[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-09 Thread kinow
Github user kinow commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 Thank you for updating the pull request. Tested locally. Using the changes in the pull request I get the same result as we get when the settings are in the Maven settings.

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-09 Thread osiegmar
Github user osiegmar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 > Could you update the pull request with your original change duplicated in that portion, please? Done. Thanks for pointing that out! ---

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-09 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/13196430/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/13196430) Coverage remained the same at 95.201% when pulling

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-09 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/13196392/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/13196392) Coverage decreased (-0.001%) to 95.2% when pulling

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-08 Thread kinow
Github user kinow commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 >Does it really generates a site for the current branch? It should. That is one step in the release process. Probably due to the site using another configuration (under the reporting

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-08 Thread osiegmar
Github user osiegmar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 I haven't checked the configuration of the maven site plugin in detail. Does it really generates a site for the current branch? I doubt that, as I've seen subversion commands in the config...

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-08 Thread kinow
Github user kinow commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 Not sure. Here's what I just tried. ``` $ git reset --hard $ git status On branch pr/285 $ vim checkstyle.xml $ # removed line $ mvn clean site

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-08 Thread osiegmar
Github user osiegmar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 Removing the SuppressionFilter results in thousands of errors. Maybe you have a stale checkstyle cache file `target/cachefile`? ---

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-08 Thread kinow
Github user kinow commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 Checked out pull request branch, built with the change, got no checkstyle errors. Then removed the suppression (without re-adding the previous value in pom.xml) and also got the same result,

[GitHub] commons-lang issue #285: make checkstyle config more portable (no maven coup...

2017-09-08 Thread coveralls
Github user coveralls commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/285 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/13181719/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/13181719) Coverage remained the same at 95.194% when pulling