirtualmachinesresponse : { count:6 ,virtualmachine : [
{id:cea5fc51-6a31-4209-b26f-
9097c9d17011,name:d2-vm,displayname:d2-vm,account:d2,domainid:0af12b69-67f4-454a-9eb6-f2
bef02aba0b,domain:d2,created:2014-04-28T10:21:08-0700,state:Running,haenable:false,zonei
d:6933ac3e-29fe-4170-8411-b1827aa2f5cf,zonename:z,hostid:d8fb3cb9-782e-4cdc-b0c0-3adcf65a7a15
,hostname:10.223.58.68,templateid:549440c8-bf4b-11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,templatename:CentOS
5.
3(64-bit) no GUI (vSphere),templatedisplaytext:CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI
(vSphere),passwordenabled
:false,serviceofferingid:4c035b12-f32f-4c0c-b768-264ec02ac242,serviceofferingname:Small
Instance
,cpunumber:1,cpuspeed:500,memory:512,cpuused:45%,networkkbsread:0,networkkbswrite:0,gues
tosid:54a23660-bf4b-11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,rootdeviceid:0,rootdevicetype:ROOT,securitygroup:[
],nic:[{id:cae4f3d2-1598-4aa0-98b9-669a4c7de6ae,networkid:f417c31a-e19f-45db-9180-87f17a195bf0
,networkname:d2-net,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.1.1.1,ipaddress:10.1.1.151,isolati
onuri:vlan://2342,broadcasturi:vlan://2342,traffictype:Guest,type:Isolated,isdefault:tr
ue,macaddress:02:00:41:11:00:01}],hypervisor:VMware,publicipid:a6866b38-e8dd-4deb-965f-c09931
d183fe,publicip:10.223.138.11,instancename:i-10-32-VM,tags:[],affinitygroup:[],displayvm:
true,isdynamicallyscalable:false,ostypeid:12},
{id:e887d23a-fac0-4397-adb9-edfbf2169453,name:
d1-vm,displayname:d1-vm,account:d1,domainid:90a8c572-3f92-420b-9176-5daafa9853da,domain:
d1,created:2014-04-28T10:20:39-0700,state:Running,haenable:false,zoneid:6933ac3e-29fe-4170
-8411-b1827aa2f5cf,zonename:z,hostid:d8fb3cb9-782e-4cdc-b0c0-3adcf65a7a15,hostname:10.223.58
.68,templateid:549440c8-bf4b-11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,templatename:CentOS
5.3(64-bit) no GUI (vSph
ere),templatedisplaytext:CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI
(vSphere),passwordenabled:false,serviceofferi
ngid:4c035b12-f32f-4c0c-b768-264ec02ac242,serviceofferingname:Small
Instance,cpunumber:1,cpusp
eed:500,memory:512,cpuused:45%,networkkbsread:0,networkkbswrite:0,guestosid:54a23660-bf4b-
11e3-a56d-ced18bec4952,rootdeviceid:0,rootdevicetype:ROOT,securitygroup:[],nic:[{id:5c410c
a5-5151-48d8-8de7-4fc674bd597a,networkid:2a7d1254-3120-42f5-b8b9-dd64485cfed4,networkname:d1-net
,netmask:255.255.255.0,gateway:10.1.1.1,ipaddress:10.1.1.184,isolationuri:vlan://2268,
mysql select * from iam_group_account_map where removed is NULL order by
group_id;
++--++-+-+
| id | group_id | account_id | removed | created |
++--++-+-+
| 43 |1 | 23 | NULL| 2014-04-14 23:18:40 |
| 45 |1 | 24 | NULL| 2014-04-17 22:23:41 |
| 41 |1 | 22 | NULL| 2014-04-14 23:18:24 |
| 39 |1 | 21 | NULL
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6317) [VMware] Tagged VLAN support broken for Management/Control/Storage traffic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987912#comment-13987912
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6317:
-
Commit 47f5d2862ac827a3722680fe4f8f1f576776f81b in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~sateeshc]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=47f5d28 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6317 [VMware] Tagged VLAN support broken for
Management/Control/Storage traffic
Check if switch name detected from traffic label for management, storage,
control traffic is null before falling back to default value.
Signed-off-by: Sateesh Chodapuneedi sate...@apache.org
[VMware] Tagged VLAN support broken for Management/Control/Storage traffic
--
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6317
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6317
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: VMware
Affects Versions: 4.3.0, 4.4.0
Environment: VMware vCenter 5.1, ESXi 5.0 hosts
MS with ACS 4.3.0
Reporter: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Assignee: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0, 4.3.1
Prior to ACS 4.3.0 CloudStack used to support tagged VLAN for management /
storage / control traffic via traffic label, where admin would specify the
VLAN in comma separated string of vmware network traffic label. E.g.
vSwitch0,100 - This means management traffic would use standard vSwitch port
group tagged with VLAN 100 which sits on vSwitch0 existing on ESXi host.
This is functionality was broken since below commit in ACS 4.3 branch,
Commit 7c4831df9292115466fb9e01fcba952a5dad31c1 in branch refs/heads/4.3 from
Hugo Trippaers
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7c4831d ]
This commit overwrites the parsed vSwitch name, from traffic label, with
traffic label specified by admin resulting into below error during deployment
of SSVM (or any VM that needs management/storage traffic)
2014-04-01 08:23:19,866 DEBUG [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-9:ctx-862d86ff 10.102.192.3) VM v-2-VM will be started with NIC
device type: E1000
2014-04-01 08:23:19,866 INFO [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-9:ctx-862d86ff 10.102.192.3) Prepare NIC device based on NicTO:
{deviceId:0,networkRateMbps:-1,defaultNic:false,uuid:07c38800-6da3-4596-b0ea-09047d45970e,mac:02:00:63:46:00:02,broadcastType:LinkLocal,type:Control,isSecurityGroupEnabled:false,name:vSwitch0,100}
2014-04-01 08:23:21,150 ERROR [c.c.h.v.m.HypervisorHostHelper]
(DirectAgent-6:ctx-a6062e05 10.102.192.3) Unable to find vSwitchvSwitch0,100
2014-04-01 08:23:21,151 WARN [c.c.h.v.r.VmwareResource]
(DirectAgent-6:ctx-a6062e05 10.102.192.3) StartCommand failed due to
Exception: java.lang.Exception
Message: Unable to find vSwitchvSwitch0,100
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6564) OVS distributed routing: use file based OF rule updates
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987915#comment-13987915 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6564: - Commit dd88720c9b48d49f5623126a12bb5390e4b01c1e in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~murali.reddy] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=dd88720 ] CLOUDSTACK-6564: OVS distributed routing: use file based OF rule updates use ovs-ofctl replace flows by file name option to update the OF rules instead of sequenetially configuring the rules. OVS distributed routing: use file based OF rule updates --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6564 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6564 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Murali Reddy Assignee: Murali Reddy Fix For: 4.4.0 When, VpcPhysicalTopologyConfigCommand, OvsVpcRoutingPoli cyConfigCommand are sent by management server, scripts that populate the open flow rules to the bridge are configuring rules sequentially one after other. this no effective and probability error prone as well if a rule fails to program there is no revoking. To avoid such situation first create a file, that has all the updates and use the ovs-ofctl option to replace the bridge rules through the file. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6257) Private template creation issue - Check if VM is in stopped state before creating template from its volume
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987994#comment-13987994 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6257: - Commit 59d0b75e7943505c11d6b726d7aa9dae0bf06316 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~gauravaradhye] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=59d0b75 ] CLOUDSTACK-6257: Adding function to check state of VM Private template creation issue - Check if VM is in stopped state before creating template from its volume -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6257 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6257 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Test Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Ashutosk Kelkar Assignee: Girish Shilamkar Labels: automation Fix For: 4.4.0 Following test cases are failing in case VM does not go into stopped state before creating template from its volume. test_01_template_usage test_05_templates_per_account test_05_templates_per_domain test_06_template_tag test_03_delete_template test_01_template_usage -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6257) Private template creation issue - Check if VM is in stopped state before creating template from its volume
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13987998#comment-13987998 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6257: - Commit 1be8b87fb7fb0203464ac4c66596008855ac5041 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~gauravaradhye] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=1be8b87 ] CLOUDSTACK-6257: Adding function to check state of VM Conflicts: tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py Private template creation issue - Check if VM is in stopped state before creating template from its volume -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6257 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6257 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Test Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Automation Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Reporter: Ashutosk Kelkar Assignee: Girish Shilamkar Labels: automation Fix For: 4.4.0 Following test cases are failing in case VM does not go into stopped state before creating template from its volume. test_01_template_usage test_05_templates_per_account test_05_templates_per_domain test_06_template_tag test_03_delete_template test_01_template_usage -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6438) [Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested plugin could not be found.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988053#comment-13988053
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6438:
-
Commit 2ff3623054eff9c1bbac7060bd568ba7406bef20 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~bfederle]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=2ff3623 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6438: WIP: Add filtering to check against existing IPs
[Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested
plugin could not be found.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Basic Zone
XenServer
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Anthony Xu
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.log.2014-04-16.gz
The requested plugin could not be found.
2014-04-16 15:55:43,850 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:97, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 205, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.template.CreateTemplateCmdByAdmin,
cmdInfo:
{cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,ispublic:False,isextractable:False,httpmethod:GET,volumeid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,domainid:fe2a30b2-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,isfeatured:False,apiKey:MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Q,ostypeid:feba4b70-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,id:205,response:json,name:Cent
OS Template-7WLKMH,passwordenabled:False,displaytext:Cent OS
Template,account:test-TestCreateTemplate-SCKX71,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:291,signature:8ILr8Hdfhc35eHAm1D0L7lkgRw4\u003d},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 112957957439171, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-04-16 15:55:43,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b) ===START=== 10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,877 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) Received unknown parameters for
command createTemplate. Unknown parameters : isextractable account
2014-04-16 15:55:43,921 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b ctx-62916341 ctx-11cd890f) ===END===
10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,947 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) template 205 is already in store:1,
type:Image
2014-04-16 15:55:43,972 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type TEMPLATE
2014-04-16 15:55:44,005 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (API-Job-Executor-41:job-97
ctx-554395e3) Seq 2-7234469851417280562: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
112957957439171, via: 2(marron.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a,id:1,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:nfs1-ccp.citrix.com,path:/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://nfs1-ccp.citrix.com/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a}},name:ROOT-17,size:21474836480,path:01269023-5389-407f-8dfc-a3ab22074207,volumeId:19,vmName:i-12-17-QA,accountId:12,format:VHD,id:19,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/12/205,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,id:205,format:RAW,accountId:12,hvm:true,displayText:Cent
OS
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6438) [Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested plugin could not be found.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988054#comment-13988054
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6438:
-
Commit 0ef9c9a1c0fcfd1d0afd1b8ba70b8fc2e54713cd in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~bfederle]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=0ef9c9a ]
CLOUDSTACK-6438: Filter out existing IPs in dropdown
[Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested
plugin could not be found.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Basic Zone
XenServer
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Anthony Xu
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.log.2014-04-16.gz
The requested plugin could not be found.
2014-04-16 15:55:43,850 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:97, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 205, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.template.CreateTemplateCmdByAdmin,
cmdInfo:
{cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,ispublic:False,isextractable:False,httpmethod:GET,volumeid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,domainid:fe2a30b2-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,isfeatured:False,apiKey:MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Q,ostypeid:feba4b70-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,id:205,response:json,name:Cent
OS Template-7WLKMH,passwordenabled:False,displaytext:Cent OS
Template,account:test-TestCreateTemplate-SCKX71,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:291,signature:8ILr8Hdfhc35eHAm1D0L7lkgRw4\u003d},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 112957957439171, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-04-16 15:55:43,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b) ===START=== 10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,877 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) Received unknown parameters for
command createTemplate. Unknown parameters : isextractable account
2014-04-16 15:55:43,921 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b ctx-62916341 ctx-11cd890f) ===END===
10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,947 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) template 205 is already in store:1,
type:Image
2014-04-16 15:55:43,972 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type TEMPLATE
2014-04-16 15:55:44,005 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (API-Job-Executor-41:job-97
ctx-554395e3) Seq 2-7234469851417280562: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
112957957439171, via: 2(marron.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a,id:1,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:nfs1-ccp.citrix.com,path:/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://nfs1-ccp.citrix.com/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a}},name:ROOT-17,size:21474836480,path:01269023-5389-407f-8dfc-a3ab22074207,volumeId:19,vmName:i-12-17-QA,accountId:12,format:VHD,id:19,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/12/205,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,id:205,format:RAW,accountId:12,hvm:true,displayText:Cent
OS
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6438) [Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested plugin could not be found.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988052#comment-13988052
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6438:
-
Commit 0e002ffa84a11c7a2ce2e684959cb203e4cc860e in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~bfederle]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=0e002ff ]
CLOUDSTACK-6438: WIP: If VM has additional IPs, keep showing in add screen
[Automation] Creation of Template from Volume failed due to the requested
plugin could not be found.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6438
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6438
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: Automation, Management Server
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Basic Zone
XenServer
Reporter: Chandan Purushothama
Assignee: Anthony Xu
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 4.4.0
Attachments: management-server.log.2014-04-16.gz
The requested plugin could not be found.
2014-04-16 15:55:43,850 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97) Executing AsyncJobVO {id:97, userId: 2,
accountId: 2, instanceType: Template, instanceId: 205, cmd:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.template.CreateTemplateCmdByAdmin,
cmdInfo:
{cmdEventType:TEMPLATE.CREATE,ctxUserId:2,ispublic:False,isextractable:False,httpmethod:GET,volumeid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,domainid:fe2a30b2-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,isfeatured:False,apiKey:MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Q,ostypeid:feba4b70-c5a8-11e3-8f55-66bc12ed7ec3,id:205,response:json,name:Cent
OS Template-7WLKMH,passwordenabled:False,displaytext:Cent OS
Template,account:test-TestCreateTemplate-SCKX71,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,ctxAccountId:2,ctxStartEventId:291,signature:8ILr8Hdfhc35eHAm1D0L7lkgRw4\u003d},
cmdVersion: 0, status: IN_PROGRESS, processStatus: 0, resultCode: 0, result:
null, initMsid: 112957957439171, completeMsid: null, lastUpdated: null,
lastPolled: null, created: null}
2014-04-16 15:55:43,853 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b) ===START=== 10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,877 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) Received unknown parameters for
command createTemplate. Unknown parameters : isextractable account
2014-04-16 15:55:43,921 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(catalina-exec-10:ctx-a6b8fe9b ctx-62916341 ctx-11cd890f) ===END===
10.223.240.161 -- GET
signature=vtGRmlHXmBNP%2F1rDkUstx%2BIMl4g%3DapiKey=MNQSBTYnkNvc4PCMgv7itBuPnuHpnUT_TEJRzzCOZXPL5bl9ihaz0P3TpkK3IW36icuUoFQkySLQkvQ9K6Dh0Qcommand=queryAsyncJobResultresponse=jsonjobid=51fab632-3d6f-4898-85e4-9597a8f39707
2014-04-16 15:55:43,947 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.i.TemplateDataFactoryImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) template 205 is already in store:1,
type:Image
2014-04-16 15:55:43,972 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(API-Job-Executor-41:job-97 ctx-554395e3) copyAsync inspecting src type
VOLUME copyAsync inspecting dest type TEMPLATE
2014-04-16 15:55:44,005 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (API-Job-Executor-41:job-97
ctx-554395e3) Seq 2-7234469851417280562: Sending { Cmd , MgmtId:
112957957439171, via: 2(marron.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011,
[{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand:{srcTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO:{uuid:58a0f1da-e5fe-4cf0-8981-8a8ce848662f,volumeType:ROOT,dataStore:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO:{uuid:ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a,id:1,poolType:NetworkFilesystem,host:nfs1-ccp.citrix.com,path:/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4,port:2049,url:NetworkFilesystem://nfs1-ccp.citrix.com/home/common/automation/SC_QA_AUTO7/primary4/?ROLE=PrimarySTOREUUID=ac0c4b04-6b72-38b1-a72f-c7fe7163d17a}},name:ROOT-17,size:21474836480,path:01269023-5389-407f-8dfc-a3ab22074207,volumeId:19,vmName:i-12-17-QA,accountId:12,format:VHD,id:19,deviceId:0,hypervisorType:XenServer}},destTO:{org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO:{path:template/tmpl/12/205,uuid:2575698c-c82c-4fc3-bd51-0993e40e81cb,id:205,format:RAW,accountId:12,hvm:true,displayText:Cent
OS
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6472) listUsageRecords generates NPEs for expunging instances
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988191#comment-13988191 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6472: - Commit 81b4731e3b5265943017f88b850421154184f7c5 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~SamSchmit] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=81b4731 ] CLOUDSTACK-6472 listUsageRecords: Pull information from removed items as well, fixing NPEs/Null UUIDs with usage API calls. Signed-off-by: Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com listUsageRecords generates NPEs for expunging instances --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6472 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6472 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server, Usage Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Environment: linux Reporter: Pierre-Yves Ritschard Attachments: 0001-handle-removed-entities.patch The listUsageRecords API command, pulls down the list of usage records in the cloud_usage database and augments records with information pulled from the cloud database. When dealing with instance records, only instances which are do not have a value for the removed field are considered. Unfortunately, since the output of _entityMgr.findById is not checked this means that Null Pointer Exceptions are generated when trying to access the output for expunged VMs. The attached patch fixes the issue and applies a similar fix for other similar cases. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6472) listUsageRecords generates NPEs for expunging instances
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988205#comment-13988205 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6472: - Commit fe84b674c14b6494770b489100e92a116b3b1f49 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~SamSchmit] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=fe84b67 ] CLOUDSTACK-6472 listUsageRecords: Pull information from removed items as well, fixing NPEs/Null UUIDs with usage API calls. listUsageRecords generates NPEs for expunging instances --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6472 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6472 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server, Usage Affects Versions: 4.3.0 Environment: linux Reporter: Pierre-Yves Ritschard Attachments: 0001-handle-removed-entities.patch The listUsageRecords API command, pulls down the list of usage records in the cloud_usage database and augments records with information pulled from the cloud database. When dealing with instance records, only instances which are do not have a value for the removed field are considered. Unfortunately, since the output of _entityMgr.findById is not checked this means that Null Pointer Exceptions are generated when trying to access the output for expunged VMs. The attached patch fixes the issue and applies a similar fix for other similar cases. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6569) IAM - Regular user is able to listNetworks of another user in the same domain , by passing account and domainId.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988312#comment-13988312
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6569:
-
Commit 03f6188c1c478222914904e3d7abac2740e98655 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=03f6188 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6569: IAM - Regular user is able to listNetworks of another
user in the same domain , by passing account and domainId.
IAM - Regular user is able to listNetworks of another user in the same domain
, by passing account and domainId.
-
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6569
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Build from 4.4
Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0
Regular user is able to listNetworks of another user in the same domain , by
passing account and domainId.
Domain - d1.
3 users in this domain , testd1 - domainadmin , testd1a and testd1b regular
users.
Each of the users have 1 isolated network.
As testd1a , tried to list network of testd1b by passing account and
domainId. ListNetwork returns testd1b's isolated network.
2014-05-02 10:21:29,090 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-15:ctx-bbcf35b4 ctx-f1b42d4e) (userId=4 accountId=4
sessionId=AE73B9C62BB908DE5DE16655DAD0CB75) 10.215.2.8 -- GET
command=listNetworksresponse=jsonsessionkey=vHQRHlttApujok8Jf73KKKww5XM%3DlistAll=truepage=1pagesize=20domainid=3abd56e8-97da-40f9-b6f5-33fd5b28b43eresponse=jsonaccount=testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49
200 { listnetworksresponse : { count:4 ,network : [
{id:53a9ddfa-ab63-4f87-bdd0-e368e7fd11ca,name:testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49-network,displaytext:testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49-network,broadcastdomaintype:Vlan,traffictype:Guest,gateway:10.1.1.1,netmask:255.255.255.0,cidr:10.1.1.0/24,zoneid:b690dddf-5755-49ab-8a4d-0aff04fa39f7,zonename:BLR1,networkofferingid:fc25eb7b-d884-4cc3-acbb-a321817a3567,networkofferingname:DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatService,networkofferingdisplaytext:Offering
for Isolated networks with Source Nat service
enabled,networkofferingconservemode:true,networkofferingavailability:Required,issystem:false,state:Implemented,related:53a9ddfa-ab63-4f87-bdd0-e368e7fd11ca,dns1:4.2.2.2,type:Isolated,acltype:Account,account:testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49,domainid:3abd56e8-97da-40f9-b6f5-33fd5b28b43e,domain:D1-R549ZO,service:[{name:PortForwarding},{name:UserData},{name:Firewall,capability:[{name:MultipleIps,value:true,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedEgressProtocols,value:tcp,udp,icmp,
all,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedProtocols,value:tcp,udp,icmp,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedTrafficDirection,value:ingress,
egress,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:TrafficStatistics,value:per
public
ip,canchooseservicecapability:false}]},{name:Lb,capability:[{name:AutoScaleCounters,value:[{\methodname\:\cpu\,\paramlist\:[]},{\methodname\:\memory\,\paramlist\:[]}],canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedLBIsolation,value:dedicated,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedLbAlgorithms,value:roundrobin,leastconn,source,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:LbSchemes,value:Public,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedProtocols,value:tcp,
udp,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedStickinessMethods,value:[{\methodname\:\LbCookie\,\paramlist\:[{\paramname\:\cookie-name\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\mode\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\nocache\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\indirect\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\postonly\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\domain\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\}],\description\:\This is loadbalancer cookie based stickiness
method.\},{\methodname\:\AppCookie\,\paramlist\:[{\paramname\:\cookie-name\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\length\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\holdtime\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\request-learn\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\prefix\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6569) IAM - Regular user is able to listNetworks of another user in the same domain , by passing account and domainId.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988371#comment-13988371
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6569:
-
Commit 1085695b5cd179e29fff98aa62a7d61415243064 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=1085695 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6569: IAM - Regular user is able to listNetworks of another
user in the same domain , by passing account and domainId.
IAM - Regular user is able to listNetworks of another user in the same domain
, by passing account and domainId.
-
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6569
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Build from 4.4
Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0
Regular user is able to listNetworks of another user in the same domain , by
passing account and domainId.
Domain - d1.
3 users in this domain , testd1 - domainadmin , testd1a and testd1b regular
users.
Each of the users have 1 isolated network.
As testd1a , tried to list network of testd1b by passing account and
domainId. ListNetwork returns testd1b's isolated network.
2014-05-02 10:21:29,090 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-15:ctx-bbcf35b4 ctx-f1b42d4e) (userId=4 accountId=4
sessionId=AE73B9C62BB908DE5DE16655DAD0CB75) 10.215.2.8 -- GET
command=listNetworksresponse=jsonsessionkey=vHQRHlttApujok8Jf73KKKww5XM%3DlistAll=truepage=1pagesize=20domainid=3abd56e8-97da-40f9-b6f5-33fd5b28b43eresponse=jsonaccount=testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49
200 { listnetworksresponse : { count:4 ,network : [
{id:53a9ddfa-ab63-4f87-bdd0-e368e7fd11ca,name:testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49-network,displaytext:testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49-network,broadcastdomaintype:Vlan,traffictype:Guest,gateway:10.1.1.1,netmask:255.255.255.0,cidr:10.1.1.0/24,zoneid:b690dddf-5755-49ab-8a4d-0aff04fa39f7,zonename:BLR1,networkofferingid:fc25eb7b-d884-4cc3-acbb-a321817a3567,networkofferingname:DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatService,networkofferingdisplaytext:Offering
for Isolated networks with Source Nat service
enabled,networkofferingconservemode:true,networkofferingavailability:Required,issystem:false,state:Implemented,related:53a9ddfa-ab63-4f87-bdd0-e368e7fd11ca,dns1:4.2.2.2,type:Isolated,acltype:Account,account:testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49,domainid:3abd56e8-97da-40f9-b6f5-33fd5b28b43e,domain:D1-R549ZO,service:[{name:PortForwarding},{name:UserData},{name:Firewall,capability:[{name:MultipleIps,value:true,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedEgressProtocols,value:tcp,udp,icmp,
all,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedProtocols,value:tcp,udp,icmp,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedTrafficDirection,value:ingress,
egress,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:TrafficStatistics,value:per
public
ip,canchooseservicecapability:false}]},{name:Lb,capability:[{name:AutoScaleCounters,value:[{\methodname\:\cpu\,\paramlist\:[]},{\methodname\:\memory\,\paramlist\:[]}],canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedLBIsolation,value:dedicated,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedLbAlgorithms,value:roundrobin,leastconn,source,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:LbSchemes,value:Public,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedProtocols,value:tcp,
udp,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedStickinessMethods,value:[{\methodname\:\LbCookie\,\paramlist\:[{\paramname\:\cookie-name\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\mode\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\nocache\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\indirect\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\postonly\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\domain\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\}],\description\:\This is loadbalancer cookie based stickiness
method.\},{\methodname\:\AppCookie\,\paramlist\:[{\paramname\:\cookie-name\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\length\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\holdtime\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\request-learn\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\prefix\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6569) IAM - Regular user is able to listNetworks of another user in the same domain , by passing account and domainId.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988393#comment-13988393
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6569:
-
Commit 7f595778ada00bbe607516bd9630976a4113098e in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7f59577 ]
Fix compilation error due to cherry-pick CLOUDSTACK-6569.
IAM - Regular user is able to listNetworks of another user in the same domain
, by passing account and domainId.
-
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6569
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: IAM
Affects Versions: 4.4.0
Environment: Build from 4.4
Reporter: Sangeetha Hariharan
Assignee: Min Chen
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 4.4.0
Regular user is able to listNetworks of another user in the same domain , by
passing account and domainId.
Domain - d1.
3 users in this domain , testd1 - domainadmin , testd1a and testd1b regular
users.
Each of the users have 1 isolated network.
As testd1a , tried to list network of testd1b by passing account and
domainId. ListNetwork returns testd1b's isolated network.
2014-05-02 10:21:29,090 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-15:ctx-bbcf35b4 ctx-f1b42d4e) (userId=4 accountId=4
sessionId=AE73B9C62BB908DE5DE16655DAD0CB75) 10.215.2.8 -- GET
command=listNetworksresponse=jsonsessionkey=vHQRHlttApujok8Jf73KKKww5XM%3DlistAll=truepage=1pagesize=20domainid=3abd56e8-97da-40f9-b6f5-33fd5b28b43eresponse=jsonaccount=testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49
200 { listnetworksresponse : { count:4 ,network : [
{id:53a9ddfa-ab63-4f87-bdd0-e368e7fd11ca,name:testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49-network,displaytext:testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49-network,broadcastdomaintype:Vlan,traffictype:Guest,gateway:10.1.1.1,netmask:255.255.255.0,cidr:10.1.1.0/24,zoneid:b690dddf-5755-49ab-8a4d-0aff04fa39f7,zonename:BLR1,networkofferingid:fc25eb7b-d884-4cc3-acbb-a321817a3567,networkofferingname:DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingWithSourceNatService,networkofferingdisplaytext:Offering
for Isolated networks with Source Nat service
enabled,networkofferingconservemode:true,networkofferingavailability:Required,issystem:false,state:Implemented,related:53a9ddfa-ab63-4f87-bdd0-e368e7fd11ca,dns1:4.2.2.2,type:Isolated,acltype:Account,account:testD1B-TestNetworkList-KOGK49,domainid:3abd56e8-97da-40f9-b6f5-33fd5b28b43e,domain:D1-R549ZO,service:[{name:PortForwarding},{name:UserData},{name:Firewall,capability:[{name:MultipleIps,value:true,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedEgressProtocols,value:tcp,udp,icmp,
all,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedProtocols,value:tcp,udp,icmp,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedTrafficDirection,value:ingress,
egress,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:TrafficStatistics,value:per
public
ip,canchooseservicecapability:false}]},{name:Lb,capability:[{name:AutoScaleCounters,value:[{\methodname\:\cpu\,\paramlist\:[]},{\methodname\:\memory\,\paramlist\:[]}],canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedLBIsolation,value:dedicated,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedLbAlgorithms,value:roundrobin,leastconn,source,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:LbSchemes,value:Public,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedProtocols,value:tcp,
udp,canchooseservicecapability:false},{name:SupportedStickinessMethods,value:[{\methodname\:\LbCookie\,\paramlist\:[{\paramname\:\cookie-name\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\mode\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\nocache\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\indirect\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\postonly\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\domain\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\}],\description\:\This is loadbalancer cookie based stickiness
method.\},{\methodname\:\AppCookie\,\paramlist\:[{\paramname\:\cookie-name\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\length\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\holdtime\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\request-learn\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\prefix\,\required\:false,\isflag\:true,\description\:\
\},{\paramname\:\mode\,\required\:false,\isflag\:false,\description\:\
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6568) API:createVolume: Volume gets created with wrong domain ID
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988433#comment-13988433
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6568:
-
Commit ffec3d02844fe644d40f35c55a83719b8d6102b6 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=ffec3d0 ]
CLOUDSTACK-6568:API:createVolume: Volume gets created with wrong domain
ID.
API:createVolume: Volume gets created with wrong domain ID
--
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6568
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6568
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: API, Volumes
Affects Versions: 4.3.0, 4.4.0, 4.3.1
Reporter: Parth Jagirdar
Assignee: Min Chen
Attachments: createVolume.jpg
http://10.223.49.210:8080/client/api?command=createVolumename=d22-volumezoneid=05f156b6-cf10-4891-b7d7-6421f4d87e91diskofferingid=099a28b3-12d2-461e-9558-1c08e8eb5a2ddomainid=82d02e0c-4f25-42a6-9e5b-dc3fae90eb34account=d22response=jsonsessionkey=7ChzlM0hZkWuWUIPlS%2BkV%2BwHghU%3D
2014-05-02 13:37:41,544 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-669b420f ctx-a9da8d5c) (userId=2 a
ccountId=2 sessionId=B19BA8EED26B975AA6AAEB9E8F25EFC5) 10.215.2.19 -- GET
command=createVolumename=d22-vo
lumezoneid=05f156b6-cf10-4891-b7d7-6421f4d87e91diskofferingid=099a28b3-12d2-461e-9558-1c08e8eb5a2ddomai
nid=82d02e0c-4f25-42a6-9e5b-dc3fae90eb34account=d22response=jsonsessionkey=7ChzlM0hZkWuWUIPlS%2BkV%2BwH
ghU%3D 200 { createvolumeresponse :
{id:224bc4e6-9ecc-4ccf-bd58-09f47ca5b7a2,jobid:d537170d-ab2b-
4880-ae35-f9846e5ef88d} }
{ createvolumeresponse :
{id:224bc4e6-9ecc-4ccf-bd58-09f47ca5b7a2,jobid:d537170d-ab2b-4880-ae35-f9846e5ef88d}
}
createVolume is invoked as ROOT Admin with account and Domain, (To
create Vol for other User).
Volume gets created with specified account. But domain ID is of ROOT.
| 2 | 1 | test|
| 2 | 1 | root-volume |
| 7 | 1 | root-volume |
| 7 | 1 | d22-volume |
++---+-+
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6170) Support managed storage for root disks
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988483#comment-13988483 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6170: - Commit 0cdcab26f5636ed4de2d1c26a6606f85f935f6da in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~mike-tutkowski] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=0cdcab2 ] CLOUDSTACK-6170 Corrected an issue related to the Reinstall VM command and managed storage with VMware Support managed storage for root disks -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: I expect to support managed storage for root disks on XenServer and ESX (KVM is targeted for 4.5). Reporter: Mike Tutkowski Assignee: Mike Tutkowski Fix For: 4.4.0 Cloud environments have a need for guaranteed storage performance. By this I mean having the ability to specify a minimum and maximum number of IOPS on a volume-by-volume basis. I added support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.2 for data disks. I added support for this for KVM in 4.3 for data disks. It is my intent to add support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.4 for root disks (with subsequent support for root disks on KVM expected in 4.5). The main changes are expected to occur in CloudStack logic that controls hypervisors and additions to the way root-volume orchestration happens. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6170) Support managed storage for root disks
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988492#comment-13988492 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6170: - Commit 8ac7784db2cc8cf8247eab355181eb44a849de38 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~mike-tutkowski] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=8ac7784 ] CLOUDSTACK-6170 Corrected an issue related to the Reinstall VM command and managed storage with VMware Support managed storage for root disks -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: I expect to support managed storage for root disks on XenServer and ESX (KVM is targeted for 4.5). Reporter: Mike Tutkowski Assignee: Mike Tutkowski Fix For: 4.4.0 Cloud environments have a need for guaranteed storage performance. By this I mean having the ability to specify a minimum and maximum number of IOPS on a volume-by-volume basis. I added support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.2 for data disks. I added support for this for KVM in 4.3 for data disks. It is my intent to add support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.4 for root disks (with subsequent support for root disks on KVM expected in 4.5). The main changes are expected to occur in CloudStack logic that controls hypervisors and additions to the way root-volume orchestration happens. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6568) API:createVolume: Volume gets created with wrong domain ID
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988514#comment-13988514
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6568:
-
Commit 4e674ffad1abac139bbb4782b428b7179bfdd0d6 in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/master from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4e674ff ]
CLOUDSTACK-6568:API:createVolume: Volume gets created with wrong domain
ID.
API:createVolume: Volume gets created with wrong domain ID
--
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6568
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6568
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: API, Volumes
Affects Versions: 4.3.0, 4.4.0, 4.3.1
Reporter: Parth Jagirdar
Assignee: Min Chen
Attachments: createVolume.jpg
http://10.223.49.210:8080/client/api?command=createVolumename=d22-volumezoneid=05f156b6-cf10-4891-b7d7-6421f4d87e91diskofferingid=099a28b3-12d2-461e-9558-1c08e8eb5a2ddomainid=82d02e0c-4f25-42a6-9e5b-dc3fae90eb34account=d22response=jsonsessionkey=7ChzlM0hZkWuWUIPlS%2BkV%2BwHghU%3D
2014-05-02 13:37:41,544 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-669b420f ctx-a9da8d5c) (userId=2 a
ccountId=2 sessionId=B19BA8EED26B975AA6AAEB9E8F25EFC5) 10.215.2.19 -- GET
command=createVolumename=d22-vo
lumezoneid=05f156b6-cf10-4891-b7d7-6421f4d87e91diskofferingid=099a28b3-12d2-461e-9558-1c08e8eb5a2ddomai
nid=82d02e0c-4f25-42a6-9e5b-dc3fae90eb34account=d22response=jsonsessionkey=7ChzlM0hZkWuWUIPlS%2BkV%2BwH
ghU%3D 200 { createvolumeresponse :
{id:224bc4e6-9ecc-4ccf-bd58-09f47ca5b7a2,jobid:d537170d-ab2b-
4880-ae35-f9846e5ef88d} }
{ createvolumeresponse :
{id:224bc4e6-9ecc-4ccf-bd58-09f47ca5b7a2,jobid:d537170d-ab2b-4880-ae35-f9846e5ef88d}
}
createVolume is invoked as ROOT Admin with account and Domain, (To
create Vol for other User).
Volume gets created with specified account. But domain ID is of ROOT.
| 2 | 1 | test|
| 2 | 1 | root-volume |
| 7 | 1 | root-volume |
| 7 | 1 | d22-volume |
++---+-+
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6568) API:createVolume: Volume gets created with wrong domain ID
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988658#comment-13988658
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6568:
-
Commit 71e0cff46ecbbce204032e6467a66cf740859f6e in cloudstack's branch
refs/heads/4.4 from [~minchen07]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=71e0cff ]
CLOUDSTACK-6568:API:createVolume: Volume gets created with wrong domain
ID.
API:createVolume: Volume gets created with wrong domain ID
--
Key: CLOUDSTACK-6568
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6568
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
default.)
Components: API, Volumes
Affects Versions: 4.3.0, 4.4.0, 4.3.1
Reporter: Parth Jagirdar
Assignee: Min Chen
Attachments: createVolume.jpg
http://10.223.49.210:8080/client/api?command=createVolumename=d22-volumezoneid=05f156b6-cf10-4891-b7d7-6421f4d87e91diskofferingid=099a28b3-12d2-461e-9558-1c08e8eb5a2ddomainid=82d02e0c-4f25-42a6-9e5b-dc3fae90eb34account=d22response=jsonsessionkey=7ChzlM0hZkWuWUIPlS%2BkV%2BwHghU%3D
2014-05-02 13:37:41,544 INFO [a.c.c.a.ApiServer]
(catalina-exec-22:ctx-669b420f ctx-a9da8d5c) (userId=2 a
ccountId=2 sessionId=B19BA8EED26B975AA6AAEB9E8F25EFC5) 10.215.2.19 -- GET
command=createVolumename=d22-vo
lumezoneid=05f156b6-cf10-4891-b7d7-6421f4d87e91diskofferingid=099a28b3-12d2-461e-9558-1c08e8eb5a2ddomai
nid=82d02e0c-4f25-42a6-9e5b-dc3fae90eb34account=d22response=jsonsessionkey=7ChzlM0hZkWuWUIPlS%2BkV%2BwH
ghU%3D 200 { createvolumeresponse :
{id:224bc4e6-9ecc-4ccf-bd58-09f47ca5b7a2,jobid:d537170d-ab2b-
4880-ae35-f9846e5ef88d} }
{ createvolumeresponse :
{id:224bc4e6-9ecc-4ccf-bd58-09f47ca5b7a2,jobid:d537170d-ab2b-4880-ae35-f9846e5ef88d}
}
createVolume is invoked as ROOT Admin with account and Domain, (To
create Vol for other User).
Volume gets created with specified account. But domain ID is of ROOT.
| 2 | 1 | test|
| 2 | 1 | root-volume |
| 7 | 1 | root-volume |
| 7 | 1 | d22-volume |
++---+-+
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6170) Support managed storage for root disks
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13988659#comment-13988659 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6170: - Commit dd3076987f5120bf5bee1457a1b980125139191d in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4 from [~mike-tutkowski] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=dd30769 ] CLOUDSTACK-6170 Corrected an issue related to the Reinstall VM command and managed storage with VMware Support managed storage for root disks -- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: I expect to support managed storage for root disks on XenServer and ESX (KVM is targeted for 4.5). Reporter: Mike Tutkowski Assignee: Mike Tutkowski Fix For: 4.4.0 Cloud environments have a need for guaranteed storage performance. By this I mean having the ability to specify a minimum and maximum number of IOPS on a volume-by-volume basis. I added support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.2 for data disks. I added support for this for KVM in 4.3 for data disks. It is my intent to add support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.4 for root disks (with subsequent support for root disks on KVM expected in 4.5). The main changes are expected to occur in CloudStack logic that controls hypervisors and additions to the way root-volume orchestration happens. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6571) 'service cloudstack-agent stop' fails to stop the process started on boot
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13989248#comment-13989248 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6571: - Commit 4443890c852d58ff6baf08134b677eaf64b5c763 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/master from [~ynojima] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=4443890 ] CLOUDSTACK-6571 bugfix: 'service cloudstack-agent stop' fails to stop the process started on boot 'service cloudstack-agent stop' fails to stop the process started on boot - Key: CLOUDSTACK-6571 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6571 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Reporter: Yoshikazu Nojima Assignee: Yoshikazu Nojima Priority: Critical Labels: kvm, packaging The pid of the cloudstack-agent process started on boot is recored in /var/run/Sxx-cloudstack-agent.pid by mistake. It should be recoreded in /var/run/cloudstack-agent.pid. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6571) 'service cloudstack-agent stop' fails to stop the process started on boot
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13989250#comment-13989250 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6571: - Commit 03156ecd6f52bfa0c73f1408ac4baca5332d1cad in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~ynojima] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=03156ec ] CLOUDSTACK-6571 bugfix: 'service cloudstack-agent stop' fails to stop the process started on boot 'service cloudstack-agent stop' fails to stop the process started on boot - Key: CLOUDSTACK-6571 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6571 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Reporter: Yoshikazu Nojima Assignee: Yoshikazu Nojima Priority: Critical Labels: kvm, packaging Fix For: Future, 4.4.0 The pid of the cloudstack-agent process started on boot is recored in /var/run/Sxx-cloudstack-agent.pid by mistake. It should be recoreded in /var/run/cloudstack-agent.pid. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6240) ipset requires VM stop/start to get updated
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13989289#comment-13989289 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6240: - Commit 2215fbf4c9e62f97a84eb7db3db5ee708903cd65 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.3 from Jayapal [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=2215fbf ] CLOUDSTACK-6240 Fixed updating advanced SG rules for vm nic secondary ip ipset requires VM stop/start to get updated --- Key: CLOUDSTACK-6240 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6240 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: KVM, Network Controller, XenServer Affects Versions: 4.2.1, 4.3.0, 4.4.0 Environment: CentOS 6.5 64bit Reporter: Nux Assignee: Jayapal Reddy Labels: ipset, security_groups Attachments: 0001-CLOUDSTACK-6240-Fixed-updating-advanced-SG-rules-for-master.patch, 0001-CLOUDSTACK-6240-Fixed-updating-advanced-SG-rules-for.patch In an advanced zone with security groups, when a new IP address is acquired for a VM, this IP is not added in the running ipset corresponding to the VM. `ipset -L` continues to only show the main IP until the VM is restarted. Adding the extra IP is as easy as: ipset add i-2-3-VM 10.187.72.214 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6559) [Automation] SG test cases failing during vm deployment
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13989294#comment-13989294 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6559: - Commit 9f314c69a0430ec1a53e6b64098794924ec648b8 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~gpshilamkar] [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=9f314c6 ] CLOUDSTACK-6559: Added listall=True to list vm API [Automation] SG test cases failing during vm deployment Key: CLOUDSTACK-6559 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6559 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Test Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) Components: Management Server Affects Versions: 4.4.0 Environment: KVM basic SG Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan Priority: Blocker Fix For: 4.4.0 Run test_tags.py in basic security group environment Test cases failing with below error Unable to create security group, a group with name basic_sec_grp already exisits. Test cases failing while creating 2 VMs, second VM creating failing 215 cls.vm_1 = VirtualMachine.create( 216 cls.api_client, 217 cls.services[virtual_machine], 218 accountid=cls.account.name, 219 domainid=cls.account.domainid, 220 serviceofferingid=cls.service_offering.id, 221 mode=cls.zone.networktype 222 ) 223 cls.vm_2 = VirtualMachine.create( 224 cls.api_client, 225 cls.services[virtual_machine], 226 accountid=cls.account.name, 227 domainid=cls.account.domainid, 228 serviceofferingid=cls.service_offering.id, 229 mode=cls.zone.networktype Actual issue in below code base.py. in list security, we are not passing listall=true, this required in latest 4.4 builds 240 @classmethod 241 def ssh_access_group(cls, apiclient, cmd): 242 243 Programs the security group with SSH access before deploying virtualmachine 244 @return: 245 246 zone_list = Zone.list( 247 apiclient, 248 id=cmd.zoneid if cmd.zoneid else None, 249 domainid=cmd.domainid if cmd.domainid else None 250 ) 251 zone = zone_list[0] 252 #check if security groups settings is enabled for the zone 253 if zone.securitygroupsenabled: 254 list_security_groups = SecurityGroup.list( 255 apiclient, 256 account=cmd.account, 257 domainid=cmd.domainid, 258 securitygroupname=basic_sec_grp 259 ) 260 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)
