[jira] Closed: (EMAIL-83) Problems using SMTP authentication with JavaMail 1.4.1

2010-03-27 Thread Siegfried Goeschl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siegfried Goeschl closed EMAIL-83. -- Resolution: Cannot Reproduce We are not able to reproduce the problem and got no furhter

[jira] Closed: (EMAIL-86) Please expose means so that Transport.send(Message msg, Address[] addresses) may be sometimes called in place of Transport.send(Message msg)

2010-03-27 Thread Siegfried Goeschl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siegfried Goeschl closed EMAIL-86. -- Resolution: Not A Problem Please expose means so that Transport.send(Message msg, Address[]

[jira] Closed: (EXEC-43) DefaultExecutor.setExitValues(null) throws NullPointerException

2010-03-27 Thread Siegfried Goeschl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXEC-43?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siegfried Goeschl closed EXEC-43. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.0.1 This was already fixed a while ago ...

[jira] Commented: (DAEMON-156) Prunsrv crashes with access violation when stopping service

2010-03-27 Thread Sebb (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850519#action_12850519 ] Sebb commented on DAEMON-156: - The problem does not occur for me with mode=Java (using the

[jira] Commented: (EMAIL-93) A dot (.) is appended to some ULRs in the body of an Html type email.

2010-03-27 Thread Siegfried Goeschl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-93?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850522#action_12850522 ] Siegfried Goeschl commented on EMAIL-93: Hi Brian, I had a look at the issue by

[jira] Commented: (EMAIL-95) content duplicated with UTF8 encoding

2010-03-27 Thread Siegfried Goeschl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850523#action_12850523 ] Siegfried Goeschl commented on EMAIL-95: Yes, a good idea - I have a look content

[jira] Commented: (DAEMON-100) Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader() == null when the program is runned by Prunsrv

2010-03-27 Thread Dominik Drzewiecki (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850575#action_12850575 ] Dominik Drzewiecki commented on DAEMON-100: --- I confirm. This one is particularly

[jira] Commented: (LANG-576) Add methods for cloneables to ObjectUtils

2010-03-27 Thread Henri Yandell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850580#action_12850580 ] Henri Yandell commented on LANG-576: Thanks. I think it's fair to keep the method, but

[jira] Created: (LANG-613) ConstructorUtils.getAccessibleConstructor() Does Not Check the Accessibility of Enclosing Classes

2010-03-27 Thread David M. Sledge (JIRA)
ConstructorUtils.getAccessibleConstructor() Does Not Check the Accessibility of Enclosing Classes - Key: LANG-613 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-613

[jira] Commented: (CODEC-99) Base64.encodeBase64String() shouldn't chunk

2010-03-27 Thread Gary Gregory (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850602#action_12850602 ] Gary Gregory commented on CODEC-99: --- Applied patch

[jira] Commented: (CODEC-99) Base64.encodeBase64String() shouldn't chunk

2010-03-27 Thread Gary Gregory (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850626#action_12850626 ] Gary Gregory commented on CODEC-99: --- IMO, the issue is not chunk vs. not chunk but that the