[jira] [Commented] (MATH-1426) Add constructor with Double[] argument to DescriptiveStatistics

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16113715#comment-16113715 ] Gilles commented on MATH-1426: -- A unit test would be welcome. > Add constructor with Double[]

[jira] [Updated] (NUMBERS-48) Unreachable statements in Complex.abs()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-48?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gilles updated NUMBERS-48: -- Affects Version/s: (was: 1.1) Fix Version/s: 1.0 > Unreachable statements in Complex.abs() > ---

[jira] [Reopened] (NET-641) SubnetUtils.SubnetInfo.isInRange("0.0.0.0") returns true for CIDR/31, 32

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] pin_ptr reopened NET-641: - My idea: public boolean isInRange(int address) { long addLong = address & UNSIGNED_INT_MASK; if (inclusiveHostC

[jira] [Commented] (NET-641) SubnetUtils.SubnetInfo.isInRange("0.0.0.0") returns true for CIDR/31, 32

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16113147#comment-16113147 ] pin_ptr commented on NET-641: - It seems to return false to follwing code, it should be true. Sub

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-1427) Unreachable statements in Complex.abs()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16113118#comment-16113118 ] David Nickerson commented on MATH-1427: --- Bug report migrated to [https://issues.apach

[jira] [Created] (NUMBERS-48) Unreachable statements in Complex.abs()

David Nickerson created NUMBERS-48: -- Summary: Unreachable statements in Complex.abs() Key: NUMBERS-48 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-48 Project: Commons Numbers Issue Typ

[jira] [Updated] (DBCP-478) Wrong parameter name in site documentation for BasicDataSource Configuration Parameters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory updated DBCP-478: -- Summary: Wrong parameter name in site documentation for BasicDataSource Configuration Parameters (was: Wr

[jira] [Updated] (DBCP-478) Wrong parameter name in site documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory updated DBCP-478: -- Summary: Wrong parameter name in site documentation (was: Wrong parameter name) > Wrong parameter name i

[jira] [Resolved] (NET-641) SubnetUtils.SubnetInfo.isInRange("0.0.0.0") returns true for CIDR/31, 32

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb resolved NET-641. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.7 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1804012&view=rev Log: NET-641 SubnetUtils

[jira] [Updated] (NET-641) SubnetUtils.SubnetInfo.isInRange("0.0.0.0") returns true for CIDR/31, 32

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb updated NET-641: - Summary: SubnetUtils.SubnetInfo.isInRange("0.0.0.0") returns true for CIDR/31, 32 (was: SubnetUtils.SubnetInfo.isInRange("0.

[jira] [Commented] (NET-641) SubnetUtils.SubnetInfo.isInRange("0.0.0.0") returns incorrect value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16112902#comment-16112902 ] Sebb commented on NET-641: -- I agree; 0.0.0.0 cannot be in range for any address spec. > SubnetUtils

[jira] [Created] (DBCP-478) Wrong parameter name

nicola mele created DBCP-478: Summary: Wrong parameter name Key: DBCP-478 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-478 Project: Commons Dbcp Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 2

[jira] [Commented] (NUMBERS-2) Potential performance issues in "ComplexUtils"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16112594#comment-16112594 ] Gilles commented on NUMBERS-2: -- bq. it is hard to see a motivation to recode them as loops Wh

[jira] [Commented] (NUMBERS-30) Move "array" utilities from "Commons Math"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16112592#comment-16112592 ] Gilles commented on NUMBERS-30: --- Sure. Since the target is "1.1", this is certainly low prio

[jira] [Commented] (NUMBERS-2) Potential performance issues in "ComplexUtils"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-2?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16112588#comment-16112588 ] Eric Barnhill commented on NUMBERS-2: - The rename is a good idea. Also, the whole class

[jira] [Commented] (NUMBERS-30) Move "array" utilities from "Commons Math"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16112570#comment-16112570 ] Eric Barnhill commented on NUMBERS-30: -- A lot of the array utilities are now better s

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-1427) Unreachable statements in Complex.abs()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16112569#comment-16112569 ] Gilles commented on MATH-1427: -- The "complex number" functionality is being refactored within